More on the Conceptual and the Empirical: Misunderstandings, Clarifications, and Replies

Michael S. Pardo1, Dennis Patterson2,3,4
1School of Law, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA
2European University Institute, Florence, Italy
3Swansea University, Wales, UK
4Rutgers University, Camden, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Pardo, Michael S., and Patterson, Dennis. 2010. Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Univ. of Illinois Law Review (forthcoming).

Pardo, Michael S. 2006. Neuroscience evidence, legal culture, and criminal procedure. American Journal of Criminal Law 33: 301.

Monti, Martin M. et al. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine (February 3).

Mele, Alfred R. 2009. Effective intentions: the power of conscious will.

Easton, Susan. 1998. The case for the right to silence, 2nd ed, 271.

Pardo, Michael S. 2009. Self-incrimination and the epistemology of testimony. Cardozo Law Review 30: 1023.

Wilson, Mark. 2006. Wandering significance: an essay on conceptual behavior.

Fallis, Don. 2009. What is lying? Journal of Philosophy 106:29.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 2002. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. In Heuristics & biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, Griffin and Kahneman, 19–48.

Coleman, Jules L., and Ori Simchen. 2009. ‘Law’. Legal Theory 9: 1.

Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The philosophy of philosophy 187–95.