Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a suitable biomass material for maximum bio-oil yield during pyrolysis

Fuel - Tập 277 - Trang 118109 - 2020
P. Madhu1, C. Sowmya Dhanalakshmi1, Manoj Mathew2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, SNS College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641035, India
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492015, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Balat, 2005, Usage of energy sources and environmental problems, Energy Explor Exploit, 23, 141, 10.1260/0144598054530011

Yaman, 2004, Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks, Energy Convers Manage, 45, 651, 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00177-8

Demirbas, 2004, Bioenergy, global warming, and environmental impacts, Energy Sources, 26, 225, 10.1080/00908310490256581

Yang, 2007, Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis, Fuel, 86, 1781, 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013

Tsai, 2007, Fast pyrolysis of rice husk: Product yields and compositions, Bioresour Technol, 98, 22, 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.005

Madhu, 2018, Flash pyrolysis of lemon grass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) for bio-oil production in an electrically heated fluidized bed reactor, Waste Biomass Valorization, 9, 1037, 10.1007/s12649-017-9872-6

Bridgwater, 2012, Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading, Biomass Bioenergy, 38, 68, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048

Collard, 2014, A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: Mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 38, 594, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.013

Vamvuka, 2011, Bio-oil, solid and gaseous biofuels from biomass pyrolysis processes—an overview, Int J Energy Res, 35, 835, 10.1002/er.1804

Lange, 2007, Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics, Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining Innov Sustainable Econ, 1, 39, 10.1002/bbb.7

White, 2011, Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 91, 1, 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.004

Fisher, 2002, Pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of biomass derived materials, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 62, 331, 10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00129-2

Dhanalakshmi, 2019, Recycling of wood bark of Azadirachta indica for bio-oil and chemicals by flash pyrolysis, Indian Journal of Ecology, 46, 347

Ding, 2020, Thermal interaction analysis of isolated hemicellulose and cellulose by kinetic parameters during biomass pyrolysis, Energy, 195, 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117010

Yeo, 2019, Comparative studies on the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin based on combined kinetics, J Energy Inst, 92, 27, 10.1016/j.joei.2017.12.003

Wang, 2011, Influence of the interaction of components on the pyrolysis behavior of biomass, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 91, 183, 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.02.006

Hosoya, 2007, Cellulose–hemicellulose and cellulose–lignin interactions in wood pyrolysis at gasification temperature, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 80, 118, 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.01.006

Stefanidis, 2014, A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 105, 143, 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.10.013

Williams, 1993, 771

Jahirul, 2012, Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis—a technological review, Energies, 5, 4952, 10.3390/en5124952

Madhu, 2018, Conversion of cotton residues to bio-oil and chemicals through flash pyrolysis in a fluidised bed reactor, Int J Energy Technol Policy, 14, 20, 10.1504/IJETP.2018.088275

Madhu, 2015, Production and upgradation of cotton shell pyrolytic oil for biofuel from flash pyrolysis by fluidized bed reactor, Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect A, 85, 457, 10.1007/s40010-015-0220-6

Gray, 1985, Pyrolysis of a wood-derived material. Effects of moisture and ash content, Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev, 24, 646, 10.1021/i200030a020

Mathew, 2019, Interval valued multi criteria decision making methods for the selection of flexible manufacturing system, Int J Data Network Sci, 3, 349, 10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.4.001

Mathew, 2018, Comparison of new multi-criteria decision making methods for material handling equipment selection, Manage Sci Lett, 8, 139, 10.5267/j.msl.2018.1.004

Madhu, 2018, Selection of biomass materials for bio-oil yield: a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach, Clean Technol Environ Policy, 20, 1377, 10.1007/s10098-018-1545-z

Shanian, 2006, TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell, J Power Sources, 159, 1095, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.092

Ilangkumaran, 2012, Application of hybrid VIKOR model in selection of maintenance strategy, Int J Inform Syst Supply Chain Manage (IJISSCM), 5, 59, 10.4018/jisscm.2012040104

