Tối ưu hóa đa phản hồi trong quá trình khí hóa vỏ trái ca cao (Theobroma cacao) và hiệu suất của nó trong động cơ đa nhiên liệu

Kalghatgi G (2018) Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport? Appl energy 225:965–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.076 Deviram G, Mathimani T, Anto S, Ahamed TS, Ananth DA, Pugazhendhi A (2020) Applications of microalgal and cyanobacterial biomass on a way to safe, cleaner and a sustainable environment. J Clean Prod 253:119770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119770 Mathimani T, Baldinelli A, Rajendran K, Prabakar D, Matheswaran M, van Leeuwen RP, Pugazhendhi A (2019) Review on cultivation and thermochemical conversion of microalgae to fuels and chemicals: process evaluation and knowledge gaps. J Clean Prod 208:1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.096 Situmorang YA, Zhao Z, Yoshida A, Abudula A, Guan G (2020) Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (< 200 kW class): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 117:109486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109486 Kumar A, Kumar N, Baredar P, Shukla A (2015) A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:530–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.007 Yadav JP (2017) Performance analysis of producer gas based diesel engine. Int J Engg Innova Res 2013;2(1):42. Murugan PC, Joseph Sekhar S. Numerical simulation of Imbert biomass gasifier to select the feedstock available in remote areas. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36(3):708–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12485. Singh VC, Sekhar SJ (2016) Performance studies on a downdraft biomass gasifier with blends of coconut shell and rubber seed shell as feedstock. Appl Therm Eng 97:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.099 Murugan PC, Sekhar SJ (2017) Species–transport CFD model for the gasification of rice husk (Oryza sativa) using downdraft gasifier. Comput Electron Agric 139:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.004 Murugan PC, Sekhar SJ (2017) Numerical studies to predict the impact of air nozzle position and inclination on the performance of downdraft gratifier. J Appl Fluid Mech 10(3):947–55. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jafm.73.240.26446 Augustine MA, Sekhar SJ (2019) Improvement in the calorific value of producer gas from rice husk with addition of spent tea waste as secondary fuel. Energ Fuel 33(12):12492–12498. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03052 Murugan PC, Sekhar SJ (2021) Investigation on the yield of producer gas from tamarind shell (Tamarindus indica) as feedstock in an Imbert type biomass gasifier. Fuel 292:120310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120310 Malek AA, Hasanuzzaman M, Abd Rahim N (2020) Prospects, progress, challenges and policies for clean power generation from biomass resources. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(6):1229–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01873-4 Prasad GA, Murugan PC, Wincy WB, Sekhar SJ (2021) Response surface methodology to predict the performance and emission characteristics of gas-diesel engine working on producer gases of non-uniform calorific values. Energy 121225.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121225 Situmorang YA, Zhao Z, Yoshida A, Abudula A, Guan G (2020) Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generatio (< 200 kW class): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 117:109486 Singh P, Kumar R, Sharma S, Kumar S (2021) Effect of engine parameters on the performance of dual-fuel CI engines with producer gas—a review. Energy Fuels 35(20):16377–16402. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02279 Sharma M, Kaushal R (2021) Performance and exhaust emission analysis of a variable compression ratio (VCR) dual fuel CI engine fuelled with producer gas generated from pistachio shells. Fuel 283:118924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118924 Singh H, Mohapatra SK (2018) Production of producer gas from sugarcane bagasse and carpentry waste and its sustainable use in a dual fuel CI engine: a performance, emission, and noise investigation. J Energy Inst 91(1):43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.11.002 Sharma M, Kaushal R (2020) Performance and emission analysis of a dual fuel variable compression ratio (VCR) CI engine utilizing producer gas derived from walnut shells. Energy 192:116725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116725 Pandian M, Sivapirakasam SP, Udayakumar M (2011) Investigation on the effect of injection system parameters on performance and emission characteristics of a twin cylinder compression ignition direct injection engine fuelled with pongamia biodiesel–diesel blend using response surface methodology. Appl Energy 88(8):2663–2676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.069 Khoobbakht G, Najafi G, Karimi M, Akram A (2016) Optimization of operating factors and blended levels of diesel, biodiesel and ethanol fuels to minimize exhaust emissions of diesel engine using response surface methodology. Appl Therm Eng 99:1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.143 Sharma P, Sharma AK (2021) Application of response surface methodology for optimization of fuel injection parameters of a dual fuel engine fuelled with producer gas-biodiesel blends. Energy Sources A: Recovery Util Environ Eff 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2021.1892883 Ileri E, Karaoglan AD, Atmanli A (2013) Response surface methodology-based prediction of engine performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel engine fuelled with canola oil methyl ester. J Renew Sustain Energy 5(3):033132. