Multi-peril risk assessment for business downtime of industrial facilities

Saurabh Prabhu1, Mohammad Javanbarg1, Marc Lehmann2, Sez Atamturktur3
1American International Group, New York, USA
2Catastrophe Management Solutions, Americal International Group, London, UK
3Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abe K (1995) Estimate of tsunami run-up heights from earthquake magnitudes. In: Tsunami: progress in prediction, disaster prevention and warning, Springer, pp 21–35

Abrahamson N, Silva W, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1025–1055

Abrahamson N, Gregor N, Addo K (2016) BC hydro ground motion prediction equations for subduction earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 32(1):23–44

Akkar S, Cagnan Z (2010) Local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey, and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(6):2978–2995

Akkar S, Sandikkaya MA, Bommer JJ (2014) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended- source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 12(1):359–387

ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. American Lifelines Alliance

Alipour A, Shafei B, Shinozuka M (2010) Performance evaluation of deteriorating highway bridges located in high seismic areas. J Bridge Eng 16(5):597–611

Alipour A, Shafei B, Shinozuka M (2012) Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: scour and earthquake. J Bridge Eng 18(5):362–371

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2011) Modifications to existing ground-motion prediciton equations in light of new data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(3):1121–1135

Barrientos S, Verab E, Alvaradoc P, Monfret T (2004) Crustal seismicity in Central Chile. J S Am Earth Sci 16:759–768

Basco A, Salzano E (2016) The vulnerability of industrial equipment to tsunami. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 50:301–307

Bindi D, Massa M, Luzi L, Ameri G, Pacor F, Puglia R, Augliera P (2014) Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset. Bull Earthq Eng 12(1):391–430

Boggess JM, Becker GW, Mitchell MK (2014) Storm and flood hardening of electrical substations. In: T&D conference and exposition, IEEE, pp 1–5

Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson G (2014): NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5 % damped PGA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1057–1085

Boudali H, Dugan JB (2005) A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87(3):337–349

Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5 % damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1087–1115

Cauzzi C, Faccioli E, Vanini M, Bianchini A (2014) Updated predictive equations for broadband (0.01–10 s) horizontal response spectra and peak ground motions, based on a global dataset of digital acceleration records. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1587–1612

Chandler AM, Jones EJW, Patel MH (2001) Property loss estimation for wind and earthquake perils. Risk Anal 21(2):235–250

Chiou BS-J, Youngs R (2014) Updated of the chiou and youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1117–1153

Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2009) Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct Saf 31(4):275–283

Comer RP (1980) Tsunami height and earthquake magnitude: theoretical basis of an empirical relation. Geophys Res Lett 7(6):445–448

Cornell C (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606

Doguc O, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2009) A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):542–550

Dong Y, Frangopol DM, Saydam D (2013) Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 42(10):1451–1467

Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61(1):43–104

Drouet S (2016) A stochastic GMPE for Brazil, unpublished manuscript

Drouet S, Montalva G, Dimate M, Castillo L, Fernandez G, Morales C, Bastias N, Pirchiner M, Singaucho J, Weathermill G (2017) Building a ground motion logic tree for South America within the GEM-SARA project framework. In: 16th world conference on earthquake engineering January 9–13, Santiago, Chile

EPRI (2013) Seismic probabilistic risk assessment implementation guide. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

Faccioli E, Bianchini A, Villani M (2010) New ground motion prediction equations for T>1 s and their influence on seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the university of Tokyo symposium on long-period ground motion and urban disaster mitigation, Tokyo, Japan

Field E, Jordan T, Cornell C (2003) OpenSHA—developing community modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Sesimol Res Lett 74:406–419

Francis M (2006) Tsunami inundation scour of roadways, bridges and fundations—observations and technical guidance from the Great Sumatra Andaman Tsunami. EERI

Gehl P, D’Ayala D (2016) Development of Bayesian networks for the multi-hazard fragility assessment of bridge systems. Struct Saf 60:37–46

