Muscle-Sparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in a Developing Country

Indian Journal of Surgery - Tập 84 - Trang 745-750 - 2021
Suhani1, Shivpal Saini2, Eshan Verma1, Rajinder Parshad1
1Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
2Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Tóm tắt

Larger breast tumors that are unsuitable for breast conservation surgeries are common in the developing world and are usually treated with mastectomy. This report showcases our experience with the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap for breast reconstruction after wide local excision or partial mastectomy. This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with MSLD flap after wide local excision between February 2016 and June 2018. The study of the aesthetic and functional outcomes was the primary objective and postoperative morbidity (pain, seroma, flap necrosis) as secondary objective. The aesthetic outcome was assessed individually by the patient and doctor as satisfactory, fair, good, and excellent. Donor site appearance was graded as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Disability of the shoulder was assessed subjectively (limitation to perform activities involving overhead abduction at shoulder joint) and objectively by measuring the range of motion at shoulder joint. Ten patients (5 carcinoma, 5 phyllodes) were included. The mean tumor size at time of operation was 4.2 cm for breast cancer patients (assessable in 4 patients) and 6.5 cm (4–9.5 cm) for phyllodes. Skin island of flap had a mean size of 7.5 × 8 cm. Donor site was closed primarily. No donor site seroma was seen. Necrosis of flap margins occurred in one. The aesthetic outcome was good in two and excellent in eight; donor site was rated as satisfactory in all. No patient experienced disability of the shoulder on subjective assessment and objective assessment. MSLD flap offers a satisfactory aesthetic outcome with minimal functional arm compromise or donor site morbidity.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241 Brackley PT, Mishra A, Sigaroudina M, Iqbal A (2010 Sep) Modified muscle sparing latissimus dorsi with implant for total breast reconstruction- extending the boundaries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(9):1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.040 (Epub 2009 Aug 26) Tobin GR, Schusterman M, Peterson GH, Nichols G, Bland KI (1981) The intramuscular neurovascular anatomy of the latissimus dorsi muscle: the basis for splitting the flap. Plast Re- constr Surg 67:637–641 Tobin GR, Moberg AW, DuBou RH, Weiner LJ, Bland KI (1981) The split latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 7:272–280 Schwabegger AH, Harpf C, Rainer C (2003) Muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with maintenance of muscle innervation, function, and aesthetic appearance of the donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1407–1411 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S, Blondeel P (2004) Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept. Br J Plast Surg 57:531–539 Hamdi M, De Frene B (2006) Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 20:73–78 Saint-Cyr M, Nagarkar P, Schaverien M et al (2009) The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:13–24 Jonathan Cook, Jessica Waughtel, Christopher Brooks, Dawn Hardin, RN,Yin Kan Hwee, and Yoav Barnavon (2017) The muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction: a retrospective review of 126 consecutive flaps. Annals of Plastic Surgery.78(Supplement5) Clough KB, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A, et al. (2002) Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1904e11. Yoshihiro Sowa, Toshiaki Numajiri, Katsuhiko Nakatsukasa1, Koichi Sakaguchi, Tetsuya Taguchi. Comparison of morbidity-related seroma formation following conventional latissimus dorsi flap versus muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.3.119 Brumback RJ, McBride MS, Ortolani NC (1992) Functional evaluation of the shoulder after transfer of the vascularised latissimus dorsi muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:377 Stefano Bonomi, Fernanda Settembrini, André Salval, Chiara Gregorelli, Gaetano Musumarra, and Vincenzo Rapisarda. Current indications for and comparative analysis of three different types of latissimus dorsi flaps. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 32(3) 294–302 Russell RC, Pribaz J, Zook EG et al (1986) Functional evaluation of latissimus dorsi donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:336–344 Laitung JK, Peck F (1985) Shoulder function following the loss of the latissimus dorsi muscle. Br J Plast Surg 38:375–379 Fraulin FO, Louie G, Zorrilla L, Tilley W (1995) Functional evaluation of the shoulder following latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Ann Plast Surg 35:349–355