Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with the TALYS Code System

Nuclear Data Sheets - Tập 113 Số 12 - Trang 2841-2934 - 2012
A. J. Koning1, D. Rochman1
1Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group NRG, P.O. Box, 1755 ZG Petten, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Koning, 2008, TALYS-1.0, vol. 211

Koning, 2011, Modern nuclear data evaluation: Straight from nuclear physics to applications, vol. 59, 773

Koning, 2008, Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work, Ann. Nucl. En., 35, 2024, 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.06.004

M. Uhl, B. Strohmaier, “STAPRE”, IRK-Vienna Report IRK-76/01, 1976, (Upd. 1978).

Fu, 1988, Approximation of Precompound Effects in Hauser-Feshbach Codes for Calculating Double Differential (n, xn) Cross Sections, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 100, 61, 10.13182/NSE88-A29015

M. Blann, A.Y. Konobeev, W.B. Wilson, S.G. Mashnik, Manual for Code Alice, 2008, unpublished.

P.G. Young, E.D. Arthur, M.B. Chadwick, Comprehensive Nuclear Model Calculations: Introduction to the Theory and Use of the GNASH Code, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-12343-MS, 1992.

Herman, 2007, EM-PIRE: Nuclear Reaction Model Code System for Data Evaluation, Nucl. Data Sheets, 108, 2655, 10.1016/j.nds.2007.11.003

Chadwick, 2011, ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data, Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2887, 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002

Shibata, 2011, JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 48, 1, 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675

A.J. Koning, M. Avrigeanu, V. Avrigeanu, P. Batistoni, E. Bauge, M.-M. Be, P. Bem, D. Bernard, O. Bersillon, A. Bidaud, O. Bouland, A. Courcelle, C.J. Dean, P. Dos-Santos-Uzarralde, B. Duchemin, I. Duhamel, M.C. Duijvestijn, E. Dupont, U. Fischer, R.A. Forrest, F. Gunsing, W. Haeck, H. Henriksson, A. Hogenbirk, T.D. Huynh, R. Jacqmin, C. Jouanne, J. Keinert, M.A. Kellett, I. Kodeli, J. Kopecky, H. Leeb, D. Leichtle, J. Leppanen, O. Litaize, M.J. Lopez-Jimenez, M. Mattes, E. Menapace, R.W. Mills, B. Morillon, C. Mounier, A.L. Nichols, G. Noguere, C. Nordborg, A. Nouri, R.L. Perel, P. Pereslavtsev, R.J. Perry, M. Pescarini, M. Pillon, A.J.M. Plompen, D. Ridikas, P. Romain, Y. Rugama, P. Rullhusen, C. de Saint Jean, A. Santamarina, E. Sartori, K. Seidel, O. Serot, S. Simakov, J. -Ch Sublet, S. Tagesen, A. Trkov, S.C. van der Marck, H. Vonach, The JEFF evaluated nuclear data project, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France, April 2007, pp. 22–27, editors O.Bersillon, F.Gunsing, E.Bauge, R.Jacqmin, and S.Leray, EDP Sciences, 721 (2008).

Ge, 2010, The Updated Version of Chinese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (CENDL-3.1), 26

Rochman, 2011, How to randomly evaluate nuclear data: a new method applied to 239Pu, Nucl. Sci. and Eng., 169, 68, 10.13182/NSE10-66

J. Raynal, Notes on ECIS94, CEA Saclay Report No. CEA-N-2772, 1994.

Koning, 2003, Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV, Nucl. Phys. A, 713, 231, 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01321-0

Quesada, 2003, Analytical expressions for the dispersive contributions to the nucleon-nucleus optical potential, Phys. Rev. C, 67, 067601, 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.067601

Tamura, 1965, Analyses of the Scattering of Nuclear Particles by Collective Nuclei in Terms of the Coupled-Channel Calculation, Rev. Mod. Phys., 37, 679, 10.1103/RevModPhys.37.679

J.P. Delaroche, in: C.L. Dunford (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on “Nuclear Data Evaluation Methodology”, 1992, October 12–16, Brookhaven, USA, 1992, p. 347.

