Moral hazard and the composition of transfers: theory and evidence from cross-border transfers
Tóm tắt
We study how a donor can use restricted transfers to control the moral hazard behavior of a recipient and how the composition of unrestricted and restricted transfers is adjusted in response to changes in the moral hazard behavior of the recipient. Under certain conditions, our game-theoretic model predicts that the donor reduces the proportion of restricted transfers in total transfers as the moral hazard behavior of the recipient declines. Using foreign aid transfers (i.e., project aid and program aid) and panel data covering the period 1991–2007, we find econometric support for the prediction of the model. Our results suggest that some variables that affect the size of foreign aid may have no effect on the composition of aid.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alesina A, Dollar D (2000) Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? J Econ Growth 5:33–63
Andolfatto D (2002) A theory of inalienable property rights. J Polit Econ 110:382–393
Barro RJ (1973) The control of politicians: an economic model. Public Choice 14:19–42
Becker L, Wolf J, Levine R (2006) Measuring commitment to health: global health indicators working group report. Center for Global Development, Washington D.C. http://www.cgdev.org/doc/ghprn/Final%20Indicators%20Consultation%20Report.pdf
Besley T (2006) Principled agents? The political economy of good government, the Lindahl lectures. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Besley T, Case A (1995) Incumbent behavior: voting seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85:25–45
Besley T, Coate S (1991) Public provision of private goods and the redistribution of income. Am Econ Rev 81:979–984
Besley T, Coate S (1992) Workfare versus welfare: incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty alleviation programs. Am Econ Rev 82:249–261
Besley T, Prat A (2006) Handcuffs for the grabbing hand?: media capture and government accountability. Am Econ Rev 96:720–736
Besley T, Smart M (2007) Fiscal restraints and voter welfare. J Public Econ 91:755–773
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1988) Cash versus kind, self selection, and efficient transfers. Am Econ Rev 78:691–700
Boadway RW (1997) Public economics and the theory of public policy. Can J Econ 30:753–772
Boadway RW (1998) The Mirrlees approach to the theory of economic policy. Int Tax Public Financ 5:67–81
Bruce N, Waldman M (1991) Transfers in kind: why they can be efficient and nonpaternalistic. Am Econ Rev 81:1345–1351
Coate S (1989) Cash versus direct food relief. J Dev Econ 30:199–224
Coate S (1995) Altruism, the Samaritan’s Dilemma, and government transfer policy. Am Econ Rev 85:46–57
Coate S, Morris S (1995) On the form of transfers to special interests. J Polit Econ 105:1210–1235
Currie J, Gahvari F (2008) Transfers in cash and in-kind: theory meets data. J Econ Lit 46:333–383
Danzinger S, Haveman R, Plotnick R (1981) How income transfer programs affect work, savings, and income distribution: a critical review. J Econ Lit 19:975–1028
Dobkin C, Puller SL (2007) The effects of government transfers on monthly cycles in drug abuse, hospitalization, and mortality. J Public Econ 91:2137–2157
Ferejohn J (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50:5–25
Fraker T, Moffitt R (1988) The effect of food stamps on labor supply: a bivariate selection model. J Public Econ 35:25–56
Gahvari F, de Mattos EC (2007) Conditional cash transfers, public provision of private goods and income redistribution. Am Econ Rev 97:491–502
Gyimah-Brempong K, Munoz de Camacho S (2006) Corruption and economic growth: are there regional differences? Econ Gov 7:245–269
Hausman JA, Leanord GK (1997) Superstars in the national basketball association: economic value and policy. J Labor Econ 15:586–624
Holmstrom B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. Rev Econ Stud 66:169–182
Kuziemko I, Werker E (2006) How much is a seat on the security council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations. J Polit Econ 114:905–930
Marton J, Wildasin DE (2007) State government cash and in-kind benefits: intergovernmental fiscal transfers and cross-program substitution. J Urban Econ 61:1–20
Mauro P (1998) Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 69:263–279
Moffitt R (1983) An economic model of welfare stigma. Am Econ Rev 73:1023–1035
Moffitt R (1989) Estimating the value of an in-kind transfer: the case of food stamps. Econometrica 57:385–409
Moffitt R (1990) Has state redistribution policy grown more conservative? Natl Tax J 43:123–142
Moffitt R (1992) Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: a review. J Econ Lit 30:1–61
Neumayer E (2003) The pattern of aid giving: the impact of good governance on development assistance. Routledge, London
Nichols AL, Zeckhauser RJ (1982) Targeting transfers through restrictions on recipients. Am Econ Rev 72:372–377
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005) Survey on harmonisation and alignment: measuring aid harmonisation and alignment in 14 partner countries. OECD, Paris
Papke L, Wooldridge J (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates. J Appl Econom 11:619–632
Pedersen K (2001) The Samaritan’s Dilemma and the effectiveness of development aid. Int Tax Public Financ 8:693–703
Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (1997) Separation of powers and political accountability. Q J Econ 112:1163–1202
Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Svensson J (2003) Why conditional aid doesn’t work and what can be done about it? J Dev Econ 70:381–402
van de Walle N, Johnston T (1996) Improving aid to Africa. Overseas Development Council, Washington, DC
Wagner J (2003) Unobserved firm heterogeneity and size-exports nexus: evidence from German panel data. Rev World Econ 139:161–172
World Bank (1998) Assessing aid: what works, what doesn’t, and why. World Bank, Washington, DC