Near-surface atmospheric electric field changes through magnetic clouds via coronal mass ejections

Lei Li1, Tao Chen1, Chao Shen2, Shuo Ti1, Shihan Wang1, Chunlin Cai1, Wen Li1, Jing Luo1
1State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
2School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The Earth’s electrical environment is influenced by both external and internal driving factors. Internal driving factors include the global charging current produced by lightning storms, global aerosol concentrations and cloud coverage. External factors are caused by various space weather phenomena, including changes in the Sun’s magnetic field, solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and ionization changes from high-energy particles from the Sun and galactic cosmic rays. This study focuses on the cosmic ray intensity changes observed at the OULU Station and the vertical atmospheric electric field changes observed at the Azores and Studenec stations during a solar activity event in September 2017. The results indicate that the atmospheric electric field at the two stations (Azores and Studenec) simultaneously decreased by 80% and 120% of the mean atmospheric electric field value, respectively, during the same time as the significant decrease in cosmic ray intensity. The linear correlation coefficient between the decreased atmospheric electric field measured at these two stations was 0.60, indicating a global effect from the shocks and magnetic clouds associated with coronal mass ejections on atmospheric electricity. Finally, this study describes shock waves and magnetic clouds that impede the propagation of galactic cosmic rays, resulting in a decrease in ionospheric potential and atmospheric electric field.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alemanno F, An Q, Azzarello P et al (2021) Observations of Forbush decreases of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons with the dark matter particle explorer. Astrophys J Letters 920(2):L43

Anisimov SV, Shikhova NM, Kleimenova NG (2021) Response of a magnetospheric storm in the atmospheric electric field of the midlatitudes. Geomag Aeron 61(2):180–190

Blasi P (2013) The origin of galactic cosmic rays. Astron Astrophys Rev 21:70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0070-7

Bothmer V, Daglis IA (2007) Space weather: physics and effects. Springer, Berlin

Cane HV (2000) (1999) Coronal mass ejections and Forbush decreases [C]//Cosmic Rays and Earth: Proceedings of an ISSI Workshop. Springer, Bern, pp 55–77

Guo J (2018) Measurements of Forbush decreases at Mars: both by MSL on ground and by MAVEN in orbit. Astron Astrophys. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732087

Harrison RG (2004) The global atmospheric electrical circuit and climate. Surv Geophys 25:441–484

Harrison RG, Nicoll KA (2018) Fair weather criteria for atmospheric electricity measurements. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 179:239–250

Jingqun S (1987) Basics of atmospheric electricity. Meteorological Press, Beijing

Kamide Y, Yokoyama N, Gonzalez W et al (1998) Two-step development of geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res Space Phys 103(A4):6917–6921

Kharayat H, Prasad L, Mathpal R et al (2016) Study of cosmic ray intensity in relation to the interplanetary magnetic field and geomagnetic storms for solar cycle 23. Sol Phys 291:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0852-y

Kudela K, Storini M, Hofer MY et al (2000) Cosmic rays in relation to space weather. Space Sci Rev 93(1–2):153

Lara A, Gopalswamy N, Caballero-López RA et al (2005) Coronal mass ejections and galactic cosmic-ray modulation. Astrophys J 625(1):441

Le G (2002) Study on the precursor characteristics of the galactic cosmic ray intensity changes before geomagnetic storms. National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

Lingri D, Mavromichalaki H, Belov A et al (2016) Solar activity parameters and associated Forbush decreases during the minimum between cycles 23 and 24 and the ascending phase of cycle 24. Sol Phys 291:1025–1041

Nicoll KA (2014) Space weather influences on atmospheric electricity. Weather 69(9):238–241

Oh SY, Yi Y, Kim YH (2008) Globally nonsimultaneous Forbush decrease events and their implications. J Geophy Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012333

Potgieter MS (2013) Solar modulation of cosmic rays. Living Rev Sol Phys 10:1–66

Rycroft MJ, Israelsson S, Price C (2000) The global atmospheric electric circuit, solar activity and climate change. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 62(17–18):1563–1576

Rycroft MJ, Harrison RG, Nicoll KA et al (2008) An overview of Earth’s global electric circuit and atmospheric conductivity. Planet Atmos Electr 30:83–105

Sanchez-Garcia E, Aguilar-Rodriguez E, Ontiveros V et al (2017) Geoeffectiveness of stream interaction regions during 2007–2008. Space Weather 15(8):1052–1067

Shumilov OI, Kasatkina EA, Frank-Kamenetsky AV (2015) Effects of extraordinary solar cosmic ray events on variations in the atmospheric electric field at high latitudes. Geomag Aeron 55:650–657

Smirnov S (2014) Reaction of electric and meteorological states of the near-ground atmosphere during a geomagnetic storm on 5 April 2010. Earth Planets Space 66(1):1–8

Tacza J, Raulin JP, Mendonca RRS et al (2018) Solar effects on the atmospheric electric field during 2010–2015 at low latitudes. J Geophys ResAtmosp 123(21):11970–11979

Yermolaev YI, Lodkina IG, Nikolaeva NS et al (2014) Influence of the interplanetary driver type on the durations of the main and recovery phases of magnetic storms. J Geophys Res Space Phys 119(10):8126–8136

Zhang J, Richardson IG, Webb DF et al (2007) Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms (Dst100 nT) during 1996–2005. J Geophys Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012321