Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Hơn những gì thấy được: Các hiệu ứng ngữ cảnh trong việc nhận diện từ
Tóm tắt
Ảnh hưởng của ngữ cảnh ngữ nghĩa đối với việc nhận diện từ đã được nghiên cứu thông qua các hiển thị mục tiêu bị che khuất. Các từ gợi ý liên quan đã nâng cao một thước đo phát hiện tín hiệu về độ nhạy khi ra quyết định từ vựng và xác định xem một từ thí nghiệm có khớp với từ mục tiêu hay không. Khi sử dụng hình vẽ phác thảo làm từ gợi ý, một lợi ích tương tự đã đạt được trong nhiệm vụ thí nghiệm. Mặc dù những kết quả này gợi ý rằng thông tin ngữ cảnh ảnh hưởng đến việc mã hóa cảm giác, nhưng kết luận này được đặt ra nghi vấn vì độ nhạy trong các nhiệm vụ này có thể được xác định bởi các đóng góp độc lập của thông tin cảm giác và ngữ cảnh. Tính khả thi của quan điểm này được hỗ trợ bởi một mô hình mô phỏng các thí nghiệm sử dụng mô hình kết nối, trong đó thông tin cảm giác và thông tin ngữ nghĩa đóng góp độc lập vào việc nhận diện từ. Mô hình này cũng dự đoán các kết quả với hai phương pháp phân tích khác đã được sử dụng để lập luận cho các hiệu ứng gợi ý đối với việc mã hóa cảm giác.
Từ khóa
#ngữ cảnh #nhận diện từ #thông tin cảm giác #từ gợi ý #mã hóa cảm giácTài liệu tham khảo
Antos, S. J. (1979). Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 527–545.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Becker, C. A., &Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 389–401.
Besner, D. (1983). Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 429–438.
Besner, D., &Johnston, J. C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the uptake of visual information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (pp. 291–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 468–482.
Borowsky, R., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 272–276.
Borowsky, R., &Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 813–840.
Borowsky, R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 63–85.
Bub, D. N., &Arguin, M. (1995). Visual word activation in pure alexia.Brain & Language,49, 77–103.
Busey, T. A., &Loftus, G. R. (1994). Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition.Psychological Review,101, 446–469.
Clarke, R., &Morton, J. (1983). Cross modality facilitation in tachistoscopic word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 79–96.
Connine, C. M., &Clifton, C. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 291–299.
Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 275–277.
Erber, N. (1969). Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,12, 423–425.
Farah, M. (1989). Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 188–194.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 27–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 465–495.
Goodman, L. A., &Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications.Journal of the American Statistical Association,49, 732–764.
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas.Psychological Bulletin,75, 424–429.
Hale, B. L., & Johnston, J. C. (1983, November).How sentence context affects word identification: A signal detection theory analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego.
Hebb, D. O. (1949).The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Hinton, G. E., &Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.Psychological Review,98, 74–95.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,79, 2554–2558.
Jackson, A., &Morton, J. (1984). Facilitation of auditory word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 568–574.
Johnston, J. C., &Hale, B. L. (1984). The influence of prior context on word identification: Bias and sensitivity effects. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 243–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Joordens, S., Masson, M. E. J., & Besner, D. (1995, November). Connectionist models and additive effects: Are distinct stages of processing necessary? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Krueger, L. E., &Shapiro, R. G. (1979). Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: Evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 657–673.
Loftus, G. R., Busey, T. A., &Senders, J. W. (1993). Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 535–554.
Loftus, G. R., Duncan, J., &Gehrig, P. (1992). On the time course of perceptual information that results from a brief visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 530–549.
Loftus, G. R., &Ruthruff, E. (1994). A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensityduration trade-offs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 33–49.
Massaro, D. W. (1979). Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 595–609.
Massaro, D. W. (1987).Speech by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,21, 398–421.
Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. M. (1990). Perception of synthesized audible and visible speech.Psychological Science,1, 55–63.
Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 558–614.
Massaro, D. W., &Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind.Annual Review of Psychology,44, 383–425.
Massaro, D. W., &Oden, G. C. (1995). Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1053–1064.
Massaro, D. W., Weldon, M. S., &Kitzis, S. N. (1991). Integration of orthographic and semantic information in memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 277–287.
Masson, M. E. J. (1988). The integration of sentence context and perceptual analysis in word identification.Memory & Cognition,16, 489–496.
Masson, M. E. J. (1989). Lexical ambiguity resolution in a constraint satisfaction network. In G. M. Olson & E. E. Smith (Eds.),Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 757–764). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Masson, M. E. J. (1991a). Constraints on the interaction between context and stimulus information. In K. J. Hammond & D. G. Gentner (Eds.),Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 540–545). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Masson, M. E. J. (1991b). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 3–23.
Masson, M. E. J., &Borowsky, R. (1995). Unsettling questions about semantic ambiguity in connectionist models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 509–514.
Masson, M. E. J., &MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Contributions of processing fluency to repetition effects in masked word identification.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 9–21.
McClelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 1–44.
McClelland, J. L., &Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,18, 1–86.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
McGurk, H., &MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature,264, 746–748.
McNichol, D. (1972).A primer of signal detection theory. London: Allen & Unwin.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 98–118). New York: Academic Press.
Miller, G. A., &Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 217–228.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychology Review,76, 165–178.
Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 1, pp. 259–268). New York: Plenum.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Nelson, T. O. (1986). ROC curves and measures of discrimination accuracy: A reply to Swets.Psychological Bulletin,100, 128–132.
Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming.Cognition,22, 93–136.
Norris, D. (1995). Signal detection theory and modularity: On being sensitive to the power of bias models of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 935–939.
Oden, G. C., &Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception.Psychological Review,85, 172–191.
Paul, S. T., Kellas, G., &Juola, J. F. (1992). Priming effects on lexical access and decision processes: A signal-detection analysis.Psychological Research,54, 202–211.
Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1037–1052.
Plaut, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 17, pp. 37–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,3, 111–132.
Reicher, G. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280.
Reingold, E. M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1993). Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: Evidence from the lettersuperiority effect.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 166–178.
Reinitz, M. T., &Alexander, R. (1996). Mechanisms of facilitation in primed perceptual identification.Memory & Cognition,24, 129–135.
Reinitz, M. T., Wright, E., &Loftus, G. R. (1989). Effects of semantic priming on visual encoding of pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 280–297.
Rhodes, G., Parkin, A. J., &Tremewan, T. (1993). Semantic priming and sensitivity in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 154–165.
Rhodes, G., &Tremewan, T. (1993). The Simon then Garfunkel effect: Semantic priming, sensitivity, and the modularity of face recognition.Cognitive Psychology,25, 147–187.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Smith, M. C., &Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 373–392.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention.Memory & Cognition,7, 77–85.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II (pp. 276–315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sumby, W. H., &Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,26, 212–215.
Tanner, W. P., &Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection.Psychological Review,61, 401–409.
Theios, J., &Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.Psychological Review,96, 5–24.
Tulving, E., &Gold, C. (1963). Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,66, 319–327.
Vitkovitch, M., &Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It’s in the links.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 664–680.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.
