NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation - Tập 2020 - 2020
Conrad L. Schoch1, Stacy Ciufo1, Michael Domrachev1, Carol L. Hotton1, Sivakumar Kannan1, Rogneda Khovanskaya1, Detlef D. Leipe1, Richard McVeigh1, Kathleen O’Neill1, Barbara Robbertse1, Shobha Sharma1, Vladimir Soussov1, John P. Sullivan1, Lu Sun1, Seán Turner1, Ilene Karsch‐Mizrachi1
1National Center of Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 9600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy includes organism names and classifications for every sequence in the nucleotide and protein sequence databases of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. Since the last review of this resource in 2012, it has undergone several improvements. Most notable is the shift from a single SQL database to a series of linked databases tied to a framework of data called NameBank. This means that relations among data elements can be adjusted in more detail, resulting in expanded annotation of synonyms, the ability to flag names with specific nomenclatural properties, enhanced tracking of publications tied to names and improved annotation of scientific authorities and types. Additionally, practices utilized by NCBI Taxonomy curators specific to major taxonomic groups are described, terms peculiar to NCBI Taxonomy are explained, external resources are acknowledged and updates to tools and other resources are documented.Database URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Karsch-Mizrachi, 2018, The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D48, 10.1093/nar/gkx1097

Strasser, 2008, GenBank—natural history in the 21st century?, Science, 322, 537, 10.1126/science.1163399

Wilkinson, 2016, The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci. Data, 3, 160018, 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Schuler, 1996, Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system, Methods Enzymol., 266, 141, 10.1016/S0076-6879(96)66012-1

Federhen, 2012, The NCBI taxonomy database, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D136, 10.1093/nar/gkr1178

Sharma, 2018, The NCBI BioCollections database, Database, 2018, bay006, 10.1093/database/bay006

Federhen, 2015, Type material in the NCBI taxonomy database, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D1086, 10.1093/nar/gku1127

Federhen, 2016, Meeting report: GenBank microbial genomic taxonomy workshop (12–13 May, 2015), Stand Genomic Sci., 11, 15, 10.1186/s40793-016-0134-1

Sayers, 2019, GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D94, 10.1093/nar/gky989

O’Sullivan, 2017, Bioinformatics: Volume I: Data, Sequence Analysis, and Evolution

O’Leary, 2015, Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D733, 10.1093/nar/gkv1189

Turland, 2018, International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159, 254

Parker, 2019, International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes Prokaryotic Code (2008 revision), Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 69, S7

ICZN, 1999, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature

Walker, 2019, Changes to virus taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2019), Arch. Virol., 164, 2417, 10.1007/s00705-019-04306-w

Guiry, 2020

Frost, 2020

ASM, 2020

Lepage, 2020

DSMZ, 2020, DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures

Fricke, 2020

Beccaloni, 2020

Lefkowitz, 2018, Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D708, 10.1093/nar/gkx932

Kirk, 2020

Thiers, 2020, New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium

ITIS, 2020

Croft, 1999, Plant names for the 21st century: the International Plant Names Index, a distributed data source of general accessibility, Taxon, 48, 317, 10.2307/1224436

Parte, 2018, LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 68, 1825, 10.1099/ijsem.0.002786

Robert, 2013, MycoBank gearing up for new horizons, IMA Fungus, 4, 371, 10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.16

Neave, 1939, Foreword to Nomenclator Zoologicus, Volume 1 (A–C)

PESI, 2020

Uetz, 2020

Tropicos, 2020

Wilson, 2005, Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed), 2142, 10.56021/9780801882210

WCSP, 2020

WFO, 2020

Horton, 2020

Federhen, 2014, Toward richer metadata for microbial sequences: replacing strain-level NCBI taxonomy taxids with BioProject, BioSample and Assembly records, Stand. Genomic Sci., 9, 1275, 10.4056/sigs.4851102

De, Queiroz, 2020, International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature (PhyloCode), 149

Leipe, 1996, Biodiversity, genomes, and DNA sequence databases, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 6, 686, 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80021-9

Page, 2016, DNA barcoding and taxonomy: dark taxa and dark texts, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 371, 20150334, 10.1098/rstb.2015.0334

Mora, 2011, How many species are there on earth and in the ocean?, PLoS Biol., 9, e1001127, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127

Stork, 2018, How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on earth?, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 63, 31, 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348

Larsen, 2017, Inordinate fondness multiplied and redistributed: the number of species on earth and the new pie of life, Q. Rev. Biol., 92, 229, 10.1086/693564

Locey, 2016, Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 113, 5970, 10.1073/pnas.1521291113

Roskov, 2020

Ratnasingham, 2007, BOLD: the barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org), Mol. Ecol. Notes, 7, 355, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x

Hebert, 2003, Biological identifications through DNA barcodes, Proc. R. Soc. B, 270, 313, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

Kissling, 2018, Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale, Biol. Rev., 93, 600, 10.1111/brv.12359

Oren, 2018, Why are so many effectively published names of prokaryotic taxa never validated?, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 68, 2125, 10.1099/ijsem.0.002851

Ciufo, 2018, Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 68, 2386, 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809

NCTC, 2020, The National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC) for bacteria, Public Health England, continuously accessed.

