Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence

Floridi, L., et al.: AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Mind. Mach. 28(4), 689–707 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Russell, S.J.: Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking (2019)

AI for humanity, AI for Humanity. https://www.aiforhumanity.fr. (Accessed 27 Aug 2020)

AI for humanity, Mila. https://mila.quebec/en/ai-society/. (Accessed 27 Aug 2020)

Tenets, Partnership on AI. https://www.partnershiponai.org/tenets/. (Accessed 27 Aug 2020)

National Governance Committee for the New Generation Artificial Intelligence (NGCNGAI): Governance principles for the new generation artificial intelligence-Developing responsible artificial intelligence, China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201906/17/WS5d07486ba3103dbf14328ab7.html (2018). (Accessed 27 Aug 2020)

Floridi, L., Sanders, J.W.: On the morality of artificial agents. Mind. Mach. 14(3), 349–379 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d

Coeckelbergh, M.: Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics Inf. Technol. 12(3), 209–221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9235-5

Gunkel, D.J.: Robot rights. MIT Press (2018)

Danaher, J.: Welcoming robots into the moral circle: A defence of ethical behaviorism. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26(4), 2023–2049 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x

Abdilla, A., Arista, N., Baker, K., Benesiinaabandan, S., Brown, M., Cheung, M., et al.: Beyond imperial tools: Future-proofing technology through Indigenous governance and traditional knowledge systems. In: Abdilla, A., Harle, J. (eds.) decolonising the digital: technology as cultural practice, pp. 67–81. Tactical Space Lab (2018)

Lewis, J.E., Arista, N., Pechawis, A., Kite, S.: Making kin with the machines. J. Design Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21428/bfafd97b

Lewis, J.E., et al.: Indigenous protocol and artificial intelligence position paper. In: Hawai, H. (ed.) The initiative for indigenous futures and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) (2020)

Sotala, K., Gloor, L.: Superintelligence as a cause or cure for risks of astronomical suffering. Informatica 41(4), 389–400 (2017)

Baum, S.D.: Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence. AI Soc. 35(1), 165–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0760-1

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E.: The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intelligence 1(9), 389–399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-0190088-2

Curry, P.: Ecological ethics: an introduction, 2nd ed fully rev and expanded. Polity Press (2011)

Katz, E.: Is there a place for animals in the moral consideration of nature? Ethics Animals 4(3), 74–87 (2011). https://doi.org/10.15368/ea.1983v4n3.1

Rønnow-Rasmussen, T., Zimmerman, M.J.: Recent work on intrinsic value. Springer (2005)

Baum, S.D.: Value typology in cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Values 21(4), 499–524 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41714206

Bradley, B.: Extrinsic value. Philos. Stud. 91(2), 109–126 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004269309760

Singer, P.: Animal liberation: towards an end to man’s inhumanity to animals. Paladin Books (1977)

Regan, T.: The case for animal rights, 1st edn. University of California Press (1983)

Rolston, H., III.: Environmental ethics: duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press (1988)

Taylor, P.: Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press (1986)

Cockell, C.S.: Originism: ethics and extraterrestrial life. J. Br. Interdisc. Soc. 60(4), 147–153 (2007)

Jonas, H.: The phenomenon of life. Toward a philosophical biology. Harper and Row (1966)

Callicott, J.B.: In defense of the land ethic. Essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press (1989)

Rolston, H., III.: The preservation of natural value in the solar system. In: Hargrove, E. (ed.) Beyond spaceship earth: environmental ethics and the solar system, pp. 140–182. Sierra Club Books (1986)

Milligan, T.: Nobody owns the moon: the ethics of space exploitation. McFarland and Company (2015)

Buchanan, A.: Human nature and enhancement. Bioethics 23(3), 141–150 (2009)

Hubbard, F.P.: Do androids dream? Personhood and intelligent artifacts. Temple Law Rev. 83, 405–474 (2011)

Umbrello, S., Sorgner, S.L.: Nonconscious cognitive suffering: considering suffering risks of embodied artificial intelligence. Philosophies 4(24), 1–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4020024

Ziesche, S., Yampolskiy, R.: Towards AI welfare science and policies. Big Data Cognitive Comput. 3(2), 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3010002

Floridi, L.: On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics Inf. Technol. 4(4), 287–304 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021342422699

Lupisella, M.: Cosmological theories of value: relationalism and connectedness as foundations for cosmic creativity. In: Milligan, T., Schwartz, J.S.J. (eds.) The ethics of space exploration, pp. 75–91. Springer International Publishing Switzerland (2016)

Baum, S. D.: A survey of artificial general intelligence projects for ethics, risk, and policy. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Working Paper 17–1 (2017). doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070741

Garner, R.: A theory of justice for animals: animal rights in a nonideal world. Oxford University Press (2013)

Higgins, P., Short, D., South, N.: Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime Law Soc. Change 59, 251–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9413-6

