Necessary costs and expenditure incentives under the English rule

International Review of Law and Economics - Tập 22 Số 2 - Trang 133-152 - 2002
Charles E. Hyde1, Philip L. Williams2
1Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and University of Melbourne, P.O. Box N250, Grosvenor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney, NSW 1217, Australia
2Melbourne Business School, 200 Leicester St, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bebchuk, 1984, Litigation and settlement under imperfect information, Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 404, 10.2307/2555448

Bowles, 1987, Settlement range and cost allocation rules: A comment on Avery Katz’s measuring the demand for litigation: Is the English rule really cheaper?, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 177

Braeutigam, 1984, An economic analysis of alternative fee-shifting systems, Law and Contemporary Problems, 47, 173, 10.2307/1191439

Bulow, 1985, Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 488, 10.1086/261312

Cook, M. J. (1991). Cook on costs: A guide to legal remuneration in civil contentious and non-contentious business. Butterworths, London.

Cooter, 1989, Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution, Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1067

Gong, 2000, Pre-trial negotiation, litigation, and procedural rules, Law and Contemporary Problems, 38, 218

Gould, 1973, The economics of legal conflicts, Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 279, 10.1086/467499

Hause, 1989, Indemnity, settlement, and litigation, or, I’ll be suing you, Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 157, 10.1086/468144

Katz, 1987, Measuring the demand for litigation: Is the English rule really cheaper?, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 143

Katz, 1988, Judicial decision making and litigation expenditure, International Review of Law and Economics, 8, 127, 10.1016/0144-8188(88)90001-4

Landes, 1971, An economic analysis of the courts, Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 61, 10.1086/466704

Pfennigstorf, 1984, The European experience with attorney fee-shifting, Law and Contemporary Problems, 47, 37, 10.2307/1191436

Plott, 1987, Legal fees: A comparison of the American and English rules, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 185

Png, 1983, Strategic behavior in suit, settlement, and trial, Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 539, 10.2307/3003655

Posner, 1972, An economic approach to legal procedure and judicial administration, Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 399, 10.1086/467503

Priest, 1984, The selection of disputes for litigation, Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 1, 10.1086/467732

Reinganum, 1986, Settlement and litigation and the alloction of litigation costs, Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 557, 10.2307/2555481

Rubinfeld, D., & Perloff, J. (1988). Settlements in Private Antitrust Litigation. Lawrence J. White, ed., Private Antitrust Litigation: New Evidence, New Meaning, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Santore, R., & Viard, A. (1999). Legal fee restrictions, moral hazard, and attorney profits. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Paper 99-12.

Shavell, 1982, Suit, settlement and trial: A theoretical analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal cost, Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 55, 10.1086/467692

Spier, 1994, Pre-trial bargaining and the design of fee-shifting rules, Rand Journal of Economics, 25, 197, 10.2307/2555827