Geist EL (2012) Phenomenology of tsunamis II: scaling, event statistics, and inter-event triggering. Adv Geophy 53:35–92

Geist EL, Parsons T (2016) Reconstruction of far-field tsunami amplitude distributions from earthquake sources. Pure appl Geophys 173(12):3703–3717

GEM (2017) SARA wiki. Global earthquake model, 15 11 2016. https://sara.openquake.org/start . Accessed 03 Aug 2017

GEM (2017) Research topic 6 (RT6): A South American strong motion database and selection of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for seismic hazard analysis in South America. Global Earthq Model, 12 8 2016. https://sara.openquake.org/hazard_rt6 . Accessed 5 Sep 2017

Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2010) Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J Struct Eng 136(12):1497–1511

Gill JC, Malamud BD (2014) Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Rev Geophys 52(4):680–772

Grünthal G, Thieken AH, Schwarz J, Radtke KS, Smolka A, Merz B (2006) Comparative risk assessments for the city of Cologne–storms, floods, earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):21–44

Haraguchi M, Kim S (2014) Critical infrastructure systems: a case-study of the interconnectedness of risks posed by Hurrican Sandy for New York City, UNISDR

Hatayama K (2014) Damage to oil storage tanks due to tsunami of the Mw9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohuku, Japan. In: Proceedings of tenth US national conference on earthquake engineering frontiers of earthquake engineering, pp 21–25

Haugen KB, Løvholt F, Harbitz CB (2005) Fundamental mechanisms for tsunami generation by submarine mass flows in idealised geometries. Mar Pet Geol 22(1):209–217

Horspool NA, Fraser S (2016) An analysis of tsunami impacts to lifelines, GNS Science Consultancy Report 2016/22. Available at https://www.eqc.govt.nz/sites/public_files/1605-Analysis-of-tsuami-impacts-to-lifelines.pdf . Accessed 8 May 2019

Iida K (1983) Some remarks on the occurence of Tsunamigenic earthquakes around the Pacific. In: Iida K, Iwasaki T (eds) Tsunamis-their science and engineering. Terra Scientific Publication Company, Tokyo, pp 61–76

Javanbarg M, Scawthorn C, Kiyono J, Ono Y (2009) Multi-hazard reliability analysis of lifeline networks. In: Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering conference (TCLEE) June 28–July 1, 2009, Oakland, California, United States, ASCE, pp 1–8

Johnson G, Sheppard R, Quilici M, Eder S, Scawthorne C (1999) Seismic reliability assessment of critical facilities: a handbook, supporting documentation, and model code provisions. MCEER, New York

Kameshwar S, Padgett JE (2014) Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards. Eng Struct 78(1):154–166

Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64(2):1925–1958

Kazama M, Noda T (2012) Damage statistics (summary of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake damage). Soils Found 52(5):780–792

Koshimura S, Oie T, Yanagisawa H, Imamura F (2009) Developing fragility functions for tsunami damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Coast Eng J 5(103):243–273

Krausmann E, Cruz AM (2013) Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry. Nat Hazards 67(2):811–828

Krawcyzk C (2003) Amphibious seismic survey images plate interface at 1960 Chile earthquake. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 84(32):301–305

Kulikov E, Rabinovich A, Thomson R (2005) Estimation of tsunami risk for the coasts of Peru and northern Chile. Nat Hazards 35(2):185–209

Kunz M, Mühr B, Kunz-Plapp T, Daniell JE, Khazai B, Wenzel F, Vannieuwenhuyse M, Comes T, Elmer F, Schroter K, Fohringer J, Munzberg TLC, Zschau J (2013) Investigation of superstorm Sandy 2012 in a multi-disciplinary approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss 1:625–679

Landucci G, Necci A, Antonioni G, Tugnoli A, Cozzani V (2014) Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 132:125–145

Li Y, Ellingwood B (2009) Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction. J Struct Eng 135(2):159–168

Li Y, Song R, Van De Lindt JW (2014) Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences. J Struct Eng 140(2):04014095

