Multi-player electoral engineering and COVID-19 in the polish presidential elections in 2020

Mind & Society - Tập 21 - Trang 1-8 - 2022
Jarosław Flis1, Marek Kaminski2
1The Jagiellonian Center for Quantitative Research in Political Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
2Department of Political Science and Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA

Tóm tắt

The uniqueness of Poland’s experience with the 2020 coronavirus lays in the interplay of two factors: the decisive governmental response to the pandemic, and the overlap of the pandemic with the country’s presidential election scheduled on May 10, 2020. The government’s fast reaction, combined with the citizens’ discipline, resulted in the suppression of the virus’s spread. The ratings of the current President Duda skyrocketed well above 50% needed for re-election in the first round. However, the expectation was that they would be going down with the pandemic and lockdown fatigue. For almost two months, the government tried to organize the elections under the normal schedule while the opposition tried to block them. Finally, the opposition won, and the elections were rescheduled on June 28, with the President Duda’s ratings substantially lower. Nevertheless, in the runoff on July 11, Duda won. Our conclusion goes against the common opinion that electoral engineering is always one-sided. The reconstruction of the pre-electoral political maneuvers shows that many independent players were simultaneously involved in complex engineering, and that the final outcome was hard to predict until almost the very end.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Apple Mobility Trends (2020) https://www.apple.com/covid19/mobility. Accessed 21 May 2020 Bujnicki P, Krajewski A (2020) EU’s Most Virus-Shielded Member Seen Headed for U-Shaped Rebound https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-11/eu-s-most-virus-shielded-member-seen-headed-for-u-shaped-rebound. Accessed 14 May 2020 CIA World Factbook (2020) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 11 May 2020 Ibris (2020) (Instytut Badań Rynkowych i Społecznych) http://twitter.com/IBRIS_PL. Accessed 11 May 2020 Flis J, Ciszewski W (2020) Nieudane samobójstwo polityczne – ustawa o powszechnym głosowaniu korespondencyjnym w wyborach prezydenckich 2020, Studia Socjologiczno-Polityczne. Seria Nowa 1(12):99–120 Flis J, Marcinkiewicz K (2020) Głosowanie korespondencyjne – wzory i ostrzeżenia z Bawarii. Fundacja Batorego Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (2020) https://coronavirus.jhu.edu. Accessed 14 May 2020 Kaminski MM (2002) Do parties benefit from electoral manipulation? Electoral laws and heresthetics in Poland, 1989-93. J Theoretical Politics 14(3):325–358 Rakowska-Trela A (2020) Wybory prezydenckie 2020. Kontekst prawny, Fundacja Batorego Rychard A, Haman J (2020) Wybory prezydenckie 2020. Kontekst społeczny i polityczny. Fundacja Batorego United Surveys (2020) 03/16/2020. https://twitter.com/united_surveys. Accessed 11 May 2020 WHO (2020) Situation reports. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports. Accessed 11 May 2020