Fitzgerald, M., Boddy, A., & Baum, S.D.: 2020 Survey of artificial general intelligence projects for ethics, risk, and policy. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Technical Report 20–1 (2020)

Pichai, S.: AI at Google: our principles. Google. https://blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/ (2018). (Accessed 12 Mar 2020)

OpenAI Charter. OpenAI. https://openai.com/charter/ (9 April 2018). (Accessed 11 Mar 2020)

Responsible AI. Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/responsible-ai. (Accessed on 12 Mar 2020)

Nadella, S.: Microsoft’s CEO Explores How Humans and A.I. Can Solve Society’s Challenges—Together. Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/technology/2016/06/microsoft-ceo-satya-nadella-humans-and-a-i-can-work-together-to-solve-societys-challenges.html (2016). (Accessed on 27 Aug 2020)

AI for Earth. Microsoft AI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ai-for-earth. (Accessed on 28 Aug 2020)

Agrimetrics. Microsoft AI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ai-for-earth-agrimetrics. (Accessed on 27 Aug 2020)

Wild me joins AI for Earth. Microsoft. https://news.microsoft.com/2018/06/14/wild-me-joins-ai-for-earth/ (2018). (Accessed on 27 Aug 2020)

AI for Good Foundation. AI for good foundation. https://ai4good.org/. (Accessed on 22 Feb 2021)

The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence: Report. The Japanese society for artificial intelligence ethical guidelines. http://www.ai-elsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/JSAI-Ethical-Guidelines-1.pdf (2017). (Accessed on 27 Aug 2020)

AI Principles. Future of life institute. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/. (Accessed on 18 Aug 2020)

ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. Association for Computing Machinery. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics. (Accessed on 28 Aug 2020)

Dubber, M., Pasquale, F., Das, S. (eds.): The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. Oxford University Press (2020)

Liao, S.M. (ed.): Ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press (2020)

Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). (Accessed on 27 Aug 2020)

O’Neil, C.: Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishers (2016)

Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of oppression. NYU Press (2018)

Fill, A., Penz, H. (eds.): The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge (2018)

Stibbe, A.: Ecolinguistics: language, ecology and the stories we live by, 2nd edn. Routledge (2021)

Heugerber, R.: Overcoming anthropocentrism with anthropomorphic and physiocentric uses of language? In: Fill, A., Penz, H. (eds.) The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, pp. 342–354. Routledge (2018)

Sharkey, A.: Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity. Ethics Inf. Technol. 21, 75–87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9494-0

Paul, C., Hanley, N., Meyer, S.T., Fürst, C., Weisser, W.W., Knoke, T.: On the functional relationship between biodiversity and economic value. Sci. Adv. 5(6), 7712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax7712

Berry, P.M., Fabok, V., Blicharska, M., Bredin, Y.K., Llorente, M.G., Kovacs, E., et al.: Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 27(7), 1741–1762 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-0161173-z

Bugter, R., Harrison, P., Haslett, J., Tinch, R.: Making a better case for biodiversity conservation: the BESAFE project. Biodiv. Conserv. 27(7), 1549–1560 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1543-9

Adams, W.M., Hutton, J.: People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Soc. 5(2), 147–183 (2007)

Garrard, G.: Ecocriticism. Routledge (2012)

Morton, T.: Dark ecology: for a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press (2016)

Birch, J., Schnell, A.K., Clayton, N.S.: Dimensions of animal consciousness. Trends Cognitive Sci 24(10), 789–801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.007

Baum, S.D.: Universalist ethics in extraterrestrial encounter. Acta Astronaut. 66(3), 617–623 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.07.003

Johansson-Stenman, O.: Animal welfare and social decisions: Is it time to take Bentham seriously? Ecol. Econ. 145, 90–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.019

Bruskotter, J.T., Nelson, M.P., Vucetich, J.A.: Does nature possess intrinsic value? An empirical assessment of Americans’ beliefs. The Ohio State University (2015)

Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E.: Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 22(4), 43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443

Sommer, K., Nielsen, M., Draheim, M., Redshaw, J., Vanman, E.J., Wilks, M.: Children’s perceptions of the moral worth of live agents, robots, and inanimate objects. J. Exp. Child Psychol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.009

Nijssen, S.R.R., Müller, B.C.N., van Baaren, R.B.: Paulus, M: Saving the robot or the human? Robots who feel deserve moral care. Soc. Cogn. 37(1), 41–56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.1.41

BP: Energy Outlook: 2020 Edition. BP. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2020.pdf (2020). (Accessed 26 Apr 2020)

Sorbaro, M., Liu, Q., Bortone, M., Sheik, S.: Optimizing the energy consumption of spiking neural networks for neuromorphic applications. ArXiv191201268 CsQ-Bio 14, 662 (2020)

Strubell, E., Ganesh A., & McCallum, A.: Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650. Florence, Italy (2019)

Sen, A.: Behavior and the concept of preference. Economica 40(159), 241–259 (1973)