Olsson, 1990, Neutron elastic and inelastic scattering from Mg, Si, S, Ca, Cr, Fe and Ni AT En = 21.6 MeV, Nucl. Phys. A, 513, 205, 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90096-5

Carlson, 2001, Optical Model Calculations with the Code ECIS95, 61

Sh Soukhovitskii, 2004, Global coupled-channel optical potential for nucleon–actinide interaction from 1 keV to 200 MeV, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 30, 905, 10.1088/0954-3899/30/7/007

Guss, 1989, Optical model description of the neutron interaction with 116Sn and 120Sn over a wide energy range, Phys. Rev. C, 39, 405, 10.1103/PhysRevC.39.405

Satchler, 1983

Hodgson, 1971

Bauge, 2001, Lane-consistent, semimicroscopic nucleon-nucleus optical model, Phys. Rev. C, 63, 024607, 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024607

Capote, 2009, RIPL - Reference Input Parameter Library for Calculations of Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Data Evaluations, Nucl. Data Sheets, 110, 3107, 10.1016/j.nds.2009.10.004

Maréchal, 1999, Proton scattering by short lived sulfur isotopes, Phys. Rev. C, 60, 034615, 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.034615

Sheit, 2000, Proton scattering by the unstable neutron-rich isotopes 42,44Ar, Phys. Rev. C, 63, 014604, 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.014604

Khan, 2001, Proton scattering from the unstable nuclei 30S and 34Ar: structural evolution along the sulfur and argon isotopic chains, Nucl. Phys. A, 694, 103, 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00981-2

Bauge, 2000, Neutron scattering from the 155,156,157,158,160Gd isotopes: Measurements and analyses with a deformed, semimicroscopic optical model, Phys. Rev. C, 61, 034306, 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.034306

Jeukenne, 1976, Manybody theory of nuclear matter, Phys. Rep. C, 25, 83, 10.1016/0370-1573(76)90017-X

Jeukenne, 1974, Opticalmodel potential in nuclear matter from Reidʼs hard core interaction, Phys. Rev. C, 10, 1391, 10.1103/PhysRevC.10.1391

Jeukenne, 1977, Microscopic calculation of the symmetry and Coulomb components of the complex optical-model potential, Phys. Rev. C, 15, 10, 10.1103/PhysRevC.15.10

Jeukenne, 1977, Opticalmodel potential in finite nuclei from Reidʼs hard core interaction, Phys. Rev. C, 16, 80, 10.1103/PhysRevC.16.80

Bauge, 1998, Semimicroscopic nucleon-nucleus spherical optical model for nuclei with A >≃ 40 at energies up to 200 MeV, Phys. Rev. C, 58, 1118, 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1118

Scheerbaum, 1976, Spin-orbit splitting in nuclei near closed shells: (I). Contribution of the two-body spinorbit interaction, Nucl. Phys. A, 257, 77, 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90476-0

Goriely, 2007, The isovector imaginary neutron potential: A key ingredient for the r-process nucleosynthesis, Phys. Lett. B, 653, 178, 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.046

van der Woude, 1991, 99

Kalbach, 2000, Surface and collective effects in preequilibrium reactions, Phys. Rev. C, 62, 44608, 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.044608

Watanabe, 1958, High energy scattering of deuterons by complex nuclei, Nucl. Phys., 8, 484, 10.1016/0029-5582(58)90180-9

D.G. Madland, in: ”Proceedings of a Specialistsʼ Meeting on preequilibrium nuclear reactions”, Semmering, Austria, February 1988, pp. 10–12, 103.

Daehnick, 1980, Global optical model potential for elastic deuteron scattering from 12 to 90 MeV, Phys. Rev. C, 21, 2253, 10.1103/PhysRevC.21.2253

Bojowald, 1988, Elastic deuteron scattering and optical model parameters at energies up to 100 MeV, Phys. Rev. C, 38, 1153, 10.1103/PhysRevC.38.1153

Han, 2006, Deuteron global optical model potential for energies up to 200 MeV, Phys. Rev. C, 74, 044615, 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044615

An, 2006, Global deuteron optical model potential for the energy range up to 183 MeV, Phys. Rev. C, 73, 054605, 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054605