Rao, 2007

Ertuğrul, 2009, Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods, Expert Syst Appl, 36, 702, 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014

Wang, 2006, Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Syst Appl, 31, 309, 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040

Wang, 2007, Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment, Expert Syst Appl, 33, 870, 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003

Opricovic, 1998, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty Civil Eng Belgrade, 2, 5

Bahraminasab, 2011, Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR, Mater Des, 32, 4471, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.046

Jahan, 2013, VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria, Mater Des, 47, 759, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.072

Anojkumar, 2014, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry, Expert Syst Appl, 41, 2964, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028

Chakraborty, 2013, Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data, Decision Sci Lett, 2, 135, 10.5267/j.dsl.2013.03.005

Luthra, 2017, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, J Cleaner Prod, 140, 1686, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078

Rao, 2002, Failure cause analysis of machine tools using digraph and matrix methods, Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 42, 521, 10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00135-3

Sehgal, 2000, Reliability evaluation and selection of rolling element bearings, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 68, 39, 10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00081-2

Rao, 2006, Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods, Rob Comput Integr Manuf, 22, 373, 10.1016/j.rcim.2005.08.003

Yu, 2005, A graph-based proactive fault identification approach in computer networks, Comput Commun, 28, 366, 10.1016/j.comcom.2004.07.008

Grover, 2004, A digraph approach to TQM evaluation of an industry, Int J Product Res, 42, 4031, 10.1080/00207540410001704032

Faisal, 2007, Quantification of risk mitigation environment of supply chains using graph theory and matrix methods, Eur J Indust Eng, 1, 22, 10.1504/EJIE.2007.012652

Hiloidhari, 2014, Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 32, 504, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.025

Jin, 2017, Determination of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin content using visible and near infrared spectroscopy in Miscanthus sinensis, Bioresour Technol, 241, 603, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.047

Julong, 1989, Introduction to grey system theory, The Journal of grey system, 1, 1

Durairaj, 2016, Selection of alternate fuel for electrical power generator using hybrid multi criteria decision making technique, Univ Politehn Bucharest Sci Bull Series C-Electr Eng Comput Sci, 78, 247

Hwang, 1981, 58

Kuo, 2011, Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment, Expert Syst Appl, 38, 1304, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.003

San Cristóbal, 2011, Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method, Renewable Energy, 36, 498, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2015, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26, 435, 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57

Brans, 1985, Note—A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making), Manage Sci, 31, 647, 10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647

D'avignon, G. and B. Mareschal, Specialization of hospital services in Québec: an application of the PROMETHEE and GAIA methods, in Models and Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. 1989, Elsevier. p. 1393-1400.

Abdullah, 2019, Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions, J Indust Eng Int, 15, 271, 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z

Pirdashti, 2009, Selection of the best module design for ultrafiltration (UF) membrane in dairy industry: an application of AHP and PROMETHEE, Int J Eng (IJE), 3, 426

Athawale, 2011, A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection, Int J Indust Eng Comput, 2, 831

Sowmya Dhanalakshmi, 2019, Biofuel production of neem wood bark (Azadirachta indica) through flash pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor and its chromatographic characterization, Energy Sources Part A, 1, 10.1080/15567036.2019.1624893

Sowmya Dhanalakshmi, 2019, Utilization possibilities of Albizia amara as a source of biomass energy for bio-oil in pyrolysis process, Energy Sources Part A, 41, 1908, 10.1080/15567036.2018.1549168

Küçükbayrak, 1989, Effect of pyrolysis on the proximate and ultimate analysis of lignite, Thermochim Acta, 155, 1, 10.1016/0040-6031(89)87131-X

Yildiz, G., F. Ronsse, and W. Prins. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass: from lab-scale research to industrial applications. in 4th International conference on Thermochemical Conversion Science (TcBiomass 2015). 2015.

Mathew, 2020, Selection of an optimal maintenance strategy under uncertain conditions: an interval type-2 fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method, IEEE Trans Eng Manage, 1, 10.1109/TEM.2020.2977141