National survey on the opinions of French specialists in assisted reproductive technologies about social issues impacting the future revision of the French Bioethics laws

Hélène Creux1,2, Marie Diaz1, Michaël Grynberg3,4, Aline Papaxanthos-Roche1, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux1, Clément Jimenez1, Sandrine Frantz1, Nicolas Chevalier2, Janet Takefman5, Claude Hocké1
1Department of reproductive medicine, Bordeaux University Hospital, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France
2Reproductive Center, Polyclinique Saint Roch, 550 avenue du colonel André Pavelet, 34070 Montpellier, France
3Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France
4Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill UniversityHealth Center Reproductive Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Shenfield, 2010, Cross-border reproductive care in six European countries, Hum Reprod Update, 25, 1361, 10.1093/humrep/deq057 Merlet, 2010, Egg donation: regulation of the donation and the hidden face of the cross-border reproductive care, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 38, 36, 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.11.008 De Melo-Martin, 2017, How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?, Reprod Biomed Soc Online, 3, 100, 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003 Rozée-Gomez, 2013, Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium, Hum Reprod, 28, 3103, 10.1093/humrep/det326 Riggs, 2014, Gay fathers’ reproductive journeys and parenting experiences: a review of research, J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 40, 289, 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100670 Timms, 2018, Ending commercial surrogacy in India: significance of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016, Indian J Med Ethics, 3, 99 Fond, 2012, Homosexual parenthood and child development: present data, Encephale, 38, 10, 10.1016/j.encep.2011.05.005 Farr, 2013, Co-parenting among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples: associations with adopted children’s outcomes, Child Dev, 84, 1226, 10.1111/cdev.12046 2013, Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril, 100 Golombok, 2016, Single mothers by choice: mother-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment, J Fam Psychol, 30, 409, 10.1037/fam0000188 Gleicher, 2018, Older women using their own eggs? Issue framed with two oldest reported IVF pregnancies and a live birth, Reprod Biomed Online, 37, 172, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.010 Gunnala, 2018, One thousand seventy-eight autologous IVF cycles in women 45 years and older the largest single-center cohort to date, J Assist Reprod Genet, 35, 435, 10.1007/s10815-017-1088-y Forman, 2012, Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting, Fertil Steril, 98, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.028 Chian, 2014, Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress and future goals, J Assist Reprod Genet, 31, 411, 10.1007/s10815-014-0180-9 Cobo, 2016, Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation, Fertil Steril, 105, 755, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.027 Garcia-Velasco, 2013, Five years’ experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications, Fertil Steril, 99, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.004 Devine, 2015, Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in womendelaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth, Fertil Steril, 103, 1446, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.029 Stoop, 2015, Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers, Hum Reprod, 30, 338, 10.1093/humrep/deu317 Dahdouh, 2015, Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis, Fertil Steril, 104, 1503, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038 Lee, 2015, The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review, Hum Reprod, 30, 473, 10.1093/humrep/deu303 Verpoest, 2018, Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial, Hum Reprod, 33, 1767, 10.1093/humrep/dey262 Vaiarelli, 2016, Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?, J Assist Reprod Genet, 33, 1273, 10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2 Scott, 2013, Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial, Fertil Steril, 100, 624, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039 Kort, 2012, Pregnancy after age 50: defining risks for mother and child, Am J Perinatol, 29, 245, 10.1055/s-0031-1285101 Daar, 2016, (Ethics committee of the ASRM). Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced reproductive age: an Ethics Committee opinion, Fertil Steril, 106, e3, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.002