Demetriou, 2002, Improved global α-optical model potentials at low energies, Nucl. Phys. A, 707, 253, 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00756-X

Koning, 2008, Global and local level density models, Nucl. Phys. A, 810, 13, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.06.005

Goriely, 2008, Improved microscopic nuclear level densities within the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov plus combinatorial method, Phys. Rev. C, 78, 064307, 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.064307

Ignatyuk, 1975, Anomalous Influence of the Angular Momentum on the Fission of Light Nuclei by Protons and α Particles, Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys., 21, 255

Myers, 1966, Nuclear masses and deformations, Nucl. Phys., 81, 1, 10.1016/S0029-5582(66)80001-9

Ignatyuk, 1979, The Role of Collective Effects in the Systematics of Nuclear Level Densities, Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys., 29, 450

Ignatyuk, 1993, Density of discrete levels in 116 Sn, Phys. Rev. C, 47, 1504, 10.1103/PhysRevC.47.1504

Grudzevich, 1988, 187

Iljinov, 1992, Phenomenological statistical analysis of level densities, decay widths and lifetimes of excited nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A, 543, 517, 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90278-R

Junghans, 1998, Projectile-fragment yields as a probe for the collective enhancement in the nuclear level density, Nucl. Phys. A, 629, 635, 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00658-7

Hansen, 1983, Energy dependence of the rotational enhancement factor in the level density, Nucl. Phys. A, 406, 236, 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90459-1

Goriely, 2001, A Hartree-Fock Nuclear Mass Table, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 77, 311, 10.1006/adnd.2000.0857

Brink, 1957, Individual particle and collective aspects of the nuclear photoeffect, Nucl. Phys., 4, 215, 10.1016/0029-5582(87)90021-6

Axel, 1962, Electric Dipole Ground-State Transition Width Strength Function and 7-Mev Photon Interactions, Phys. Rev., 126, 671, 10.1103/PhysRev.126.671

Kopecky, 1990, Test of Gamma-Ray Strength Functions in Nuclear Reaction Model Calculations, Phys. Rev. C, 41, 1941, 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.1941

Kopecky, 1993, Radiative strength in the compound nucleus 157Gd, Phys. Rev. C, 47, 312, 10.1103/PhysRevC.47.312

D.G. Gardner, in: A. Michaudon, et al. (Eds.), ”Neutron Radiative Capture”, OECD/NEA Series on Neutron Physics and Nuclear Data in Science and Technology, 1984, p. 62.

J. Kopecky, 2003, private communication.

Chadwick, 1991, Pauli-blocking in the quasideuteron model of photoabsorption, Phys. Rev. C, 44, 814, 10.1103/PhysRevC.44.814

Handbook on ”Photonuclear data for applications, Cross sections and spectra”, IAEA-TECDOC-1178 (2000).

Hilaire, 2003, Comparisons between various width fluctuation correction factors for compound nucleus reactions, Ann. Phys., 306, 209, 10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00076-9

Gaï, 1969

Mamdouh, 2001, Fission barriers of neutron-rich and superheavy nuclei calculated with the ETFSI method, Nucl. Phys. A, 679, 337, 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00358-4

Sierk, 1986, Macroscopic model of rotating nuclei, Phys. Rev. C, 33, 2039, 10.1103/PhysRevC.33.2039

Cohen, 1974, Equilibrium Configurations of Rotating Charged or Gravitating Liquid Masses with Surface Tensor. II, Ann. of Phys., 82, 557, 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90126-2

Sin, 2006, Fission of light actinides: 232Th(n,f) and 231Pa(n,f) reactions, Phys. Rev. C, 74, 014608, 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.014608

DʼArrigo, 1994, Semi-Empirical Determination of the Shell Correction Temperature and Spin Dependence by Means of Nuclear Fisson, Jour. Phys. G, 20, 365, 10.1088/0954-3899/20/2/015

M. Ernebjerg and M. Herman, Assessment of approximate methods for width fluctuation corrections, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology - ND2004, AIP vol. 769, eds. R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, and P. Talou, Sep. 26 - Oct. 1, 2004, Santa Fe, USA, p. 1233 (2005).

