Đàm phán Ranh giới Quyền Lực trong Quản trị Toàn cầu về Chăm sóc

Development - Tập 64 - Trang 39-47 - 2021
Marina Durano1
1Open Society Foundations, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

Trọng tâm của việc xây dựng các nền kinh tế chăm sóc như một bước cần thiết hướng tới công bằng giới tính đòi hỏi một cuộc đánh giá lại về quản trị kinh tế toàn cầu và chủ nghĩa đa phương tập trung vào nhà nước. Các cấu trúc quyền lực toàn cầu không thể được xem chỉ đơn thuần là vấn đề về biên giới chính trị của các quốc gia, điều này thuộc về phạm vi truyền thống của chính sách đối ngoại. Thay vì địa lý, điều cần được xem xét là các cuộc đàm phán về ranh giới quyền lực, từ đó mở ra khả năng vẽ lại biên giới và ranh giới như được biểu hiện trong các mối quan hệ xã hội trong đó các chức năng chăm sóc được thực hiện. Năm lĩnh vực tham gia được xác định và thảo luận. Một ghi chú ngắn về chủ nghĩa giới hạn đặt ra câu hỏi về giá trị của nó trong một nền kinh tế chăm sóc và cách mà đạo đức chăm sóc liên kết với điều đó.

Từ khóa

#kinh tế chăm sóc #công bằng giới tính #quản trị toàn cầu #quyền lực #đạo đức chăm sóc

Tài liệu tham khảo

Avram, Gabriela, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Stefano de Paoli, Ann Light, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2019. Repositioning CoDesign in the age of platform capitalism: from sharing to caring. International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 15 (3): 185–191. Balakrishnan, Radhika, James Heintz, and Diane Elson. 2016. Rethinking Economic Policy for Social Justice. London and New York: Routledge. Bidegain Ponte, Nicole, Marina Durano, and Corina Rodriguez Enriquez. 2015. Shifting Responsibilities without Changing the Balance of Power: What Chance of Equality with the Addis Ababa Action Agenda? http://www.unrisd.org/road-to-addis-bidegain-et-al. Breen, Keith. 2015. Law beyond command? An evaluation of Arendt’s Understanding of Law. In Hannah Arendt and the Law, Marco Goldoni and Christopher McCorkindale (eds.). New York: Hart Publishing. Chang, Ha-Joon. 2001. Breaking the Mould: An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neoliberal Theory of the Market and the State, UNRISD Social Policy and Development Programme Paper No. 6. Geneva, May. Curato, Nicole, John S. Dryzek, Selen A. Ercan, Carolyn M. Hendriks, and Simon Niemeyer. 2017. Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research, Daedalus (Summer): 28–38. https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/daedalus/downloads/17_Summer_Daedalus.pdf. David, Sarah, Catalina Gil Pinzon, Elisa Lorenz, and Antonia Schmidt. 2019. Raising voices: Empowering female farmers in drug crop cultivation areas. Bonn: BMZ and OSF. Djelic, Marie-Laure, and Sigrid Quack. 2003. Governing Globalization-Bringing Institutions Back In. In Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game, Marie-Laure. Djelic and Sigrid Quack (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Durano, Marina, and Nicole Bidegain-Ponte. 2016. A Feminist Perspective on the Follow-Up Process for Financing for Development. Development 59(1–2): 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0075-z. Fischer, Bernice, and Joan C. Tronto. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Care. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson (eds.). New York: State University of New York Press, SUNY Series on Women and Work. Folbre, Nancy, and Erik Olin Wright. 2012. Defining Care. In For Love and Money: Care Provision in the United States, Nancy Folbre (ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. New York: Verso Books. Gearhart-Serna, Terra L. 2010. Women’s Work, Women’s Knowing: Intellectual Property and the Recognition of Women’s Traditional Knowledge, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 21(372): 373–404, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1304&context=yjlf. Gurumurthy, Anita. 2016. Internet governance as seen from the Right to Development, OpenDemocracy 16 June, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/internet-governance-as-seen-from-right-to-development/. Heintz, James. 2019. The Economy’s Other Half: How Taking Gender Seriously Transforms Macroeconomics. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Agenda Publishing. Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Kramm, Matthias, and Ingrid Robeyns. 2020. Limits to wealth in the history of Western philosophy. European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12535. Le, Quéré, Robert B. Corinne, Matthew W. Jackson, Adam J.P. Jones, Sam Abernethy Smith, Robbie M. Andrew, Anthony J. De-Gol, David R. Willis, Yuli Shan, Josep G. Canadell, Pierre Friedlingstein, Felix Creutzig, and Glen P. Peters. 2020. Temporary reduction in global CO2 emissions during the COVID19 forced confinement. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x. Minaker, Joanne, and Bryan Hogeveen (eds.). 2015. Criminalized Mothers, Criminalized Mothering. Bradford, Ontario: Demeter Press. Nussbaum, Martha. 2013. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press. Nussbaum, Martha. 2003a. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59. Nussbaum, Martha. 2003b. Compassion and terror, Daedalus (Winter 2003): 10–26, https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/daedalus/downloads/03_winter_daedalus_articles.pdf. Razavi, Shahra. 2007. The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context: Contextual Issues, Research Questions, and Policy Options, Gender and Development Programme Paper 3. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (June). Robeyns, Ingrid. 2017. Having too much. In Wealth—Yearbook of the American society for political and legal philosophy, J. Knight and M. Schwartzberg (ed.), 1–44. New York: New York University Press. Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Rocheleau, Dianne, Barbara Thomas-Slatter, and Esther Wangari. 1996. Gender and environment: a feminist political ecology perspective. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. Rockström, Johan, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, F. Åsa Persson, I.I.I. Stuart Chapin, Eric F. Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Björn. Nykvist, Cynthia A. de Wit, Terry Hughes, Sander van der Leeuw, Henning Rodhe, Sverker Sörlin, Peter K. Snyder, Robert Costanza, Uno Svedin, Malin Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Robert W. Corell, Victoria J. Fabry, James Hansen, Brian Walker, Diana Liverman, Katherine Richardson, Paul Crutzen, and Jonathan A. Foley. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (September): 472–475. Roy, Arundhati. 2020. The pandemic is a portal, Financial Times, 2 April (online edition). Seguino, Stephanie. 2019. Engendering Macroeconomic Theory and Policy. Feminist Economics 26 (2): 27–61. Sen, Amartya. 1990. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. In Persistent Inequalities, Irene Tinker (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Sen, Gita, and Marina Durano (eds.). 2014. The Remaking of Social Contracts: Feminists in a Fierce New World. London: Zed Books. Tandon, Ambika and Aayush. 2020. Digital mediation of reproductive and care work in India: research reflexivity and challenges, https://genderit.org/articles/digital-mediation-of-reproductive-and-care-work. Accessed 30 June 2020. Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge. United Nations. 2010. Guidance Note of the Secretary-General: United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice. Von Broemsen, Marlese. 2020. Realizing the New Urban Agenda’s ideal of social inclusion: street vendors’ participation in decision-making about the use of public space. In Law and the New Urban Agenda, Nestor Davidson and Geeta Tewari (eds.). New York: Routledge.