Motor Reaction Times as an Embedded Measure of Performance Validity: a Study with a Sample of Austrian Early Retirement Claimants
Tóm tắt
Among embedded measures of performance validity, reaction time parameters appear to be less common. However, their potential may be underestimated. In the German-speaking countries, reaction time is often examined using the Alertness subtest of the Test of Attention Performance (TAP). Several previous studies have examined its suitability for validity assessment. The current study was conceived to examine a variety of reaction time parameters of the TAP Alertness subtest with a sample of 266 Austrian civil forensic patients. Classification results from the Word Memory Test (WMT) were used as an external indicator to distinguish between valid and invalid symptom presentations. Results demonstrated that the WMT fail group performed worse in reaction time as well as its intraindividual variation across trials when compared to the WMT pass group. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed areas under the curve of .775–.804. Logistic regression models indicated the parameter intraindividual variation of motor reaction time with warning sound as being the best predictor for invalid test performance. Suggested cut scores yielded a sensitivity of .62 and a specificity of .90, or .45 and .95, respectively, when the accepted false-positive rate was set lower. The results encourage the use of the Alertness subtest as an embedded measure of performance validity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., Enache, A., Dhuga, J., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test-Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition. The Psychological Corporation.
Bodenburg, S. (2014). Die Standardabweichung der Reaktionszeiten als ein Maß für negative Antwortverzerrungen [Standard deviation of simple reaction time as an indication of negative response bias]. Zeitschrift Für Neuropsychologie, 25(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/a000123
Boone, K., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. (2002). The b test. Western Psychological Service.
Brennan, A. M., Meyer, S., David, E., Pella, R., Hill, B. D., & Gouvier, W. D. (2009). The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(2), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802054151
Brockhaus, R., & Merten, T. (2004). Neuropsychologische Diagnostik suboptimalen Leistungsverhaltens mit dem Word Memory Test [Neuropsychological assessment of suboptimal performance: The Word Memory Test]. Der Nervenarzt, 75(9), 882–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1592-4
Cerny, B. M., Rhoads, T., Leib, S. I., Jennette, K. J., Basurto, K. S., Basurto, K. S., Durkin, N. M., Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., & Soble, J. R. (2021). Mean response latency indices on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test do not contribute meaningful predictive value over accuracy scores for detecting invalid performance. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1872575
Cima, M., Hollnack, S., Kremer, K., Knauer, E., Schellbach-Matties, R., Klein, B., & Merckelbach, H. (2003). “Strukturierter Fragebogen Simulierter Symptome”. Die deutsche Version des “Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: SIMS” [The German version of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology]. Der Nervenarzt, 74(11), 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-002-1438-5
Conners, C. K., & Staff, M. (2004). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II (CPT II V. 5). Multi-Health Systems.
Czornik, M., Merten, T., & Lehrner, J. (2021). Symptom and performance validation in patients with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1628761
Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act073
Eglit, G. M. L., Jurick, S. M., Delis, D. C., Filoteo, J. V., Bondi, M. W., & Jak, A. J. (2020). Utility of the D-KEFS Color Word Interference Test as an embedded measure of performance validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1643923
Erdodi, L. A., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2017). Invalid before impaired: An emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1323119
Erdodi, L. A., Roth, R. M., Kirsch, N. L., Lajiness-O’Neill, R., & Medoff, B. (2014). Aggregating validity indicators embedded in Conners’ CPT-II outperforms individual cutoffs at separating valid from invalid performance in adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(5), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu026
Fiene, M., Bittner, V., Fischer, J., Schwiecker, K., Heinze, H. J., & Zaehle, T. (2015). Untersuchung der Simulationssensibilität des Alertness-Tests der Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) [Detecting simulation of attention deficits using the Alertness test of the Test of Attentional Performance (TAP)]. Zeitschrift Für Neuropsychologie, 26(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/a000125
Fuermaier, A. B. M., Tucha, L., Koerts, J., Aschenbrenner, S., & Tucha, O. (2017). Vienna Test System (VTS): The Groningen Effort Test (GET). Schuhfried.
Green, P. (2003). Green’s Word Memory Test. User’s manual. Green’s Publishing.
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802232690
Grossi, L. M., Green, D., Einzig, S., & Belfi, B. (2017). Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000364
Groth-Marnat, G. (1990). The handbook of psychological assessment (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Harrison, A. G., & Armstrong, I. T. (2020). Differences in performance on the Test of Variables of Attention between credible vs. noncredible individuals being screened for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 9(4), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2020.1750115
Hartman, D. E. (2002). The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing. Neuropsychological malingering and the Word Memory Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00172-X
Hautzinger, M., Keller, F., Kühner, C., & Bürger, C. (2006). Das Beck-Depressions-Inventar II (BDI-II) [The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)]. Harcourt Test Services.
Ingram, P. B., Golden, B. L., & Armistead-Jehle, P. J. (2020). Evaluating the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting scales in a military neuropsychology clinic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1708271
Jansen, M. T., Tamm, S., Merten, T., Tamm, A., & Hofmann, M. J. (2020). Feigning memory impairment in a forced-choice task: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Neurophysiology, 158, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.10.003
Kaminski, A., Merten, T., & Kobelt-Pönicke, A. (2020). Der Vergleich von drei Beschwerdenvalidierungstests in der stationären psychosomatischen Rehabilitation [Comparison of three symptom validity tests in a sample of psychosomatic inpatients]. Zeitschrift Für Psychiatrie, Psychologie Und Psychotherapie, 68(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747/a000408
Kanser, R. J., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., & Hanks, R. A. (2019). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury: Combining response time with performance validity test accuracy. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1440006
Köllner, V., & Schauenburg, H. (2012). Psychotherapie im Dialog - Diagnostik und Evaluation [Psychotherapy in dialogue: Diagnosis and evaluation]. Thieme.
LaDuke, C., Barr, W., Brodale, D. L., & Rabin, L. A. (2018). Toward generally accepted forensic assessment practices among clinical neuropsychologists: A survey of professional practice and common test use. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1346711
Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Meyers, J. E. (2008). Sensitivity to brain dysfunction of the Halstead-Reitan vs an ability-focused neuropsychological battery. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(5), 813–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701625846
Leark, R. A., Greenberg, L. M., Kindschi, C. L., Dupuy, T. R., & Hughes, S. J. (2008). T.O. V.A. professional manual. Test of Variables of Attention continuious performance test. T.O.V.A. Company.
Lukács, G., Kawai, C., Ansorge, U., & Fekete, A. (2021). Detecting concealed language knowledge via response times. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0130
Lupu, T., Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2018). Enhanced Detection of Feigned Cognitive Impairment Using per Item Response Time Measurements in the Word Memory Test: Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25(6), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1341410
Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2020). Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa017
Merten, T., Giger, P., Merckelbach, H., & Stevens, A. (2019). Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) – deutsche Version [German version of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory]. Hogrefe.
Merten, T., Kaminski, A., & Pfeiffer, W. (2020). Prevalence of overreporting on symptom validity tests in a large sample of psychosomatic rehabilitation inpatients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(5), 1004–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1694073
Merten, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2020). Factitious disorder and malingering. In J. R. Geddes, N. C. Andreasen, & G. M. Goodwin (Eds.), The New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 1342–1349). Oxford University Press.
Merten, T., Merckelbach, H., Giger, P., & Stevens, A. (2016). The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI): A new instrument for the assessment of symptom overreporting. Psychological Injury and Law, 9(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9257-3
Mestdagh, I., van Bergen, L., Kocken, C., Heyvaert, V., Cras, P., & van den Eede, F. (2019). Diagnosing solvent-induced chronic toxic encephalopathy: The effect of underperformance in neuropsychological testing. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 23(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2019.1571210
Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exeggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
Ord, A. S., Shura, R. D., Sansone, A. R., Martindale, S. L., Taber, K. H., & Rowland, J. A. (2021). Performance validity and symptom validity tests: Are they measuring different constructs? Neuropsychology, 35(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000722
Patrick, S. D., Rapport, L. J., Kanser, R. J., Hanks, R. A., & Bashem, J. B. (2021). Performance validity assessment using response time on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1716997
Pollock, B., Harrison, A. G., & Armstrong, I. T. (2021). What can we learn about performance validity from TOVA response profiles? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(4), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2021.1932762
Plomin, R. (1986). Development, genetics, and psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rey, A. (1941). L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encéphalopathie traumatique [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives De Psychologie, 28, 286–340.
Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A. M., & Leonard, K. (1998). Acomparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and Human Behavior, 22(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025714808591
Schroeder, R. W., Clark, H. A., & Martin, P. K. (2021). Base rates of invalidity when patients undergoing routine clinical evaluations have social security disability as an external incentive. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1895322
Sherman, E. M. S., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of Malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy Psychiatry and the Law, 25(2), 183–189.
Steck, P., Reuter, B., Meir-Korrell, S., & Schçnle, P. (2000). Zur Simulierbarkeit von neuropsychologischen Defiziten bei Reaktions- und bei Intelligenztests [About the simulation of neuropsychological deficits in reaction and intelligence tests]. Zeitschrift Für Neuropsychologie, 11(3), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1024//1016-264X.11.3.128
Stevens, A., Bahlo, S., Licha, C., Liske, B., & Vossler-Thies, E. (2016). Reaction time as an indicator of insufficient effort: Development and validation of an embedded performance validity parameter. Psychiatry Research, 245, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.022
Stevens, A., & Merten, T. (2010). Psychomotor retardation: Authentic or malingered? A comparative study of subjects with and without traumatic brain injury and experimental simulators. German Journal of Psychiatry, 13(1), 1–8.
Strauss, E., Slick, D. J., Levy-Bencheton, J., Hunter, M., MacDonald, S. W. S., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). Intraindividual variability as an indicator of malingering in head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(5), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00126-3
Sturm, W., & Willmes, K. (2001). On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness. NeuroImage, 14(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.083
Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000087
Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2007). Coaching and malingering: A review. Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 287–311). Oxford University Press.
Sweet, J. J., Heilbronnner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Participants, C. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
Tombaugh, T. N., & Rees, L. (2000). Manual for the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP). Carleton University.
Vagnini, V. L., Berry, D. T., Clark, J. A., & Jiang, Y. (2008). New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: Applying reaction time and event-related potentials. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(7), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701754746
van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N., & Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.835447
Whiteside, D. M., Hunt, I., Choate, A., Caraher, C., & Basso, M. R. (2020). Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1695749
Willison, J., & Tombaugh, T. N. (2006). Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.005
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., & Herron, T. J. (2015a). The effects of repeated testing, simulated malingering, and traumatic brain injury on high-precision measures of simple visual reaction time. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., & Herron, T. J. (2015b). The effects of repeated testing, simulated malingering, and traumatic brain injury on visual choice reaction time. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00595
World Health Organization. (2011). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems – ICD-10. Tenth revision. Volume 2: Instruction manual. 2010 edition. World Health Organization.
Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (1995). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) [Test for Attention Performance]. Psytest.
Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (2002). A test battery for attentional performance. In M. Leclercq & P. Zimmermann (Eds.), Applied Neuropsychology of Attention: Theory, Diagnosis and Rehabilitation (pp. 110–151). Taylor & Francis.