Group, T.A.P, 2016, An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 181, 1, 10.1111/boj.12385

The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group, 2016, A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns, J. Syst. Evol., 6, 563

May, 2019, Chapter F of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants as approved by the 11th International Mycological Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico, July 2018, IMA Fungus, 10, 21, 10.1186/s43008-019-0019-1

Spatafora, 2016, A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data, Mycologia, 108, 1028, 10.3852/16-042

Tedersoo, 2018, High-level classification of the fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses, Fungal Divers., 90, 135, 10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0

Wijayawardene, 2018, Notes for genera: basal clades of fungi (including Aphelidiomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota), Fungal Divers., 92, 43, 10.1007/s13225-018-0409-5

Adl, 2019, Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 66, 4, 10.1111/jeu.12691

Hawksworth, 2011, A new dawn for the naming of fungi: impacts of decisions made in Melbourne in July 2011 on the future publication and regulation of fungal names, Mycokeys, 1, 7, 10.3897/mycokeys.1.2062

Schoch, 2012, Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109, 6241, 10.1073/pnas.1117018109

Bissett, 2015, Accepted Trichoderma names in the year 2015, IMA Fungus, 6, 263, 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.02

Robbertse, 2017, Improving taxonomic accuracy for fungi in public sequence databases: applying ‘one name one species’ in well-defined genera with Trichoderma/Hypocrea as a test case, Database, 2017, bax072, 10.1093/database/bax072

Schoch, 2014, Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for fungi, Database, 2014, bau061, 10.1093/database/bau061

Adl, 2012, The revised classification of eukaryotes, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59, 429, 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x

Burki, 2020, The new tree of eukaryotes, Trends Ecol. Evol., 35, 43, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008

Zhang, 2013, Animal biodiversity: an update of classification and diversity in 2013, Zootaxa, 3703, 5, 10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.3

Marletaz, 2019, A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among gnathiferans, Curr. Biol., 29, 312, 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.042

Philippe, 2019, Mitigating anticipated effects of systematic errors supports sister-group relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria, Curr. Biol., 29, 1818, 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009

Edgecombe, 2011, Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions, Org. Divers. Evol., 11, 151, 10.1007/s13127-011-0044-4

Hejnol, 2009, Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods, Proc. R. Soc. B, 276, 4261, 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896

Cannon, 2016, Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa, Nature, 530, 89, 10.1038/nature16520

Philippe, 2011, Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella, Nature, 470, 255, 10.1038/nature09676

Lu, 2017, The phylogenetic position of dicyemid mesozoans offers insights into spiralian evolution, Zool. Lett., 3, 6, 10.1186/s40851-017-0068-5

Laumer, 2019, Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla, Proc. R. Soc. B, 286, 20190831, 10.1098/rspb.2019.0831

Betancur-R, 2017, Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes, BMC Evol. Biol., 17, 162, 10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3

Ratnasingham, 2013, A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system, Plos One, 8, e66213, 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213

Sayers, 2020, Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Nucleic Acids Res., D1, D9, 10.1093/nar/gkz899

Brister, 2015, NCBI viral genomes resource, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D571, 10.1093/nar/gku1207

Schoch, 2017, Using standard keywords in publications to facilitate updates of new fungal taxonomic names, IMA Fungus, 8, 70, 10.1007/BF03449466

Bidartondo, 2008, Preserving accuracy in GenBank, Science, 319, 1616, 10.1126/science.319.5870.1616a

Garg, 2019, The disconnect between DNA and species names: lessons from reptile species in the NCBI taxonomy database, Zootaxa, 4706, 401, 10.11646/zootaxa.4706.3.1

Wu, 2019, The global catalogue of microorganisms (GCM) 10K type strain sequencing project: providing services to taxonomists for standard genome sequencing and annotation, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 69, 895, 10.1099/ijsem.0.003276

Whitman, 2019, Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (GEBA) VI: learning from type strains, Microbiol. Aust., 40, 125, 10.1071/MA19034

Becker, 2019, Public microbial resource centers: key hubs for findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) microorganisms and genetic materials, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 85, e01444, 10.1128/AEM.01444-19

Godden, 2014, DNA Banking for 21st Century, 173

Droege, 2016, The global genome biodiversity network (GGBN) data standard specification, Database, 2016, baw125, 10.1093/database/baw125

Güntsch, 2017, Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects, Database, 2017, bax003, 10.1093/database/bax003

Boundy-Mills, 2020, Preserving US microbe collections sparks future discoveries, J. Appl. Microbiol., 129, 162, 10.1111/jam.14525

Meiklejohn, 2019, Assessment of BOLD and GenBank—their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials, Plos One, 14, e0217084, 10.1371/journal.pone.0217084

Berney, 2017, UniEuk: time to speak a common language in protistology!, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 64, 407, 10.1111/jeu.12414

Bánki, 2018, Catalogue of life plus: innovating the CoL systems as a foundation for a clearinghouse for names and taxonomy, Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand., 2, e26922

Leray, 2019, GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116, 22651, 10.1073/pnas.1911714116

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Tập 2020

Thông tin tác giả