Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey

Keller, 2005, A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: A tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 89, 271, 10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.022 1994 Kaplan, 1981, On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Anal, 1, 11, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x 1983 Mosleh, 2014, PRA: A perspective on strengths, current limitations, and possible improvements, Nuclear Eng Technol, 46, 1, 10.5516/NET.03.2014.700 2020, Unlocking reductions in the construction costs of nuclear: A practical guide for stakeholders, No, 7530 2003 1998 2020 Siu, 2013, PSA technology challenges revealed by the Great East Japan Earthquake 2014, 2015 Seong, 2018, Analysis of the technical status of multiunit risk assessment in nuclear power plants, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 319, 10.1016/j.net.2017.12.015 Yang, 2018, Multi-unit risk assessment of nuclear power plants: Current status and issues, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 1199, 10.1016/j.net.2018.09.010 Kim, 2017, Holistic approach to multi-unit site risk assessment: Status and issues, Nuclear Eng Technol, 49, 286, 10.1016/j.net.2017.01.003 Zhou, 2018, A review of multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment research Lowe, 1982, "Indian point probabilistic safety study Lowe, 1983 Fleming, 2013, Application of probabilistic risk assessment to multi-unit sites, Presented to Nat Aca Sci Fukushima Committee 1980 1983, Proposed commission policy statement on severe accidents and related views on nuclear reactor regulation 2011 1971, Amendment to 10 CFR 50 – General design criteria for nuclear power plants, SECY-R, 143 1962, 10 CFR 100 - Reactor site criteria, 27 Fed Reg, 3509 Mays, 1989, Multi-unit IPE and PRA issues Muhlheim, 2007 Brinsfield, 1989, Approach to the evaluation of multi-unit loss of offsite power events, ANS Int Topical Meeting on Probability Reliability and Safety Assess Kim, 2000, Risk analysis of NPP in multi-unit site for configuration of AAC power source Jung, 2003, A new method to evaluate alternate AC power source effects in multi-unit nuclear power plants, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 82, 165, 10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00140-6 Hakata, 2007, Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 92, 883, 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.022 Gagnon, 1997, Annual dose at the exclusion area boundary of a multi-unit CANDU site Fleming, 2005, On the issue of integrated risk–a PRA practitioners perspective Arndt, 2010 Coman, 2018, IAEA project: Multiunit probabilistic safety assessment 2018 Hlavac, 2019, Development of multiunit PSA model for the case study of the IAEA project Krause, 2018, IAEA coordinated research project on probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) benchmark for multi-unit/multi-reactor sites International Atomic Energy Agency International Workshop on the Safety of Multi-Unit Nuclear Power Plant Sites against External Natural Hazards, Mumbai, India, October 17-19, 2012. 2018, Consideration of external hazards in probabilistic safety assessment for single unit and multi-unit nuclear power plants, Safety Reports Series No, 92 2019, Technical approach to probabilistic safety assessment for multiple reactor units, Safety Reports Series No, 96 2019, Small modular reactors regulators' forum: Design and safety analysis working group report on multi-unit/multi-module aspects specific to SMRs, Interim Report Akl, 2019, Insights from a WGRISK activity on the status of site-level PSA developments 2019 Advanced Safety Assessment Methodologies: Extended PSA (ASAMPSA_E) Project: http://asampsa.eu/. Holmberg, 2019 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 2021 2020 2011 2013 2017 Lim, 2018, Development of logical structure for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 1210, 10.1016/j.net.2018.10.012 Oh, 2016, Industry R&D Plans for the site risk management and safety goal in Korea Yalaoui, 2019, Whole-site risk characterization approaches in Canada: Regulatory and technical challenges 2015 Angélique, 2020, Actual status of development of multi-units PSA in France Bareith, 2016, A pilot study on developing a site risk model Utschick, 2019, Methodological approach for a hydrological hazards PSA for a multi-unit multi-source site Henneke, 2019, Simplified methodology for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) modeling 2020 Muhlheim, 2014 Schroer, 2013, An event classification schema for evaluating site risk in a multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 117, 40, 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.005 Nakano, 2018, Multi-unit dependency modeling based on reported Japanese nuclear power plant incidents Cai, 2020, Multiunit nuclear power plant accident scenarios and improvements including those based upon interviews with TEPCO engineers concerning the 2011 Fukushima accidents, Nucl Eng Des, 365, 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110707 Modarres, 2017, Advances in multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 157, 87, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.005 Schroer, 2012 Dennis, 2015, Framework for assessing integrated site risk of small modular reactors using dynamic probabilistic risk assessment simulation Hudson, 2018, Nuclear Regulatory Commission's proposed approach to developing anintegrated site probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model Siu, 2017, PSA R&D: Changing the way we do business, ANS Int Topical Meeting on Probabil Safety Assess Sivori, 2017, Further development of a framework for addressing site integrated risk, ANS Int Topical Meeting on Probabil Safety Assess 2016 Ebisawa, 2012, Current issues on PRA regarding seismic and tsunami events at multi units and sites based on lessons learned from Tohoku earthquake/tsunami, Nuclear Eng Technol, 44, 437, 10.5516/NET.03.2012.704 Lyubarskiy, 2011, Notes on potential areas for enhancement of the PSA methodology based on lessons learned from the Fukushima accident Peters, 2019, Organizational factors in PRA: Twisting knobs and beyond 2016 Arigi, 2019, Human and organizational factors for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment: Identification and characterization for the Korean case, Nuclear Eng Technol, 51, 104, 10.1016/j.net.2018.08.022 Mandelli, 2019, Multi-unit dynamic PRA, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 185, 303, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.029 Cai, 2020, Formulation of a risk assessment framework capable of analyzing nuclear power multiunit accident scenarios, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107040 Yang, 2012, Development of an integrated risk assessment framework for internal/external events and all power modes, Nuclear Eng Technol, 44, 459, 10.5516/NET.03.2012.706 Vecchiarelli, 2014 Hassija, 2014, Probabilistic safety assessment of multi-unit nuclear power plant sites–An integrated approach, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 32, 52, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.07.013 Le Duy, 2016, Probabilistic safety assessment of twin-unit nuclear sites: Methodological elements, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 145, 250, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.014 Zhang, 2016, An integrated modeling approach for event sequence development in multi-unit probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 155, 147, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.008 Kim, 2020, A pragmatic approach to modeling common cause failures in multi-unit PSA for nuclear power plant sites with a large number of units, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 195, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106739 Jang, 2020, A development of methodology for assessing the inter-unit common cause failure in multi-unit PSA model, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107012 Zhou, 2017 Modarres, 2019, A review of selected multi-unit PRA Le Duy, 2018, A practical methodology for modeling and estimation of common cause failure parameters in multi-unit nuclear PSA model, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 170, 159, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.018 Siu, 2016, Advanced knowledge engineering tools to support risk-informed decision making: Final report (public version), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Samaddar, 2014, Technical approach for safety assessment of multi-unit NPP sites subject to external events Basu, 2017, Component fragility for use in PSA of nuclear power plant, Nucl Eng Des, 323, 209, 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.10.018 Zhou, 2018, An improved multi-unit nuclear plant seismic probabilistic risk assessment approach, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 171, 34, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.015 Ebisawa, 2015, Concept and methodology for evaluating core damage frequency considering failure correlation at multi units and sites and its application, Nucl Eng Des, 288, 82, 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.01.002 Zhou, 2017 Segarra, 2020, A Bayesian network approach for modeling dependent seismic failures in a nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Under Rev Segarra, 2020, Extension of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to account for the spatial variability of ground motions at a multi-unit nuclear power plant hard-rock site, Struct Saf, 85 St Germain, 2017 2005 Park, 2019, Treatment of human and organizational factors for multi-unit HRA: Application of SPAR-H method, Ann Nucl Energy, 132, 656, 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.053 Arigi, 2020, Dependency analysis method for human failure events in multi-unit probabilistic safety assessments, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 203, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107112 Cho, 2018, Multi-unit Level 2 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 1217, 10.1016/j.net.2018.04.005 Cooper, 2013, What HRA needs to support site-wide, multi-hazard level 2 PRA Cooper, 2015, How to explain post-core damage operator actions for HRA: Insights from a level 2 HRA/PRA application Arigi, 2019, A human reliability analysis method for level-2 multi-unit PSA challenges and prospective approach Park, 2019, Remaining and emerging issues pertaining to the human reliability analysis of domestic nuclear power plants, Nuclear Eng Technol, 51, 1297, 10.1016/j.net.2019.02.015 2016 2018 Hirt, 2016, Curtiss-Wright/Scientech Seismic HRA insights and lessons learned from the application of EPRI report TR1025294 Kim, 2020, Technical challenges in modeling human and organizational actions under severe accident conditions for Level 2 PSA, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 194, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.003 Kim, 2019 Kim, 2018, Multi-unit Level 3 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 1246, 10.1016/j.net.2018.09.019 Song, 2020, A source term binning methodology for multi-unit consequence analyses, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106989 Bixler, 2020, Performing a multi-unit level-3 PSA with MACCS, Nuclear Eng Technol Hudson, 2019, An approach to developing an integrated site probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model Tina Ghosh, 2019, State-of-the-art reactor consequence analyses project uncertainty analyses: Insights on offsite consequences Ding, 2019, An approach for radiological consequence assessment under unified temporal and spatial coordinates considering multi-reactor accidents, Ann Nucl Energy, 127, 450, 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.12.024 Jung, 2020, Development of MURCC code for the efficient multi-unit level 3 probabilistic safety assessment, Nuclear Eng Technol, 52, 2221, 10.1016/j.net.2020.03.007 Zhang, 2020, Incorporating FLEX strategies in multi-unit probabilistic risk assessment Alsuwaidi, 2020, The risk analysis of the electrical Cross-tie for extended station blackout in multi-unit site, Ann Nucl Energy, 147 Oh, 2020, Study on multi-unit level 3 PSA to understand a characteristic of risk in a multi-unit context, Nuclear Eng Technol, 52, 975, 10.1016/j.net.2019.11.005 Caruso, 2017 Han, 2018, AIMS-MUPSA software package for multi-unit PSA, Nuclear Eng Technol, 50, 1255, 10.1016/j.net.2018.06.012 Oh, 2017, Study on quantification method based on Monte Carlo sampling for multiunit probabilistic safety assessment models, Nuclear Eng Technol, 49, 710, 10.1016/j.net.2016.12.009 Hudson, 2017, Multi-unit accident contributions to quantitative health objectives: A safety goal policy analysis, Nucl Technol, 197, 227, 10.1080/00295450.2016.1273714 Zhou, 2019, Multi-unit risk aggregation with consideration of uncertainty and bias in risk metrics, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 188, 473, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.001