Moldauer, 1980, Statistics and the average cross section, Nucl. Phys. A, 344, 185, 10.1016/0375-9474(80)90671-5

Koning, 2004, A global pre-equilibrium analysis from 7 to 200 MeV based on the optical model potential, Nucl. Phys. A, 744, 15, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.08.013

Kalbach, 1986, Two-component exciton model: Basic formalism away from shell closures, Phys. Rev. C, 33, 818, 10.1103/PhysRevC.33.818

Dobeš, 1983, Two-Component Exciton Model, Zeit. Phys. A, 310, 329, 10.1007/BF01419519

Kalbach, 1985, Surface effects in the exciton model of preequilibrium nuclear reactions, Phys. Rev. C, 32, 1157, 10.1103/PhysRevC.32.1157

Akkermans, 1985, Analysis of continuum gamma-ray emission in precompound-decay reactions, Phys. Lett. B, 157, 95, 10.1016/0370-2693(85)91524-2

Kalbach, 2005, Preequilibrium reactions with complex particle channels, Phys. Rev. C, 71, 034606, 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.034606

C. Kalbach, 2007, private communication.

Kalbach, 1988, Systematics of continuum angular distributions: Extensions to higher energies, Phys. Rev. C, 37, 2350, 10.1103/PhysRevC.37.2350

Akkermans, 1981, Random-Walk Model of Precompound Decay: Dynamics and multiparticle emission, Z. Phys. A, 300, 345, 10.1007/BF01419867

Blann, 1983, Global test of modified precompound decay models, Phys. Rev. C, 28, 1475, 10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1475

Gadioli, 1992

Chadwick, 1994, Multiple preequilibrium emission in Feshbach-Kerman-Koonin analyses, Phys. Rev. C, 50, 996, 10.1103/PhysRevC.50.996

Audi, 2003, The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation: (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures, Nucl. Phys. A, 729, 129, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003

Goriely, 2009, Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Nuclear Mass Formulas: Crossing the 0.6 MeV Accuracy Threshold with Microscopically Deduced Pairing, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 152503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.152503

Khan, 2005, Impact of the giant dipole resonance on the photodisintegration of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays, Astroparticle Phys., 23, 191, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.12.007

Goriely, 2008, Astron. Astrop. Jour., 487, 767, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078825

Holmes, 1976, Tables of thermonuclear-reaction-rate data for neutron-induced reactions on heavy nuclei, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 18, 306, 10.1016/0092-640X(76)90011-5

D. Smith, Covariance matrices for nuclear cross sections derived from nuclear model calculations, Tech. Rep. ANL/NDM-159, Argonne National laboratory, 2004.

D. Rochman, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, S. Mughabghab, M. Pigni, T. Kawano, Neutron cross section covariances from thermal energy to 20 MeV, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technologyp. 265, April, Nice, France, 2007, pp. 23–27.

E. Bauge, S. Hilaire, P. Dossantos-Uzarralde, Evaluation of the covariance matrix of neutronic cross sections with the backward-forward Monte Carlo method, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technologyp. 259, April, Nice, France, 2007, pp. 23–27.

Neudecker, 2011, Comparison of Covariance Matrices Obtained by Different Methods, Jour. Kor. Phys. Soc., 59, 1272, 10.3938/jkps.59.1272

H. Henriksson, O. Schwerer, D. Rochman, M. Mikhaylyukova, N. Otuka, The art of collecting experimental data internationally: EXFOR, CINDA and the NRDC network, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technologyp. 197, April, Nice, France, 2007, pp. 23–27.

Chadwick, 2006, ENDF/B-VII.0: Next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology, Nuclear Data Sheets, 107, 2931, 10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001

Mughabghab, 2006

Rochman, 2008, Pb and Bi neutron data libraries with full covariance evaluation and improved integral tests, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A, 589, 85, 10.1016/j.nima.2008.02.003

P. Talou, Prompt fission neutrons calculations in the madland-nix model, Tech. Rep. LA-UR-07-8168, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, December 2007.

