Navigating the labyrinth: Academic scientists’ responses to new regulatory controls on biological material inputs to research

Akers, 1990, Rational choice, deterrence and social learning theory in criminology: the path not taken, J. Crim. Law Criminol., 81, 653, 10.2307/1143850 Atlas, 2003, Bioterrorism and biodefence research: changing the focus of microbiology, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 1, 70, 10.1038/nrmicro728 Battilana, 2009, How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship, Acad. Manag. Ann., 3, 65, 10.5465/19416520903053598 Bretting, 2007, The U.S. National PLANT GERMPLASM system in an era of shifting international norms for GERMPLASM EXCHANGE, Acta Hortic., 760, 55, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.5 Byerlee, 2009, Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration, Int. J. Commons, 4, 452, 10.18352/ijc.147 Carlough, 2003 Chakraborty, 2011, Climate change, plant diseases and food security: an overview, Plant Pathol., 60, 2, 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02411.x Cock, 2010, Do New Access and Benefit Sharing Procedures Under the Convention on Biological Diversity Threaten the Future of Biological Control?, BioControl, 55, 199, 10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9 Corbin, 2014 De Greef, 2004, The Cartagena Protocol and the future of agbiotech, Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 811, 10.1038/nbt0704-811 DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, Am. Sociol. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 DiMaggio, 1991, Introduction, 1 Esquinas-Alcázar, 2005, Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 946, 10.1038/nrg1729 Friedland, 1991, Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions, 232 Grajal, 1999, Biodiversity and the nation state: regulating access to genetic resources limits biodiversity research in developing countries, Conserv. Biol., 13, 6, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013001006.x Greenwood, 2011, Institutional complexity and organizational responses, Acad. Manag. Ann., 5, 317, 10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 Howlett, 2018, Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design, Policy Polit., 46, 101, 10.1332/030557317X15053060139376 Jarvis, 2010, Institutional processes and regulatory risk: a case study of the Thai energy sector, Regul. Gov., 4, 175, 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01077.x Jinnah, 2009, Could Access Requirements Stifle Your Research?, Science, 323, 464, 10.1126/science.1167234 Kaine, 2010, A framework for understanding individual response to regulation, Food Policy, 35, 531, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.06.002 Kaghan, 2011, Institutions and work, J. Manag. Inq., 20, 73, 10.1177/1056492610387225 Kuckartz, 2014 Lawrence, 2009, Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work, 1 Lawrence, 2011, Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization, J. Manag. Inq., 20, 52, 10.1177/1056492610387222 Martinez, 2010, Scientists — take action for access to biodiversity, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2, 27, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.004 Mathieu, 2017, Measuring multi‐level regulatory governance: organizational proliferation, coordination, and concentration of influence, Regul. Gov., 11, 252, 10.1111/rego.12127 Meyer, 1977, Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony, Am. J. Sociol., 83, 340, 10.1086/226550 Nagin, 2001, Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: theory and evidence, Criminology, 39, 865, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00943.x Oliver, 1991, Strategic responses to institutional processes, Acad. Manag. Rev., 16, 145, 10.2307/258610 Ostrom, 1990 Ostrom, 2007, institutional rational choice. An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework, 21 Pache, 2013, Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics, Acad. Manag. J., 56, 972, 10.5465/amj.2011.0405 Pfeffer, 1978 Rosegrant, 2003, Global food security: challenges and policies, Science, 302, 1917, 10.1126/science.1092958 Rosendal, 2006, Balancing access and benefit sharing and legal protection of innovations from bioprospecting impacts on conservation of biodiversity, J. Environ. Dev., 15, 428, 10.1177/1070496506294799 Rosendal, 2006, Regulating the use of genetic resources – between international authorities, Eur. Environ., 16, 265, 10.1002/eet.424 Rubin, 2011 Scott, 2013 Scott, 2006 Sebastian, 2006, NARES capacity in relation to international treaties and conventions on intellectual property rights, agricultural biotechnology, and plant genetic resources management, Asian J. Agric. Dev., 4 Sebastian, 2009, Implications of the treaties TRIPS, CBD and ITPGRFA on public agricultural R&D in the Philippines, Philipp. Agric. Sci., 91 Shibayama, 2011, Sharing research tools in academia: the case of Japan, Sci. Public Policy, 38, 649, 10.3152/030234211X13122939587699 Ten Kate, 2002, Science and the convention on biological diversity, Science, 295, 2371, 10.1126/science.1070725 Ten Kate, 1999 Thornton, 1999, Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958‐1990, Am. J. Sociol., 105, 801, 10.1086/210361 Toledo, 2006, Biodiversity and nutrition: a common path toward global food security and sustainable development, J. Food Compos. Anal., 19, 477, 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.05.001 Tsoukas, 1997, Marginalization and recovery: the emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies, Organ. Stud., 18, 655, 10.1177/017084069701800405 Wagner, 2005, Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science, Res. Policy, 34, 1608, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002 Welch, 2013, Potential effects of the Nagoya Protocol on the exchange of non-plant genetic resources for scientific research: actors, paths, and consequences, Ecol. Econ., 86, 136, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.019 Welch, 2017, Genetic resource policies in international collaborative research for food and agriculture: A study of USAID-funded innovation labs, Global Food Secur., 15, 33, 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.004 Ziman, 2000