Macabuag J, Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Suppasri A, Sugawara D, Adriano B, Imamura F, Eames I, Koshimura S (2016) A proposed methodology for deriving tsunami fragility functions for buildings using optimum intensity measures. Nat Hazards 84(2):1257–1285

Mackie K, B Stojadinovic (2004) Residual displacement and post-earthquake capacity of highway bridges. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

Malhotra PK, Wenk T, Wieland M (2000) Simple procedure for seismic analysis of liquid-storage tanks. Struct Eng Int 10(3):197–201

Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A (2012) Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy. Nat Hazards 62(2):551–573

Mignan A, Wiemer S, Giardini D (2014) The quantification of low-probability—high-consequences events: part I. A generic multi-risk approach. Nat Hazards 73(3):1999–2022

Montalva GA, Bastías N, Rodriguez-Marek A (2016) Ground motion prediction equation for the Chilean subduction zone. Seismol Res Lett (Submitted)

Murty TS (1977) Seismic sea waves tsunamis. Bull Fish Res Board Canada 198:337

Nishi H (2012) Damage on hazardous materials facilities. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill GA, Garcia J (2014) The OpenQuake-engine book: hazard technical report 2014–08. Global Earthquake Model (GEM)

Park J, Cho J, Rose A (2011) Modeling a major source of economic resilience to disasters: recapturing lost production. Nat Hazards 58(1):163–182

Petersen M, Harmsen S, Haller K, Mueller C, Luco N, Hayes G, Dewey J, Rukstales K (2010) Preliminary seismic hazard model for South America. In: Conferencia Internacional en Homenaje a Alberto Giesecke Matto, Peru

Prasad G, Banerjee S (2013) The impact of flood-induced scour on seismic fragility characteristics of bridges. J Earthquake Eng 17(6):803–828

Rose A, Huyck CK (2016) Improving catastrophe modeling for business interruption insurance needs. Risk Anal 36(10):1896–1915

Ryu H, Luco N, Uma SR, Liel AB (2011) Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis. In: Ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand

Silgado E (1978) Recurrence of tsunamis in the western coast of South America. Mar Geodesy 1(4):347–354

Silva W, Gregor N, Darragh R (2002) Development of regional hard rock attenuation relations for central and eastern North America. Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, CA. Available at http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0423/ML042310569

Somoza R, Ghidella M (2005) Convergencia en el margen occidental de Ame´rica del Sur durante el Cenozoico: subduccio´n de las placas de Nazca Farallón y Aluk. Revista de la Asociacio´n Geolo´gica Argentina 60:797–809

Stewart J, Douglas J, Javanbarg M, Di Alessandro C, Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson N, Boore D, Campbell K, Delavaud E, Erdik M, Stafford P (2013) GEM-PEER task 3 project: selection of a global set of ground motion prediction equations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

Suppasri A, Fukutani Y, Abe Y, Imamura F (2013) Relationship between earthquake magnitude and tsunami height along the Tohoku coast based on historical tsunami trace database and the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami. Rep Tsunami Eng 30:37–49

Suzuki K (2008) Earthquake damage to industrial facilities and development of seismic and vibration control technology. J Syst Des Dyn 2(1):2–11

SwissRe (2013) Mind the risk: a global ranking of cities under threat from natural disasters. Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Zurich

Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(6):2283–2296

Tinti S, Armigliato A, Pagnoni G, Zaniboni F (2005) Scenarios of giant tsunamis of tectonic origin in the Mediterranean. ISET J Earthq Technol 42(4):171–188

USDOE (2013) Comparing the impacts of northeast Hurricanes on energy infrastructure. US Department of Energy, Washington DC

Wang Z, Song W, Li T (2012) Combined fragility surface analysis of earthquake and scour hazards for bridge. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 24–28

Yamashita T, Sato R (1974) Generation of tsunami by a fault model. J Phys Earth 22(4):415–440

Youngs RR, Chiou BS.-J, Silva JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73

Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898–913