Madland, 1982, New Calculation of Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra and Average Prompt Neutron Multiplicities, Nucl. Sci. and Eng., 81, 213, 10.13182/NSE82-5

A. Wahl, Systematics of fission-product yields, Tech. Rep. LA-13928, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, May 2002.

A. Koning, D. Rochman, TENDL-2011: Consistent talys-based evaluated nuclear data library including covariance data, NRG Petten, the Netherlands, Tech. Rep, 2011, www.talys.eu/tendl-2011.

J. Kopecky, M. Delfini, H. van der kamp, D. Nierop, Revisions and extensions of neutron capture cross sections in the european activation file EAF-3, Tech. Rep. ECN-C-952-051, ECN, Petten, the Netherlands, July 1992.

J. Kopecky, D. Nierop, The european activation file EAF-4, summary documentation, Tech. Rep. ECN-C-95-075, ECN, Petten, the Netherlands, December 1995.

R. Brissenden, C. Durston, The calculation of neutron spectra in the doppler region, Tech. Rep. ANL-7050, Argonne National Laboratory, 1965.

J. Sublet, P. Ribon, M. Coste-Delcaux, ”CALENDF-2010: User manual”, Tech. Rep. CEA-R-6277, Commissariat a lʼEnergie Atomique, Saclay, France, 2011.

Ribon, 1986, The resonance self-shielding calculation with regularized random ladders, Annals of Nucl. En., 13, 209, 10.1016/0306-4549(86)90028-9

A.J. Koning, M.C. Duijvestijn, S.C. van der Marck, R. Klein Meulekamp, A. Hogenbirk, ”New nuclear data evaluations for Ca, Sc, Fe, Ge, Pb, and Bi isotopes”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology - ND2004, AIP vol. 769, eds. R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, and P. Talou, Sep. 26 - Oct. 1, 2004, Santa Fe, USA, p. 422 (2005).

Y. Watanabe et al. Nuclear data evaluations for JENDL high-energy file, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology - ND2004, AIP vol. 769, eds. R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, and P. Talou, Sep. 26 - Oct. 1, 2004, Santa Fe, USA, p. 326 (2005).

Konobeyev, 2010, What can we expect from the use of nuclear models implemented in MCNPX at projectile energies below 150 MeV - Detailed comparison with experimental data, vol. 59, 26

F. Wrobel, Nucleon induced recoil ions in microelectronics, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technologyp. 339, April, Nice, France, 2007, pp. 23–27.

Chadwick, 1999, Cross-Section Evaluations to 150 MeV for Accelerator-Driven Systems and Implementation in MCNPX, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 131, 293, 10.13182/NSE98-48

Trkov, 2011, ENDF-6 formats manual: Data Formats and procedures for the evaluated nuclear data file ENDF/B-VI and ENDF/B-VII, Rev., 2

D. Rochman, TAFIS-1.0: Generation of fission yields, nu-bar and covariances, 2012, User manual, NRG unpublished.

D. Rochman, TARES-1.1: Generation of resonance data and their uncertainties, User manual, NRG unpublished, 2012.

A.J. Koning, Requirements for an Evaluated Nuclear Data File for Accelerator-Based Transmutation, NEA Data Bank Report NEA/NSC/DOC(93) 6, 1993.

A.J. Koning, A. Hogenbirk, High-energy nuclear data files: From ENDF-6 to NJOY to MCNP, NEA Data Bank Report NEA/NSC/DOC(97) 8, 1997.

A. Trkov, 2009, private communication. W evaluation.

D. Rochman, TANES-1.0: Generation of fission neutron spectra and their uncertainties, User manual, NRG unpublished, 2012.

J-Ch Sublet, A.J. Koning, R.A. Forrest, and J Kopecky The JEFF-3.0/A Neutron Activation File - New Features, Validation and Usage, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology - ND2004, AIP vol. 769, eds. R.C. Haight, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, and P. Talou, Sep. 26 - Oct. 1, 2004, Santa Fe, USA, p. 203 (2005).

