Nation-Building and the Governance of Emerging Technologies: the Case of Nanotechnology in India

World Bank (2006) Governance matters 2006. Worldwide governance indicators. A decade of measuring the quality of governance. The World Bank, Washington D.C. Pierre J (2000) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford Zumbansen P (2012) Governance: an interdisciplinary perspective. In: Levi-Faur D (ed) The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–96 Levi-Faur D (2012) The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford Krabbenborg L (2013) DuPont and environmental defense fund co-constructing a risk framework for nanoscale materials: an occasion to reflect on interaction processes in a joint inquiry. NanoEthics 7:45–54 Cormick C (2012) The complexity of public engagement. Nat Nanotechnol 7:77–78 Rip A, Van Lente H (2013) Bridging the gap between innovation and ELSA: the TA program in the Dutch nano-R&D program NanoNed. NanoEthics 7:7–16 Kjølberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1:89–104 Beumer K (2016) Nanotechnology and development. Styles of governance in India, South Africa, and Kenya. Maastricht University Press, Maastricht Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton Halffman W (2005) Science-policy boundaries: national styles? Sci and Public Policy 32:457–467 Vogel D (1986) National styles of regulation: environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca Kelman S (1981) Regulating America, regulating Sweden: a comparative study of occupational safety and health policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Löfstedt RE, Vogel D (2001) The changing character of regulation: a comparison of Europe and the United States. Risk Anal 21:399–405 Hobsbawm E, Ranger T (1983) The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Anderson B (1991) Imagined communities. Verso, London Hecht G (2009) The radiance of France. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Moon S (2009) Justice, geography, and steel: technology and national identity in Indonesian industrialization. Osiris 24:253–277 Edwards PN, Hecht G (2010) History and the technopolitics of identity: the case of apartheid South Africa. J Southern African Studies 36:619–639 Basalla G (1967) The spread of Western science. Science 156:611–622 Hayden C (2005) Bioprospecting’s representational dilemma. Sci as Culture 14:185–200 Turnbull D (2000) Rationality and the disunity of the science. In: Selin H (ed) Mathematics across cultures. The history of non-Western mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 37–54 Chakrabarty D (2007) Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton Tilley H (2011) (2010) Global histories, vernacular science, and African genealogies; or, is the history of science ready for the world? Isis 101:110–119 Pollock A (2014) Places of pharmaceutical knowledge-making: global health, postcolonial science, and hope in South African drug discovery. Soc Stud of Sci 44:848–873 Huang C, Notten A, Rasters NJ (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transfer 36:145–172 Beumer K, Bhattacharya S (2013) Emerging technologies in India: developments, debates and silences about nanotechnology. Sci Public Policy 40:628–643 StatNano (2017). Ranking of countries in nanotechnology publications in 2016. http://statnano.com/news/57105. Accessed 13 Sept 2018 Krige J, Wang J (2015) Nation, knowledge, and imagined futures: science, technology, and nation-building, post-1945. Hist Technol 31:171–179 Roco MC (2005) International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. J Nanopart Res 7:707–712 Cozzens SE et al (2010) Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement. Tech Anal Strat Manag 22:361–376 Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology / building society. Studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–224 Saraiva T (2007) Inventing the technological nation: the example of Portugal (1851-1898). Hist Technol 23:263–273 Olarte Sierra MF, Del Castillo Hernández AD (2013) ‘We are all the same, we all are Mestizos’: imagined populations and nations in genetics research in Colombia. Sci as Culture 23:226–252 Kent M, García-Deister V, López-Beltrán C, Ventura Santos R, Schwartz-Marín E, Wade P (2015) Building the genomic nation: ‘homo brasilis’ and the ‘genoma mexicano’ in comparative cultural perspective. Soc Stud of Sci 45:839–861 Schwartz-Marín E, Wade P, Cruz-Santiago A, Cárdenas R (2015) Colombian forensic genetics as a form of public science: the role of race, nation and common sense in the stabilization of DNA populations. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45:862–885 Landström C (2005) ‘A more authentic Australia’: cultural narratives in biological control research. Sci. as Culture 14:59–75 Bijker WE (1995) Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Bijker WE, Law J (1992) Shaping technology / building society. Studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Asthana P (2011) Nano research in India. Some encouraging trends. Nano Digest 14–17 Planning Commission (2008) Eleventh five year plan (2007-2012), volume III. Agriculture, rural development, industry, services, and physical infrastructure. Oxford University Press, New Delhi Raina D (2003) Images and contexts: the historiography of science and modernity in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi Prakash G (1999) Another reason: science and the imagination of modern India. Princeton University Press, Princeton Ram A (1961) The making of optical glass in India: its lessons for industrial development. Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar memorial lecture. http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/rawdataupload/upload/insa/INSA_1/20005aca_531.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2013 Arnold D (2000) The new Cambridge history of India. Science, technology and medicine in colonial India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Abraham I (2006) The ambivalence of nuclear histories. Osiris 21:49–65 Visvanathan S (1997) A carnival for science: essays on science, technology and development. Oxford University Press, New Delhi Hinterberger A (2013) Curating postcolonial critique. Soc. Stud. Sci. 43:619–627 Beumer K (2015) The co-production of nanotechnology and development in India, South Africa, and Kenya. In: Bowman DM, Dijkstra A, Fautz C, Guivant J, Konrad K, van Lente H, Woll S (eds) Practices of innovation and responsibility. Insights from methods, governance and action. IOS Press / AKA, Berlin, pp 85–98 Bürgi B, Pradeep T (2006) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology in developing countries. Curr Sci 90:645–658 Kalam APJ (2012) Turning points. A journey through challenges. HarperCollins Publishers India, New Delhi The Energy and Resource Institute (2009) Nanotechnology developments in India: a status report. Project report no. 2006ST21: D5. The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi Chandra P, Narasimhan G (2005) Nanotechnology in India: government support, market acceptance and patent profile. Nanotechnology, Law & Business 2:289–293 Kalam APJ, Rajan YS (2002[1998]) India 2020. A vision for the new millennium. Penguin Books, London Newswire (2006) India tops in nanotechnology related Google™ search. Newswire. http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/6765/. Accessed 28 Oct 2013 World Bank (1998/1999) World development report 1998/1999. Knowledge for development. World Bank, Washington D.C. OECD (2004) Global knowledge flows and economic development. OECD, Paris UNCTAD (2007) The least developed countries report 2007. Knowledge, technological learning and innovation for development. UNCTAD, Geneva Chang H-J (2002) Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press, London Digest N (2009) Small tech. Big potential. Nano Digest 1:16–18 Hullman A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1:81–83 Press Trust of India (2006) India cannot afford to miss revolution in nanotechnology: Rao. Outlook India. http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=346054. Accessed 28 October 2013 Government of India (2008) About Nano Mission. http://web.archive.org/web/20080127181557/http:/nanomission.gov.in/. Accessed 27 March 2015 Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Throw M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123 Mashelkar RA (2005) India’s R&D: reaching for the top. Science 307:1415–1417 Mashelkar RA (2008) Indian science, technology, and society: the changing landscape. Technol Soc 30:299–308 Confederation of Indian Industry, Department of Science and Technology (2010) The nanotechnology conclave. The retrospect. http://www.tntdpc.com/nanotech_2011/ntconclavetill2010.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2015 Anand M, Sarma SD (2013) Emerging innovation systems of nanotechnology in India. In: Sarma SD, Anand M (eds) Capabilities and governance of nanotechnology in the developing world. Insights from India. TERI Press, New Delhi, pp 7–40 Abraham I (1998) The making of the Indian atomic bomb. Zed Books, London Raina D (2002) The naturalization of modern science in South Asia: a historical overview of the processes of domestication and globalization. In: Renn J (ed) The globalization of knowledge in history. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, Stuttgart, pp 345–366 Sharma D (2000) Science, culture and conflict in India. Cult Dyn 12:164–181 Rip A (2010) NanoNed. In: Guston DH (ed) Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. Sage, London, pp 511–512 Krishnadas K (2007) India rolls out nanotech initiative. EE Times. http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1167576. Accessed 1 Feb 2013 Bhattacharya S, Pushkaran JA, Shilpa BM (2012) Knowledge creation and innovation in nanotechnology: contemporary and emerging scenario in India. CSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi Robinson KD (2010) Constructive technology assessment of emerging nanotechnologies. Experiments in interactions. Dissertation, Twente University Press, Enschede Rip A (2010) Nanotechnology for a knowledge society – in Europe. Paper presented at the second ICPC-Nanonet webinar. http://www.nanopodium.nl/CieMDN/content/Presentation_ArieRip.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2013 O’Neill J (2001) Building better global economics BRICs. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper 66, New York Zakaria F (2006) India rising. Newsweek. http://www.scribd.com/doc/152899743/Zakaria-India-Rising. Accessed 19 April 2015 Mahbubani K (2008) The new Asian hemisphere. The irresistible shift of global power to the East. Public Affairs, New York Planning Commission (2001) India as knowledge superpower. Strategy for transformation task force report. New Concept Information Systems Pvt. Ltd, Noida Kalam APJ (2002) Ignited minds: unleashing the power within India. Penguin Global, London Bound K (2007) India: the uneven innovator. DEMOS, London New Scientist (2005) India special: the next knowledge superpower. New Scientist, 16 February 2005 Press Trust of India (2012) Students can make India a knowledge superpower.http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-06-10/news/32156151_1_knowledge-superpower-student-community-baramati. Accessed 28 October 2013 Bhatia B (2012) India, a knowledge super power. Times of India. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-06-04/news/32033005_1_higher-education-national-knowledge-knowledge-network. Accessed 24 June 2015 UNESCO (2010) UNESCO science report 2010. The current status of science around the world. UNESCO, Paris UNESCO (2015) UNESCO science report: towards 2030. UNESCO, Paris Das P (2006) Can lead knowledge revolution. The Hindu, 30 November 2015. Accessed 24 June 2015 Planning Commission (2006) Report of the steering committee on science and technology for the eleventh five year plan. http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/strgrp11/str11_sandt.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016 Salamanca-Buentello F, Persad DL, Court EB, Martin DK, Daar AS, Singer PA (2005) Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Med 2:383–386 UNESCO (2005) UNESCO science report 2005. UNESCO, Paris