Moral autonomy of patients and legal barriers to a possible duty of health related data sharing

Ethics and Information Technology - Tập 25 Số 1 - 2023
Anton Vedder1, Daniela Spajić1
1Centre for IT & IP Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Tóm tắt

AbstractInformed consent bears significant relevance as a legal basis for the processing of personal data and health data in the current privacy, data protection and confidentiality legislations. The consent requirements find their basis in an ideal of personal autonomy. Yet, with the recent advent of the global pandemic and the increased use of eHealth applications in its wake, a more differentiated perspective with regards to this normative approach might soon gain momentum. This paper discusses the compatibility of a moral duty to share data for the sake of the improvement of healthcare, research, and public health with autonomy in the field of data protection, privacy and medical confidentiality. It explores several ethical-theoretical justifications for a duty of data sharing, and then reflects on how existing privacy, data protection, and confidentiality legislations could obstruct such a duty. Consent, as currently defined in the General Data Protection Regulation – a key legislative framework providing rules on the processing of personal data and data concerning health – and in the recommendation of the Council of Europe on the protection of health-related data – explored here as soft-law – turns out not to be indispensable from various ethical perspectives, while the requirement of consent in the General Data Protection Regulation and the recommendation nonetheless curtails the full potential of a duty to share medical data. Also other legal grounds as possible alternatives for consent seem to constitute an impediment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Angst, C. M. (2009). Protect my privacy or support the Common-Good? Ethical questions about Electronic Health Information exchanges. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0385-5

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Seventh Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Beauchamp, T. L. (1991). Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Boogerd, E. A., Arts, T., Engelen, L. J., & van de Belt, T. H. (2015). “What is eHealth”: Time for an update? JMIR Res Protoc, 4(1), e29. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4065

Brazier, M. (2006). Do no harm – do patients have responsibilities too? Cambridge Law Journal, 65(2), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007161

Budin-Ljøsne, I., Teare, H. J. A., Kaye, J., Beck, S., Bentzen, H. B., Caenazzo, L., Collett, C., D’Abramo, F., Felzmann, H., Finlay, T., Javaid, M. K., Jones, E., Katić, V., Simpson, A., & Mascalzoni, D. (2017). Dynamic consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research. BMC Medical Ethics, 18, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9

Buetow, S. (2014). Why patients have a moral obligation to give care to clinicians. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20, 890–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12116

Cohen, G. (2018). Is there a duty to share Healthcare Data? In G. Cohen, H. F. Lynch, E. Vayena, E, & U. Gasser (Eds.), Big Data, Health Law, and Bioethics (pp. 209–222). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108147972.020

Council of Europe (2015). Introductory report for updating recommendation R

(97) 5 of the Council of Europe on the protection of medical data by Malafosse, J.B., T-PD(2015)07. https://rm.coe.int/introductory-report-for-updating-recommendation-r-97-5-of-the-council-/168073510c

Davies, B., & Savulescu, J. (2019). Solidarity and responsibility in healthcare. Public Health Ethics, 12(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phz008

de Groot, N., van Beers, B. C., & Meynen, G. (2021). Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective. Journal Of Medical Ethics, 47, 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107568

Donnelly, M., & McDonagh, M. (2019). Health Research, Consent and the GDPR exemption. European Journal of Health Law, 26(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12262427

English, D. C. (2005). Moral Obligations of patients: a clinical view. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 30(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310590926821

European Commission (2018a). Benchmarking Deployment of eHealth among General Practitioners (2018). Final Report. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1286ce7-5c05-11e9-9c52-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

European Commission (2018b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the Digital Single Market; empowering citizens and building a healthier society COM(2018) 2333 final, 25.04.2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A233%3AFIN

European Commission (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A European strategy for data COM(2020) 66 final, 19.2.2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0066

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) (2019). Opinion 3/2019 concerning the Questions and Answers on the interplay between the Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR) and the General Data Protection regulation (GDPR) (art.70.1.b)). Adopted on 23 January 2019. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/opinion-art-70/opinion-32019-concerning-questions-and-answers_en

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) (2020a). Guidelines 04/2020 on the use of location data and contact tracing tools in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. Adopted on 21 April 2020. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-042020-use-location-data-and-contact-tracing_en

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) (2020b). Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679. Version 1.1. Adopted on 4 May 2020. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-052020-consent-under-regulation-2016679_en

European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (2020). A preliminary opinion on data protection and scientific research. 6 January 2020. https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/20-01-06_opinion_research_en.pdf

