Multimodal evaluation in academic discussion sessions: How do presenters act and react?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baldry, 2006
Brown, 1987
Carter-Thomas, 2003, Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP). A methodological overview of a multimodal genre, ASp, la revue du GERAS, 39–40, 59, 10.4000/asp.1295
Cassily, 2002, A multi-semiotic genre: The conference slide show, 169
Chafe, 2002, Prosody and emotion in a sample of real speech, 277
Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. (2009). Evaluation in ICT-mediated genres of financial disclosure: A contrastive analysis of spoken earnings presentations vs. written earnings releases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
Dubois, 1980, The use of slides in biomedical speeches, English for Specific Purposes, 1, 45, 10.1016/0272-2380(80)90009-8
Dubois, 1982, And the last slide please: Regulatory function at biomedical meetings, World Language English, 1, 263, 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1981.tb00464.x
Ekman, 1972, Universals and cultural differences between cultures in expressive movement, 207
Goodwin, 1992, Gesture and co-participation in the activity of searching for a word, Semiotica, 62, 51
Hood, 2005, Introducing a conference paper: Getting interpersonal with your audience, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 291, 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.003
Kendon, 1967, Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction, Acta Psychologica, 26, 22, 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4
Kendon, 1990
Kendon, 2004
Kress, 2001
Martin, 2003
Martin, 2005
Mauranen, 2004, Where next? A summary of the round table discussion, 203
Mauranen, 2003, Evaluative language use in academic discourse, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 269, 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00045-6
McClave, 2000, Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech, Journal of Pragmatics, 101, 72
McNeill, 1992
Norris, 2004
O’Keeffe, 2008, Using a corpus to look at variational pragmatics: Response tokens in British and Irish discourse, 68
O’Halloran, 2004
Potter, 1999, Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258, 10.1080/00909889909365539
Poyatos, 2002, vol. II
Querol-Julián, 2011
Räisänen, 1999
Räisänen, 2002, The conference forum: A system of interrelated genres and discursive practices, 69
Räisänen, C., & Fortanet, I. (2006). Do genres have body language? Nonverbal communication in conference paper presentations. Paper presented at conference in honour of John Swales, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, June 2006.
Reidsma, D., op den Akker, R. (2008). Exploring “subjectivity” annotations. In Proceedings of the workshop on human judgments in computational linguistics (pp. 8–16). <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1611628&picked=prox>.
Roope, 1999
Rowley-Jolivet, 2002, Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study, English for Specific Purposes, 21, 19, 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00024-7
Rowley-Jolivet, 2004, Different visions, different visuals: A social semiotic analysis of field-specific visual composition in scientific conference presentations, Visual Communication, 3, 145, 10.1177/147035704043038
Rowley-Jolivet, 2004, Visual textual patterns in scientific conference presentations, 383
Swales, 1990
Thompson, 2008, Systemic functional linguistics: An interpersonal perspective, 107
Varttala, 2002, Hedging in scientific research articles: A cross-disciplinary study, 141
Ventola, 1999, Semiotics spanning at conferences: Cohesion and coherence in an across conference papers and their discussions, 101
Ventola, 2002, Why and what kind of focus in conference presentations?, 15
2002
Webber, 2002, The paper is now open for discussion, 227