Naïve Realism and Phenomenal Intentionality

Allen, K. (2019). Merleau-Ponty and Naïve realism. Philosopher’s Imprint, 19(2) http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0019.002.

Berkeley, George. 1998. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Edited by Jonathan Dancy. Later prt. edition. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.

Block, N. (2010). Attention and mental Paint1. Philosophical Issues, 20(1), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2010.00177.x.

Bourget, David, and Angela Mendelovici. 2019. ‘Phenomenal Intentionality’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/phenomenal-intentionality/.

Byrne, Alex, and Heather Logue. 2008. ‘Either/or’. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, edited by Adrian haddock and Fiona Macpherson, 29:314–19. Oxford University Press.

Byrne, A., & Logue, H. (2009). Introduction. In A. Byrne & H. Logue (Eds.), Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. MIT Press.

Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and consciousness. Oxford University Press.

Engel, Mylan. n.d. ‘Epistemic luck | internet encyclopedia of philosophy’. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . https://www.iep.utm.edu/epi-luck/.

Fish, W. (2009). Perception, hallucination, and illusion. Oxford University Press.

French, C. (2018). VII—Naive realism and diaphaneity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 118(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy006.

Horgan, T., & Kriegel, U. (2008). Phenomenal intentionality meets the extended mind. The Monist, 91(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist20089128.

Johnston, M. (2006). Better than mere knowledge? The function of sensory awareness. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press.

Kalderon, M. E. (2011). Color Illusion. Noûs, 45(4), 751–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00781.x.

Kennedy, M. (2009). Heirs of nothing: The implications of transparency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(3), 574–604.

Kriegel, Uriah. 2013. ‘The phenomenal intentionality research program’. In Phenomenal Intentionality, edited by U. Kriegel, 1–26. Oxford University press.

Langsam, H. (2017). The intuitive case for Naïve realism. Philosophical Explorations, 20(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2016.1222627.

Logue, H. (2012a). What should the Naïve realist say about Total hallucinations? Philosophical Perspectives, 26(1), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12012.

Logue, H. (2012b). IX—Why naive realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 112(2pt2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x.

Logue, Heather. 2014. ‘Experiential content and naive realism: A reconciliation’. In Does Perception Have Content?, edited by Berit Brogaard, 220–41. Oxford UniversityPress.

Martin, M. G. F. (2000). Beyond dispute: Sense-data, intentionality, and the mind-body problem. In T. Crane & S. Patterson (Eds.), The History of the Mind-Body Problem. Routledge.

Martin, M. G. F. (2004). The limits of self-awareness. Philosophical Studies, 120(1–3), 37–89.

Masrour, F. (2016). Revisiting phenomenal intentionality. Rivista Internazionale Di Filosofia e Psicologia, 7(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.4453/rifp.2016.0010.

Mendelovici, A. (2018). The phenomenal basis of intentionality. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Moran, A. (2018). Naïve realism, hallucination, and causation: A new response to the screening off problem (pp. 1–15). April: Australasian Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2018.1458142.

Ott, W. (2016). Phenomenal intentionality and the problem of representation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(1), 131–145.

Parvizi, J., Jacques, C., Foster, B. L., Withoft, N., Rangarajan, V., Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2012). Electrical stimulation of human fusiform face-selective regions distorts face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(43), 14915–14920. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2609-12.2012.

Pautz, A. (2017). Experiences are representations: An empirical argument. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Perception (pp. 23–42). Routledge.

Raleigh, T. (2011). Visual experience & demonstrative thought. Disputatio, 4(30), 69–91.

Raleigh, T. (2015). Phenomenology without representation. European Journal of Philosophy, 23(4), 1209–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12047.

Rüttiger, L., Braun, D. I., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Petersen, D., Schönle, P., & Sharpe, L. T. (1999). Selective color Constancy deficits after circumscribed unilateral brain lesions. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(8), 3094–3106. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03094.1999.

Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44.

Travis, C. S. (2004). The silence of the senses. Mind, 113(449), 57–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/113.449.57.

Wilson, K. A. (2018). Are the senses silent? Travis’s argument from looks. In J. Collins & T. Dobler (Eds.), The philosophy of Charles Travis: Language, thought, and perception (pp. 199–221). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.