Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success

Journal of Applied Ecology - Tập 48 Số 1 - Trang 210-219 - 2011
Wouter Halfwerk1, Leonard J. M. Holleman2, C. M. Lessells2, Hans Slabbekoorn1
1Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands
2Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW), 6666 ZG Heteren, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Summary1. Traffic affects large areas of natural habitat worldwide. As a result, the acoustic signals used by birds and other animals are increasingly masked by traffic noise. Masking of signals important to territory defence and mate attraction may have a negative impact on reproductive success. Depending on the overlap in space, time and frequency between noise and vocalizations, such impact may ultimately exclude species from suitable breeding habitat. However a direct impact of traffic noise on reproductive success has not previously been reported.2. We monitored traffic noise and avian vocal activity during the breeding season alongside a busy Dutch motorway. We measured variation in space, time and spectrum of noise and tested for negative effects on avian reproductive success using long‐term breeding data on great tits Parus major.3. Noise levels decreased with distance from the motorway, but we also found substantial spatial variation independent of distance. Noise also varied temporally with March being noisier than April, and the daytime being noisier than night‐time. Furthermore, weekdays were clearly noisier than weekends. Importantly, traffic noise overlapped in time as well as acoustic frequency with avian vocalization behaviour over a large area.4. Traffic noise had a negative effect on reproductive success with females laying smaller clutches in noisier areas. Variation in traffic noise in the frequency band that overlaps most with the lower frequency part of great tit song best explained the observed variation.5. Additionally, noise levels recorded in April had a negative effect on the number of fledglings, independent of clutch size, and explained the observed variation better than noise levels recorded in March.6.Synthesis and applications. We found that breeding under noisy conditions can carry a cost, even for species common in urban areas. Such costs should be taken into account when protecting threatened species, and we argue that knowledge of the spatial, temporal and spectral overlap between noise and species‐specific acoustic behaviour will be important for effective noise management. We provide some cost‐effective mitigation measures such as traffic speed reduction or closing of roads during the breeding season.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00499.x

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00973.x

10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.019

Bradbury J.W., 1998, Principles of Animal Communication

Brumm H., 2005, Advances in the Study of Behavior, 151

Bucur V., 2006, Urban Forest Acoustics

Burnham K.P., 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical‐Theoretic Approach

10.1017/CBO9780511754791

Drent P.J., 1987, The importance of nestboxes for territory settlement, survival and density of the great tit, ARDEA, 75, 59

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99299.x

10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052

10.1093/beheco/arp137

Groot Bruinderink G.W.T.A. Brandjes G.J. van Eekelen R. Niewold F.J.J. ten Den P.G.A.&Waardenburg H.W.(2002)Faunabeheerplan Nationaal Park Sallandse Heuvelrug i.o. Alterra Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte Wageningen.

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01234.x

10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.015

10.1098/rspb.2009.1222

10.1007/BF01651222

Kluyver H.N., 1951, The population ecology of the great tit, Parus major L, ARDEA, 39, 1

Laube M.M., 2000, Grand Canyon National Park – assessment of transportation alternatives, Transit: Planning, Intermodal Facilities, Management, and Marketing, 1735, 59

10.1093/beheco/arm161

10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00066-4

10.1121/1.2769972

10.1098/rspb.2009.0586

10.1121/1.3129125

10.1121/1.1629304

10.5751/ES-02761-140129

10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.005

10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03781.x

10.1007/BF01640537

10.2307/2404428

10.1242/jeb.022863

10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008

10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.002

10.1038/424267a

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03487.x

10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00030-X

10.2752/089279300786999680

10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01007.x

10.1007/BF00300047

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01078.x

10.1016/0006-3207(80)90006-3