Rochman, 2009, Uncertainties for criticality-safety benchmarks and keff distributions, Ann. Nucl. En., 36, 810, 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.01.018

Rochman, 2009, Uncertainties for criticality-safety benchmarks and consequences for nuclear data measurements, vol. 1175, 95

Rochman, 2010, Exact nuclear data uncertainty propagation for fusion neutronics calculations, Fus. Eng. Des., 85, 669, 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.03.034

Rochman, 2011, Exact nuclear data uncertainty propagation for fusion design, vol. 59, 1386

Rochman, 2011, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation for a sodium fast reactor, vol. 59, 1191

Rochman, 2011, Uncertainties for the kalimer sodium fast reactor: void coefficient, keff, βeff, burn-up and radiotoxicity, Jour. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 48, 1193, 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711807

Rochman, 2010, On the evaluation of 23 Na neutroninduced reactions and validations, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A, 612, 374, 10.1016/j.nima.2009.10.147

C. Gustavsson, S. Pomp, H. Sjostrand, G. Wallin, M. Osterlund, A. Koning, D. Rochman, K. Bejmer, H. Henriksson, Massive computation methodology for reactor operation (macro), in: Proceedings of the European Nuclear Conference (ENC 2010), Barcelona, Spain, June 2010, 30 May - 2.

Rochman, 2011, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation: Total Monte Carlo vs. covariance (invited presentation), vol. 59, 1236

Rochman, 2011, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation: Monte Carlo vs. perturbation, Ann. Nucl. En., 38, 942, 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.026

Rochman, 2010, Propagation of nuclear data uncertainty: Exact or with covariances, Eur. Phys. Jour. Web of Conferences, 8, 04003, 10.1051/epjconf/20100804003

Rochman, 2012, Propagation of 235,236,238U and 239Pu nuclear data uncertainties for a typical PWR fuel element, Nucl. Technology, 10.13182/NT11-61

Briesmeister, 2000

J. Leppanen, PSG2 / serpent - a continuous-energy Monte Carlo reactor physics burnup calculation code, tech. rep., VTT Technical Research, Centre of Finland, Finland, 2010, http://montecarlo.vtt.fi.

G. Marleau, R. Roy, A. Hébert, DRAGON: A collision probability transport code for cell and supercell calculations, tech. rep, Institut de génie nucléaire, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montral, Québec, 1994, Report IGE-157.

R. McFarlane, NJOY99 - code system for producing pointwise and multigroup neutron and photon cross sections from endf/b data, Tech. Rep. RSIC PSR-480, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2000.

Kahler, 2010, Methods for Processing ENDF/B-VII with NJOY, Nuclear Data Sheets, 111, 2739, 10.1016/j.nds.2010.11.001

Takeda, 1999, Estimation of error propagation in Monte Carlo burnup calculations, Jour. of Nucl. Sci. and Technol., 36, 738, 10.1080/18811248.1999.9726262

D. Rochman, C. Sciolla, Total Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation applied to the phase i-1 burnup calculation, (a report for the pin-cell physics of tmi-1 pwr unit cell of the oecd/uam working group), Tech. Rep. to be obtained, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), Petten, The Netherlands, 2012.

Bricks, 2004

Rochman, 2012, Improving the H in H2O thermal scattering data using the Petten method, Nucl. Sci. and Eng.

de Saint-Jean, 2011

D. Rochman, C. Sciolla, Total Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation applied to the phase i-1 burnup calculation, a report for the pin-cell physics of tmi-1 pwr unit cell of the oecd/uam working group, Tech. Rep. 113696, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), Petten, the Netherlands, ftp://ftp.nrg.eu/pub/www/talys/bib_rochman/tmc.nrg.pdf, 2012.

A. Takahashi, Integral neutronics experiments at OKTAVIAN, Tech. Rep. OK-TAVIAN Report B-83-01, 1983, http://www-nds.iaea.org/fendl2/validation/benchmarks/jaerim94014/oktavian/n-leak/.

Kodeli, 2005, Tech. Rep. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 116, 558, 10.1093/rpd/nci043

C. Wong, J. Anderson, P. Brown, L. Hansen, J. Kammerdiener, C. Logan, B. Pohl, Livermore pulsed sphere program: Program summary through july 1971, Tech. Rep. UCRL-51144, Rev. 1, Lawrence Livermore National laboratory, 1972.

