Multiple training interventions significantly improve reproducibility of PET/CT-based lung cancer radiotherapy target volume delineation using an IAEA study protocol

Radiotherapy and Oncology - Tập 121 - Trang 39-45 - 2016
Tom Konert1,2, Wouter V. Vogel1,2, Sarah Everitt3, Michael P. MacManus3, Daniela Thorwarth4, Elena Fidarova5, Diana Paez5, Jan-Jakob Sonke2, Gerard G. Hanna6
1Nuclear Medicine Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
5Department of Nuclear Sciences and Application, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
6Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University of Belfast, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ferlay, 2015, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012, Int J Cancer, 136, 359, 10.1002/ijc.29210 US National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute, 2014 National Cancer Intelligence Network, 2015 Ung, 2011, Positron emission tomography with 18Fluorodeoxyglucose in radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 6, 86, 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181fc7687 Cerfolio, 2004, The accuracy of integrated PET-CT compared with dedicated PET alone for the staging of patients with non small cell lung cancer, Ann Thorac Surg, 78, 1017, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.067 De Wever, 2007, Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT, Eur Radiol, 17, 23, 10.1007/s00330-006-0284-4 Dondi, 2011, Trends in nuclear medicine in developing countries, J Nucl Med, 52, 16, 10.2967/jnumed.111.089193 De Ruysscher, 2005, Effects of radiotherapy planning with a dedicated combined PET-CT-simulator of patients with non-small cell lung cancer on dose limiting normal tissues and radiation dose-escalation: a planning study, Radiother Oncol, 77, 5, 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.014 van Elmpt, 2012, The PET-boost randomised phase II dose-escalation trial in non-small celllung cancer, Radiother Oncol, 104, 67, 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.03.005 Steenbakkers, 2005, Observer variationintargetvolumedelineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a ’Big Brother’ evaluation, Radiother Oncol, 77, 182, 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.017 Rasch, 2009, The influence of a multi-disciplinary meeting for quality assurance on target delineation in radiotherapy treatment preparation international, J Radiat Oncol, 75, 452, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1035 Hanna, 2010, (18)F-FDG PET-CT simulation for non-small-cell lung cancer: effect in patients already staged by PET-CT, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 77, 24, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.045 Caldwell, 2001, Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non small-cell lung tumors on CT: The impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 51, 923, 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01722-9 Greco, 2007, Current status of PET/CT for tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Lung Cancer, 57, 125, 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.03.020 Fox, 2005, Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer?, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 62, 70, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.020 Doll, 2014, Influence of experience and qualification on PET-based target volume delineation. When there is no expert–ask your colleague, Strahlenther Onkol, 190, 555, 10.1007/s00066-014-0644-y Konert, 2015, PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation in curative intent radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: IAEA consensus report 2014, Radiother Oncol, 116, 27, 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.03.014 Zaidi, 2010, PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of imagesegmentationtechniques, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 37, 2165, 10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3 Werner-Wasik, 2012, What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 82, 1164, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.055 Cui H, Wang X, Feng D. Automated localization and segmentation of lung tumor from PET-CT thorax volumes based on image feature analysis. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, San Diego, Calif, USA; 2012. p. 5384–7. Bayne, 2010, Reproducibility of “intelligent” contouring of gross tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 77, 1151, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.032 van Loon, 2012, Microscopicdisease extension in three dimensions for non-small-cell lung cancer: development of a prediction model using pathology-validated positron emission tomography and computed tomography features, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 82, 448, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.001 van Baardwijk, 2007, PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 68, 771, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.067 Van de Steene, 2002, Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: interobserver variability, Radiother Oncol, 62, 37, 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00453-4 Giraud, 2002, Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists, Radiother Oncol, 62, 27, 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00444-3 Kepka, 2007, Delineation variation of lymph node stations for treatment planning in lung cancer radiotherapy, Radiother Oncol, 85, 450, 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.028 Deurloo, 2005, Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 61, 228, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.023 Hanna, 2010, Geometrical analysis of radiotherapy target volume delineation: a systematic review of reported comparison methods, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 22, 515, 10.1016/j.clon.2010.05.006 Rasch, 2010, Decreased3Dobserver variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer, Radiat Oncol, 5, 21, 10.1186/1748-717X-5-21 Vinod, 2016, A review of interventions to reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology, J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 60, 392, 10.1111/1754-9485.12462 Bowden, 2002, Measurementof lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 53, 566, 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02783-9 Schimek-Jasch, 2015, A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies, Strahlenther Onkol, 191, 525, 10.1007/s00066-015-0812-8 Hanna, 2012, Defining target volumes for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of early-stage lung tumours: a comparison of three-dimensional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 24, 71, 10.1016/j.clon.2012.03.002 Spoelstra, 2010, Variations in target volume definition for postoperative radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of an international contouring study. Lung Adjuvant Radiotherapy Trial Investigators Group, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 76, 1106, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.072 Nestle, 2015, Improved inter-observer agreement of an expert review panel in an oncology treatment trial – Insights from a structured interventional process, Eur J Cancer, 51, 2525, 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.036