NIMBY, not, in siting community wind farms

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 57 - Trang 85-100 - 2019
Kevin Boyle1, Jessica Boatwright1, Sreeya Brahma1, Weibin Xu1
1Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, United States

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvarez-Farizo, 2002, Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms, An example from Spain. Energy Policy, 30, 107, 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00063-5

Aravena, 2008, Does money talk? The effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal values in a choice experiment, Paper Presented at the Workshop Empirical Methods in Energy Economics.

Bell, 2005, The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses, Env. Polit., 14, 460, 10.1080/09644010500175833

Bidwell, 2013, The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy, Energy Policy, 58, 189, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010

Burningham, 2000, Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research not an activity for researchers, Local Environ., 5, 55, 10.1080/135498300113264

Cassidy, 2013

Center for Hearing and Communication, 2013

Cohen, 2011, 342

Dear, 1977, Spatial externalities and locational conflict, London Papers in Regional Science, 7, 152

Dear, 1992, Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome, J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 58, 288, 10.1080/01944369208975808

Devine-Wright, 2005, Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy, Wind. Energy, 8, 125, 10.1002/we.124

Devlin, 2005, Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden, Wind. Eng., 29, 503, 10.1260/030952405776234580

Diekmann, 1985, Volunteer’s dilemma, J. Conflict Resolut., 29, 605, 10.1177/0022002785029004003

Dimitropoulos, 2009, Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands, Energy Policy, 37, 1842, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.002

Drechsler, 2011, Combining spatial modeling and choice experiments for the optimal spatial allocation of wind turbines, Energy Policy, 39, 3845, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.015

Edelstein, 2004, Sustainable innovation and the siting dilemma: thoughts on the stigmatization of projects and proponents, good and bad, J. Risk Res., 7, 233, 10.1080/1366987042000158730

Ek, 2002

Ek, 2005, Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power, Energy Policy, 33, 1677, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005

Fimereli, 2008

Fooks, 2017, Tourist viewshed externalities and wind energy production, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol., 46, 224, 10.1017/age.2017.18

Gallup Politics, 2012

Gipe, 1995

Groothuis, 2008, Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed, Energy Policy, 36, 1545, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.018

Heintzelman, 2012, Values in the wind: a hedonic analysis of wind power facilities, Land Econ., 88, 571, 10.3368/le.88.3.571

Hinman, 2010

Hoen, 2011, Wind energy facilities and residential properties: the effect of proximity and view on sales prices, Journal of Real Estate Research, 33, 279, 10.1080/10835547.2011.12091307

Hoen, 2015, Spatial hedonic analysis of the effects of US wind energy facilities on surrounding property values, J. Real Estate Financ. Econ., 51, 22, 10.1007/s11146-014-9477-9

Hopey, 2012

Jensen, 2018, The impact of on-shore and off-shore wind turbine farms on property prices, Energy Policy, 116, 50, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.046

Jones, 2009, Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study, Energy Policy, 37, 4604, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015

Kempton, 2005, The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod, Coast. Manag., 33, 121, 10.1080/08920750590917530

Koundouri, 2009, Valuing a wind farm construction: a contingent valuation study in Greece, Energy Policy, 37, 1939, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.036

Krasny, 2010

Krohn, 1999, On public attitudes towards wind power, Renew. Energy, 16, 954, 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00339-5

Krueger, 2011, Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: an application on the Delaware Shoreline, Land Economics, Vol., 87, 268, 10.3368/le.87.2.268

Ladenburg, 2008, Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy, Renew. Energy, 33, 111, 10.1016/j.renene.2007.01.011

Ladenburg, 2007, Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark, Energy Policy, 35, 4059, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023

Ladenburg, 2009, Preferences of coastal zone user groups regarding the siting of offshore wind farms, Ocean Coast. Manag., 52, 233, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.02.002

Landry, 2012, Wind turbines and coastal recreation demand, Resour. Energy Econ., 34, 93, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.10.001

Lang, 2014, The windy city: property value impacts of wind turbines in an urban setting, Energy Econ., 44, 413, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.05.010

Leiserowitz, 2012, Public support for climate and energy policies in September 2012

Lutzeyer, 2018, The amenity costs of offshore wind farms: evidence from a choice experiment, Energy Econ., 72, 621, 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.020

Lynn, 2011

Mcallister, 2009

Meyerhoff, 2010, Landscape externalities from onshore wind power, Energy Policy, 38, 82, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.055

Mulick, 2007

Pasqualetti, 2001, Wind energy landscapes: society and technology in the California desert, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 14, 689, 10.1080/08941920117490

Patrick County Board of Supervisors, 2006

Preez, 2012, Measuring the indirect costs associated with the establishment of a wind farm: an application of the contingent valuation method, Journal of Energy in South Africa, 21, 2

Redington/Black Nubble Wind, 2012

Schively, 2007, Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research, J. Plan. Lit., 21, 255, 10.1177/0885412206295845

Seffrin, 2013

Sims, 2008, Modeling the impact of wind farms on house prices in the UK, Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag., 12, 251, 10.3846/1648-715X.2008.12.251-269

Strazzera, 2012, Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: a latent class approach, Energy Policy, 48, 334, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.037

Sunak, 2017, The impact of wind farms on property values: a locally weighted hedonic pricing model, Papers in Regional Science, 96, 423, 10.1111/pirs.12197

Swofford, 2010, Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making, Energy Policy, 38, 2508, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046

The White House, 2013

Toke, 2005, Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales, Energy Policy, 33, 1527

U.S. Congress, 2005

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2012

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2012

van der Horst, 2007, NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy controversies, Energy Policy, 35, 2705, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012

Virginia Business, 2010

Warren, 2010, Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland, Land Use Policy, 27, 204, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010

Warren, 2005, ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 48, 853, 10.1080/09640560500294376

Westerberg, 2013, The case for offshore wind farms, artificial reefs and sustainable tourism in the French Mediterranean, Tour. Manag., 34, 172, 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.04.008

Wolsink, 1989, Attitudes and expectancies about wind turbines and wind farms, Wind. Eng., 13, 196

Wolsink, 1994, Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting, Urban Stud., 31, 851, 10.1080/00420989420080711

Wolsink, 2007, Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of “backyard motives”, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 11, 1188, 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005