Ivanov

Rochman, 2011, Evaluation and adjustment of the neutron-induced reactions of 63,65Cu, Nucl. Sci. and Eng., 170, 265, 10.13182/NSE11-37

R. Forrest, The european activation system: EASY-2001 overview, Tech. Rep. UKAEA FUS 449, UKAEA, Culham, UK, 2001.

Meulekamp, 2006, Calculating the Effective Delayed Neutron Fraction with Monte Carlo, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 152, 142, 10.13182/NSE03-107

Capote, 2008, An investigation of the performance of the Unified Monte Carlo method of neutron cross section data evaluation, Nucl. Data Sheets, 109, 2768, 10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.007

Capote, 2011, Unified Monte Carlo and Mixed Probability Functions, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 59, 1284, 10.3938/jkps.59.1284

Hogenbirk, 2007, An easy way to carry out 3d uncertainty analysis

Hogenbirk, 2010, A novel method to carry out uncertainty analyses for iter shielding calculations: a useful tool in engineering and design phase, 17

Y.O.K. Furuta, S. Kondo, Susd: A computer code for cross section sensitivity and uncertainty analysis including secondary neutron energy and angular distributions, tech. rep, University of Tokyo, 1986, report UTNL-R0185, Nucl. Eng. Res. Lab, NEA Data Bank package n. 1151.

E. Bauge, R. Capote, U. Fisher, M. Herman, T. Kawano, I. Kodeli, A. Koning, A. Konobeyev, H. Leeb, D. Neudecker, P. Obložinský, P. Pereslavtsev, M. Pigni, D. Rochman, D. Smith, P. Talou, A. Trkov, Covariance data in the fast neutron region, Tech. Rep. WPEC Subgroup 24 final report, OECD/NEA Nuclear Data Bank, Paris, France, 2010.

Capote, 2010, Nuclear data evaluation methodology including estimates of covariances, Eur. Phys. Jour., 8, 04001

Zwermann, 2011, Uncertainty analyses with nuclear covariance data in reactor core calculations, Jour. of Korean Phys. Soc., 59, 1256, 10.3938/jkps.59.1256

Buss

W. Wieselquist, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation in a lattice physics code using stochastic sampling, in: the proceedings of the PHYSOR-2012 Advances in Reactor Physics conference, Knoxville, TN, April 2012, pp. 15–20.

W. Zwermann, ”Uncertainty propagation for the fuel pin model based on the european sodium-cooled fast reactor”, Gesellschaft fuer Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH Forschungszentrum, Garching, Germany, private communication, (2011).

M.D. DeHart, M.C. Brady, C.V. Parks, OECD/NEA burnup credit calculational criticality benchmark phase 1-b results, Tech. Rep. NSCDOC(96)-06 and ORNL-6901, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1996.

O. Buss, Comparison of burn-up uncertainties in phase 1b benchmark, in: AREVA NP GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany, 2011, private communication.

Buss

O. Buss, A. Hoefer, J. -Ch Neuber, “NUDUNA - Nuclear Data Uncertainty Analysis”, ICNC 2011 Proceedings, Edinburgh, Sept. 2011.

Dossantos-Uzarralde, 2008, A polynomial chaos approach for nuclear data uncertainties evaluations, Nuclear Data Sheets, 109, 2894, 10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.030

Williams, 2012, Annals of Nucl. Energy

L. Gilli, Uncertainty propagation in criticality benchmarks using a non-intrusive polynomial chaos technique, Delft Technical University, private communication, 2012.

M.M. Williams, private communication, 2012.

S. van der Marck, A. Koning, D. Rochman, Photoproduction data for heating calculations, in: the proceedings of the International conference on the Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR-2008), Interlaken, Switzerland, September 2008, pp. 14–19.

M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, 1965, p. 940, Chapter 26, MR0167642, ISBN 978-0486612720.

Maslov, 2011, 235U(n,f) 233U(n,f) and 239Pu(n,f) prompt fission neutron spectra, Jour. Korean Phys. Soc., 59, 1337, 10.3938/jkps.59.1337

Zwermann, 2012, Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in sampling based nuclear data uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, 15