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4811801 Rith M, Biona JB (2021) Development of mathematical models for engine performance and emissions of the producer gas-diesel dual fuel mode using response surface methodology. Eng Appl Sci Res 48(1):18–32. https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2021.3 Saidur R, Jahirul MI, Hasanuzzaman M, Masjuki HH (2008) Analysis of exhaust emissions of natural gas engine by using response surface methodology. J Appl Sci 8(19):3328–3339. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.3328.3339 Atmanlı A, Yüksel B, Ileri E, Karaoglan AD (2015) Response surface methodology based optimization of diesel–n-butanol–cotton oil ternary blend ratios to improve engine performance and exhaust emission characteristics. Energy Convers Manag 90:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.029 Atmanli A, Ileri E, Yilmaz N (2016) Optimization of diesel–butanol–vegetable oil blend ratios based on engine operating parameters. Energy 96:569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.091 Natarajan E, Baskara Sethupathy S (2015) Gasification of groundnut shells. Energ Source Part A 37(9):980–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.601791 Vyas DK, Singh RN (2007) Feasibility study of Jatropha seed husk as an open core gasifier feedstock. Renew energy 32(3):512–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.06.006 Sheth PN, Babu BV (2009) Experimental studies on producer gas generation from wood waste in a downdraft biomass gasifier. Bioresour Technol 100(12):3127–3133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.024 Shrivastava V, Jha AK, Wamankar AK, Murugan S (2013) Performance and emission studies of a CI engine coupled with gasifier running in dual fuel mode. Procedia Eng 51:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.085 Singh RN, Jena U, Patel JB, Sharma AM (2006) Feasibility study of cashew nut shells as an open core gasifier feedstock. Renew energy 31(4):481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.04.010 Nisamaneenate J, Atong D, Sornkade P, Sricharoenchaikul V (2015) Fuel gas production from peanut shell waste using a modular downdraft gasifier with the thermal integrated unit. Renew energy 79:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.046 Sombatwong P, Thaiyasuit P, Pianthong K (2013) Effect of pilot fuel quantity on the performance and emission of a dual producer gas–diesel engine. Energy procedia 34:218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.750 Dahunsi SO, Adesulu-Dahunsi AT, Izebere JO (2019) Cleaner energy through liquefaction of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) pod husk: pretreatment and process optimization. J Clean Prod 226:578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.112 Oddoye EO, Agyente-Badu CK, Gyedu-Akoto E (2013) Cocoa and its by-products: identification and utilization. In Chocolate in health and nutrition 23-37.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-803-0_3 Vriesmann LC, Amboni RD, de Oliveira Petkowicz CL (2011) Cacao pod husks (Theobroma cacao L.): composition and hot-water-soluble pectins. Ind Crops Prod 34(1):1173–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.004 Nayak C, Sahoo BB (2020) Comparative assessment of biogas and producer gas with diesel in a twin cylinder dual-fuel diesel engine. J Braz Soc Mech Sci & Eng 42(10):1–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02615-9 Sandesh K, Shishir RK, Rao CV (2020) Optimization and comparison of induction heating and LPG assisted acid pretreatment of cocoa pod for ABE fermentation. Fuel 262:116499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116499 Gunasekaran AP, Chockalingam MP, Padmavathy SR, Santhappan JS (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation on the thermochemical gasification potential of cocoa pod husk (Theobroma cacoa) in an open-core gasifier. Clean Technol Environ Policy 1-3.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02051-w Basu P (2010) Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Academic press. Patel VR, Upadhyay DS, Patel RN (2014) Gasification of lignite in a fixed bed reactor: influence of particle size on performance of downdraft gasifier. Energy 78:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.017 Awais M, Li W, Munir A, Omar MM, Ajmal M (2021) Experimental investigation of downdraft biomass gasifier fed by sugarcane bagasse and coconut shells. Biomass Convers Biorefin 11(2):429–444 Dhole AE, Yarasu RB, Lata DB, Baraskar SS, Shaw D (2015) Mathematical modeling for the performance and emission parameters of dual-fuel diesel engine using producer gas as secondary fuel. Biomass Convers Bior 5(3):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-014-0142-6 Rith M, Arbon NA, Biona JB (2019) Optimization of diesel injection timing, producer gas flow rate, and engine load for a diesel engine operated on dual fuel mode at a high engine speed. Eng Appl Sci Res 46(3):192–199 Yaliwal VS, Banapurmath NR, Gaitonde VN, Malipatil MD (2019) Simultaneous optimization of multiple operating engine parameters of a biodiesel-producer gas operated compression ignition (CI) engine coupled with hydrogen using response surface methodology. Renew Energy 139:944–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.104 Balakrishnan N, Mayilsamy K (2014) Effect of compression ratio on compression ignition engine performance with biodiesel and producer gas in mixed fuel mode. J Renew Sustain Energy 6(2):023103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868026 Nayak SK, Mishra PC (2017) Emission from a dual fuel operated diesel engine fuelled with Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel and producer gas. Int J Automot Mech Eng 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.14.1.2017.11.0321. Bayat Y, Ghazikhani M (2020) Experimental investigation of compressed natural gas using in an indirect injection diesel engine at different conditions. J Clean Prod 271:122450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122450 Nayak SK, Mishra PC, Noor MM, Hagos FY, Kadirgama K, Mamat R (2019) The performance of turbocharged diesel engine with injected Calophyllum inophyllum methyl ester blends and inducted babul wood gaseous fuels. Fuel 257:116060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116060 Lal S, Mohapatra SK (2017) The effect of compression ratio on the performance and emission characteristics of a dual fuel diesel engine using biomass derived producer gas. Appl Therm Eng 119:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.038 Nayak SK, Nayak B, Mishra PC, Noor MM, Nanda S (2019) Effects of biodiesel blends and producer gas flow on overall performance of a turbocharged direct injection dual-fuel engine. Energ Sources Part A 1-20.https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1694101 Babu MS, Clement S, Rajan NK (2019) Adaptation of air-gas regulator for small capacity producer gas engine. Energy Procedia 156:435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.091 Suresh G, Kamath HC, Banapurmath NR (2014) Effects of injection timing, injector opening pressure and nozzle geometry on the performance of cottonseed oil methyl ester-fuelled diesel engine. Int J Sustain Eng 7(1):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2013.811703 Yaliwal VS, Banapurmath NR, Tewari PG (2014) Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a single-cylinder, four-stroke, direct injection diesel engine operated on a dual-fuel mode using honge oil methyl ester and producer gas derived from biomass feedstock of different origin. Int J Sustain Eng 7(3):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2013.834395 Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Yusaf T, Ardebili SM, Mamat R (2015) Optimization of performance and exhaust emission parameters of a SI (spark ignition) engine with gasoline–ethanol blended fuels using response surface methodology. Energy 90:1815–1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.004 Kashyap D, Das S, Kalita P (2021) Exploring the efficiency and pollutant emission of a dual fuel CI engine using biodiesel and producer gas: an optimization approach using response surface methodology. Sci Total Environ 773:145633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145633 Kamaraj RK, Gowthami Thankachi Raghuvaran J, Panimayam AF, Allasi HL (2018) Performance and exhaust emission optimization of a dual fuel engine by response surface methodology. Energies 11(12):3508. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123508 Simsek S, Uslu S (2020) Determination of a diesel engine operating parameters powered with canola, safflower and waste vegetable oil based biodiesel combination using response surface methodology (RSM). Fuel 270:117496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117496 Halewadimath SS, Banapurmath NR, Yaliwal VS, Nataraja KM (2019) Effect of engine variables on combustion characteristics of a dual fuel engine powered by neem oil methyl ester and producer gas. Int J Ambient Energy 1-3.https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1696889 Guo H, Liko B, Luque L, Littlejohns J (2018) Combustion performance and unburned hydrocarbon emissions of a natural gas–diesel dual fuel engine at a low load condition. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 140(11). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039758. Yoon SH, Lee CS (2011) Experimental investigation on the combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of biogas–biodiesel dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine. Fuel Process Technol 92(5):992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.021 Ambarita H (2017) Performance and emission characteristics of a small diesel engine run in dual-fuel (diesel-biogas) mode. Case Stud Therm Eng 10:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2017.06.003 Homdoung N, Tippayawong N, Dussadee N (2015) Performance and emissions of a modified small engine operated on producer gas. Energy Convers Manag 94:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.078 Singh J, Singh S, Mohapatra SK (2020) Production of syngas from agricultural residue as a renewable fuel and its sustainable use in dual-fuel compression ignition engine to investigate performance, emission, and noise characteristics. Energ Source Part A 42(1):41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1587053 Hernández JJ, Lapuerta M, Barba J (2015) Effect of partial replacement of diesel or biodiesel with gas from biomass gasification in a diesel engine. Energy 89:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.050 Banapurmath NR, Tewari PG (2009) Comparative performance studies of a 4-stroke CI engine operated on dual fuel mode with producer gas and honge oil and its methyl ester (HOME) with and without carburetor. Renew Energy 34(4):1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.08.005 Yaliwal VS, Banapurmath NR, Gireesh NM, Hosmath RS, Donateo T, Tewari PG (2016) Effect of nozzle and combustion chamber geometry on the performance of a diesel engine operated on dual fuel mode using renewable fuels. Renew Energy 93:483–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.020 Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C (2008) Dual fuel mode operation in diesel engines using renewable fuels: rubber seed oil and coir-pith producer gas. Renew Energy 33(9):2077–2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.11.013 Benson RS, Ledger JD, Whitehouse ND, Walmsley S (1973) Comparison of experimental and simulated transient responses of a turbocharged diesel engine. SAE Transactions 2424–47.