Mosaic governance in Denmark: a systematic investigation of green volunteers in nature management in Denmark

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 38 - Trang 4177-4192 - 2022
Sandra Gentin1, Lise Byskov Herslund1, Natalie Marie Gulsrud1, Julia Bjerre Hunt2
1Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
2Zealand Academy of Technologies and Business, Roskilde, Denmark

Tóm tắt

This paper explores green volunteering in Denmark from the perspective of nature managers in municipalities and state nature agencies. The aim is to explore and establish, for the first time, an understanding of the nature and extent of volunteering in Danish nature management from a mosaic governance perspective. The objective was to understand how patterns of volunteerism in Denmark align with the theoretical planning of mosaic governance. The study employed a questionnaire survey, conducted in 2018, covering all Danish municipalities and Nature Agency units designed to investigate topics such as: the extent of volunteering, the types of volunteers, the areas and tasks the volunteers engage in, and the benefits and challenges of the collaboration. Our results show that nature managers collaborate with a variety of volunteers, involved in maintenance, construction and operation activities in both urban and rural areas. Most projects are bottom-up initiatives started by volunteers. The main reason for engaging volunteers is to acknowledge volunteers’ enthusiasm and heighten their interest in nature, although the engagement of volunteers can be time-consuming. In most municipalities, engaging volunteers is not formalized through strategies. It is handled as an “add-on” to an already demanding work burden. There is considerable variation in the way municipalities and the Nature Agency units engage volunteers. Some embrace volunteering, while others are skeptical about it. The engagement of volunteers supports nature that is both more accessible and better managed. Further, volunteerism increases the number of outdoor recreation facilities by supplementing the capacity of baseline nature management.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aalbers CBEM, Sehested K (2018) Critical upscaling. How citizens’ initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban For Urban Green 29:261–275 Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E, Pittman J, Bassett H, Gelcich S, Allison EH (2018) Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environ Manag 61:597–614 Blanco I, Griggs S, Sullivan H (2014) Situating the local in the neoliberalisation and transformation of urban governance. Urban Stud 51:3129–3146 Breuste J, Artmann M, Li J, Xie M (2015) Special issue on green infrastructure for urban sustainability. J Urban Plan Dev 141:A2015001 Buijs A, Hansen R, Van der Jagt S, Ambrose-Oji B, Elands B, Rall EL, Møller MS (2019) Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective. Urban For Urban Green 40:53–62 Buijs AE, Mattijssen TJ, Van der Jagt AP, Ambrose-Oji B, Andersson E, Elands BH, Møller MS (2016) Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 22:1–6 Center for Frivilligt Socialt Arbejde (2016) Tal om frivillighed i Danmark. Center for Frivilligt Socialt Arbejde, Odense Dempsey N, Burton M (2012) Defining place-keeping: the long-term management of public spaces. Urban For Urban Green 11:11–20 de Wilde M, Hurenkamp M, Tonkens E (2014) Flexible relations, frail contacts and failing demands: how community groups and local institutions interact in local governance in the Netherlands. Urban Stud 51:3365–3382 Fors H, Molin JF, Murphy MA, Konijnendijk van den Bosch C (2015) User participation in urban green spaces—for the people or the parks? Urban For Urban Green 14:722–734 Gentin S, Kristensen LS, Sørensen EM, Nielsen AB (2019) Elmelund Skov - skovrejsning gennem partnerskaber. Frederiksberg Gulsrud NM, Hertzog K, Shears I (2018) Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne? Investigating “green placemaking” as a nature-based solution. Environ Res 161:158–167 Henninger DJS (2018) Mosaic governance: combining strategic greenspace planning with urban green active citizenship to enhance urban green infrastructure. Master Thesis Hjortsø CN, Busck AG, Fabricius MK (2006) Frivilligt arbejde i dansk naturforvaltning. Skov & Landskab, Frederiksberg Hunt J (2017) Frivillige i naturen - Håndbog til praktikere om involvering af frivillige. København Ibsen B, Levinsen K (2017) Kommunale institutioners samarbejde med foreninger og frivillige. Institut for Idræt og Biomekanik, Syddansk Universitet Lawrence A, De Vreese R, Johnston M, Van Den Bosch CCK, Sanesi G (2013) Urban forest governance: towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban For Urban Green 12:464–473 Mattijssen T, Buijs A, Elands B (2018) The benefits of self-governance for nature conservation: a study on active citizenship in the Netherlands. J Nat Conserv 43:19–26 Mattijssen TJM, Van der Jagt APN, Buijs AE, Elands BHM, Erlwein S, Lafortezza R (2017) The long-term prospects of citizens managing urban green space: from place making to place-keeping? Urban For Urban Green 26:78–84 Mohammadian HD, Rezaie F (2020) i-Sustainability plus theory as an innovative path towards sustainable world founded on blue-green ubiquitous cities (case studies: Denmark and South Korea). Inventions 2020 5(2):14 Molin JF, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC (2014) Between Big Ideas and Daily Realities—the roles and perspectives of Danish municipal green space managers on public involvement in green space maintenance. Urban For Urban Green 13:553–561 Pagès M, Fischer A, van der Wal R, Lambin X (2019) Empowered communities or “cheap labour”? Engaging volunteers in the rationalised management of invasive alien species in Great Britain. J Environ Manag 229:102–111 Pauleit S, Andersson E, Anton B, Buijs A, Haase D, Hansen R, Van der Jagt S (2019) Urban green infrastructure—connecting people and nature for sustainable cities. Urban For Urban Green 40:1–3 Pauleit S, Hansen R, Rall EL, Sölch T, Andersson E, Luz AC, Szaraz L, Tosics I, Verikko K (2017) Urban landscapes and green infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389414.013.23 Randrup TB, Svännel J, Sunding A, Jansson M, Sang ÅO (2021) Urban open space management in the Nordic countries. Identification of current challenges based on managers’ perceptions. Cities 115:103225 Rosol M (2012) Community volunteering as neoliberal strategy? Green space production in Berlin. Antipode 44:239–257 Stern MJ, Coleman KJ (2015) The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 28:117–132