European Parliament (2019). How the General Data Protection Regulation changes the rules for scientific research. Study – Panel for the Future of Science and Technology. European Parliamentary Research Service. PE 634.447 - July 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2861/17421

Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e20. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20

Fazlioglu, M. (2019). Beyond the “Nature” of data: obstacles to protecting sensitive information in the European Union and the United States. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 46, 271–306. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol46/iss2/2

Opinion of the Data Ethics Commission, German Data Ethics Commission, & Summary, E. (2019). October 2019. https://www.bmj.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Themen/Fokusthemen/Gutachten_DEK_EN.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1

Hall, M. A. (2010). Property, privacy, and the pursuit of interconnected Electronic Medical Records. Iowa Law Review, 95, 631–664.

Hallinan, D. (2020). Broad consent under the GDPR: an optimistic perspective on a bright future. Life Sciences Society and Policy, 16, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-019-0096-3

Harris, J. (2005). Scientific research is a moral duty. Journal Of Medical Ethics, 31, 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.011973

Heyd, D. (1982). Supererogation: its status in ethical theory. Cambridge University Press.

Heyd, D. (2019). Supererogation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/supererogation/

Hohmann, J., & Benzschawel, S. (2013). Data Protection in eHealth Platforms. In R. Beran (Ed.), Legal and forensic medicine (pp. 1633–1658). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_81

Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. Ak. VIII.

Langat, P., Pisartchik, D., Silva, D., Bernard, C., Olsen, K., Smith, M., Sahni, S., & Upshur, R. (2011). Is there a duty to share? Ethics of sharing Research Data in the context of Public Health Emergencies. Public Health Ethics, 4(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phr005

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: a study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

Mill, J. S. (1977). Essays on politics and society. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII - Essays on politics and society Part I. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Mulder, T. (2019). The protection of data concerning Health in Europe. European Data Protection Law Review, 5(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/2/10

Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of Consumer Health Wearables: promises and barriers. Plos Medicine, 13(2), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953

Ploug, T., & Holm, S. (2016). Meta consent – a flexible solution to the problem of secondary use of health data. Bioethics, 30(9), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12286

Porsdam Mann, S., Savulescu, J., & Sahakian, B. J. (2016). Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0130

Pybus, E. M. (1982). Saints and Heroes. Philosophy, 57(220), 193–199. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4619558193–199

Riso, B., Tupasela, A., Vears, D. F., Felzmann, H., Cockbain, J., Loi, M., Kongsholm, N. C. H., Zullo, S., & Rakic, V. (2017). Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms – which values should be considered? Life Sci Soc Policy, 13(12), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0060-z

Rodwin, M. A. (2010). Patient Data: Property, Privacy & the Public Interest. American Journal of Law and Medicine Suffolk University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper 10–24. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1599192

Schaefer, G. O., Emanuel, E. J., & Wertheimer, A. (2009). The Obligation to participate in Biomedical Research. Journal Of The American Medical Association, 302(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.931

Schmidt, H. (2007). Patients’ charters and health responsibilities. British Medical Journal, 335, 1187–1189. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39387.393160.AD

The Article 29 Working Party (2007). Working Document on the processing of personal data relating to health in electronic health records (EHR). Adopted on 15 February 2007. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp131_en.pdf

The Article 29 Working Party (2015). ANNEX ‘health data in apps and devices’ to the letter of the WP29 to the European Commission on the clarification of the scope of the definition of data concerning health in relation to lifestyle and wellbeing apps. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2015/20150205_letter_art29wp_ec_health_data_after_plenary_annex_en.pdf

Urmson, J. O. (1958). Saints and heroes. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press.

Van Veen, E. B. (2018). Observational health research in Europe: understanding the General Data Protection Regulation and underlying debate. European Journal of Cancer, 104, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.032

Vayena, E., & Madoff, L. (2019). Navigating the Ethics of Big Data in Public Health. In A. C. Mastroianni, J. P. Kahn, & N. E. Kass (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics (pp. 354–367). Doi: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190245191.013.31

Vayena, E., Dzenowagis, J., Brownstein, J. S., & Sheikh, A. (2018). Policy implications of big data in the health sector. Bulletin Of The World Health Organization, 96, 66–68. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.197426

Wazny, K. (2018). Applications of crowdsourcing in health: an overview. J Glob Health, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010502

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Ethics and Information Technology

Tập 25 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả