Nanotechnology in the marketplace: how the nanotechnology industry views risk

Baumgartner L, Carr B, Fish A, Meyerhofer J (2010) Current practices and perceived risks for environmental, health, safety and product stewardship in the nanomaterials industry. Masters Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara

Bernard RH (2006) Research methods in anthropology, 4th edn. AltaMira Press, Oxford, pp 189–193

Charmaz K (2011) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through quantitative analysis. Sage Publications, London

Collins H (1981) Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Soc Stud Sci 11:3–10

Conti JA, Killpack K, Gerritzen G, Huang L, Mircheva M, Delmas M, Harthorn BH, Appelbaum RP, Holden PA (2008) Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: results from an international survey. Environ Sci Technol 42:3155–3162

Corbin J, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13:3–21

Corley EA, Scheufele DA, Hu Q (2009) Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11:1573–1585

Dunphy-Guzmán KA, Taylor MA, Banfield JF (2006) Environmental risks of nanotechnology: national nanotechnology initiative funding, 2000–2004. Environ Sci Technol 40:1401–1407

Engeman CD, Baumgartner L, Carr BM, Fish AM, Meyerhofer JD, Satterfield TA, Holden PA, Harthorn BH (2012) Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. J Nanopart Res 14:1–12

Fairborther A, Fairbrother JR (2009) Are environmental regulations keeping up with innovation? A case study of the nanotechnology industry. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:1327–1330

Gieryn T (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 48:781–795

Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago

Gruère GP (2011) Labelling nano-enabled consumer products. Nano Today 6:117–121

Handy RD, Shaw BJ (2007) Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:125–144

Hansen SF, Maynard A, Baun A, Tickner JA (2008) Late lessons from early warnings for nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 3:444–447

Hardman R (2006) A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environ Health Perspect 114:165–172

Helland A, Scheringer M, Siegrist M, Kastenholz HG, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2008) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a survey of industrial approaches. Environ Sci Technol 42:640–646

Kraus N, Malmfors T, Slovic P (1992) Intuitive toxicology: expert and lay judgments of chemical risks. Risk Anal 12:215–232

Lux Research (2007) The nanotech report: investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 5th edn, New York

MacKenzie D (2009) Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Account Org Soc 34:440–455

Miyazaki K, Islam N (2007) Nanotechnology systems of innovation—an analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation 27:661–675

National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (2007) What is nanotechnology? http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/whatIsNano.html . Accessed 5 Feb 2011

NCMS (2009) Study of nanotechnology in the U.S. manufacturing industry. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Ann Arbor

Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627

Oberdoerster G, Oberdoerster E, Oberdoerster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839

Ostrowski AD, Martin T, Conti J, Hurt I, Harthorn BH (2009) Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000–2007. J Nanopart Res 11:251–257

Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rodgers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95–98

Research Lux (2009) The recession’s ripple effect on nanotech. Lux Research, Inc., Boston

Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie C, Conti J, Harthorn BH (2009) Anticipating the perceived risks of nanotechnologies. Nat Nanotechnol 4:752–758

Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih TJ, Hillback E, Guston DH (2007) Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nanotechnol 2:732–734

Schmidt CW (2009) Nanotechnology-related environment, health, and safety research: examining the national strategy. Environ Health Perspect 117:A158–A161

Schummer J (2007) The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: a bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy. Scientometrics 70:669–692

Shapin S, Schaffer S (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: hobbes, boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Shapira P, Youtie J, Kay L (2011) National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. J Technol Transf 36:587–604

Slovic P, Malmfors T, Krewski D, Mertz CK, Neil N, Bartlett S (1995) Intuitive toxicology II. Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks in Canada. Risk Anal 15:661–675

Zhao QQ, Boxman A, Chowdhry U (2003) Nanotechnology in the chemical industry—opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 5:567–572