Neck Vessel Cross‐Sectional Area Measured with MRI: Scan‐Rescan Reproducibility for Longitudinal Evaluations

Journal of Neuroimaging - Tập 28 Số 1 - Trang 48-56 - 2018
Laura Pelizzari1,2, Maria Marcella Laganà2, Dejan Jakimovski3, Niels Bergsland3, Jesper Hagemeier3, Giuseppe Baselli1, Robert Zivadinov3,4
1Department of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
2IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
3Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
4Translational Imaging Center at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTBACKGROUND AND PURPOSEThe cross‐sectional area (CSA) of common carotid arteries‐internal carotid arteries (CCA‐ICAs), vertebral arteries (VAs), and internal jugular veins (IJVs) is influenced by aging. However, the neck vessel CSA can be affected by other factors as well, including subject positioning, hydration, and respiration, especially in longitudinal studies. This study aimed to assess scan‐rescan reproducibility of CCA‐ICAs, VAs, and IJVs CSA measurements in order to evaluate their feasibility for longitudinal CSA assessments, and to apply the segmentation method on a longitudinal pilot dataset.METHODSTwo set of 2‐dimensional neck magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images were acquired on a 3‐T scanner from two separate datasets: 9 healthy individuals (HIs) were scanned 5 days apart (scan‐rescan dataset) and 12 HIs were acquired 5 years apart (baseline‐follow‐up dataset). CCA‐ICAs, VAs, and IJVs were segmented along the whole vessel length between C3 and C7 intervertebral spaces. Repeated measure analysis of covariance, adjusted for cervical level and sample, and Wilcoxon signed‐rank sum test were used to assess the scan‐rescan and baseline‐follow‐up CSA differences. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also computed to evaluate scan‐rescan reliability.RESULTSNo significant CSA differences were found for the scan‐rescan and baseline‐follow‐up CSA comparisons, using the whole vessel length or single cervical level measurements. ICC analysis showed good degree of scan‐rescan reproducibility (considering whole vessel measures: ICC > .9, P‐value < .001 for CCA‐ICAs, ICC > .6, P‐value < .001 for VAs, and ICC > .7, P‐value < .001 for IJVs).CONCLUSIONSScan‐rescan reproducibility of CCA‐ICAs, VAs, and IJVs CSA measurements is high, making longitudinal studies feasible.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cipolla MJ, 2009, The Cerebral Circulation, 1

10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.04.005

Shipley RE, 1944, The effect of external constriction of a blood vessel on blood flow, Am J Physiol, 141, 289, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1944.141.2.289

Holt JP., 1969, Flow through collapsible tubes and through in situ veins, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 4, 274, 10.1109/TBME.1969.4502659

Marcotti S, 2015, An anatomy‐based lumped parameter model of cerebrospinal venous circulation: can an extracranial anatomical change impact intracranial hemodynamics, BMC Neurol, 15, 95, 10.1186/s12883-015-0352-y

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.02.009

Belov P, 2018, Lower arterial cross‐sectional area of carotid and vertebral arteries and higher frequency of secondary neck vessels are associated with multiple sclerosis, AJNR

10.1136/jnnp.2008.157164

10.1371/journal.pone.0153960

10.1016/j.jvir.2011.09.027

10.1186/1471-2377-13-94

10.1002/ana.21410

Ciccone MM, 2017, Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and Meniere syndrome: the role of cerebral venous drainage, Clin Otolaryngol

Czyzewska D, 2015, Ultrasound assessment of the jugular and vertebral veins in healthy individuals: selected physiological aspects and morphological parameters, J Ultrason, 15, 267

10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00029-5

Yasuda E, 2010, Assessment of cross‐sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time‐of‐flight MR angiography and CT angiography, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, 67, 367, 10.6009/jjrt.67.367

10.1053/j.jvca.2012.10.007

10.1186/cc8200

Lagana MM, 2016, Assessment of internal jugular vein size in healthy subjects with magnetic resonance and semiautomatic processing, Behav Neurol, 2016, 9717210, 10.1155/2016/9717210

10.1007/s003300050483

10.1055/s-0035-1556056

10.1371/journal.pone.0149532

10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00082-3

10.2214/AJR.15.14689

10.1097/00003246-199112000-00013

10.1093/ndt/13.1.134

10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2017

10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04804-7

Onal O, 2015, The effectiveness of trendelenburg positioning on the cross‐sectional area of the right internal jugular vein in obese patients, Pak J Med Sci, 31, 770

Belov P, 2017, Age‐related brain atrophy may be mitigated by internal jugular vein enlargement in male individuals without neurologic disease, Phlebology, 32, 125, 10.1177/0268355516633610

10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.041

10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00293-3

Kappus N, 2016, Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased lesion burden and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 87, 181

10.1148/radiol.2016160060

Zivadinov R, 2016, Leptomeningeal contrast enhancement is associated with progression of cortical atrophy in MS: a retrospective, pilot, observational longitudinal study, Mult Scler, 23, 1336, 10.1177/1352458516678083

10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6

10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

10.1002/0471445428.ch18

Cicchetti DV, 1981, Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior, Am J Ment Defic, 86, 127

10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.012

10.1161/01.ATV.13.1.90

10.1016/0301-5629(94)00090-5

10.1007/BF01654447