Models of electoral system change

Electoral Studies - Tập 23 Số 3 - Trang 363-389 - 2004
Kenneth Benoit1
1Department of Political Science, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ashley, 1990, Bulgaria, Electoral Studies, 9, 312, 10.1016/0261-3794(90)90016-2

Bates, 1988, Contra contractarianism: some reflections on the new institutionalism, Politics and Society, 16, 387, 10.1177/003232928801600207

Bates, 1998

Bawn, 1993, The logic of institutional preferences: German electoral law as a social choice outcome, American Journal of Political Science, 37, 965, 10.2307/2111539

Benoit, 1996, Hungary’s two-ballot electoral system, Representation, 33, 162, 10.1080/00344899608522977

Benoit, 2001, The endogeneity problem in electoral studies: a critical reexamination of Duverger’s mechanical effect, Electoral Studies, 20, 35

Benoit, K., Hayden, J. Institutional change and persistence: the evolution of Poland’s electoral system 1989–2001. Journal of Politics, in press.

Benoit, 2001, Institutional choice in new democracies: bargaining over Hungary’s 1989 electoral law, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13, 159, 10.1177/0951692801013002002

Blais, 1997, Electoral formulas: a macroscopic perspective, European Journal of Political Research, 32, 107, 10.1111/1475-6765.00334

Boix, 1999, Setting the rules of the game: the choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies, American Political Science Review, 93, 609, 10.2307/2585577

Brady, 1992, Electoral systems and institutional choice: a case study of the 1988 Korean elections, Comparative Political Studies, 24, 405, 10.1177/0010414092024004001

Carstairs, 1980

Cox, 1997

Dahl, 1973

Dunleavy, 1995, Understanding the dynamics of electoral reform, International Political Science Review, 16, 9, 10.1177/019251219501600102

Duverger, 1951

Duverger, 1984, Which is the best electoral system?

Elster, 1998

Engelbrekt, K., 1991. The Grand National Assembly to adopt a new constitution. RFE/RL Report on Eastern Europe, pp. 5–8 (April 19).

Frye, 1997, A politics of institutional choice: post-communist presidencies, Comparative Political Studies, 39, 523, 10.1177/0010414097030005001

Geddes, 1991, A game-theoretic model of reform in Latin American democracies, American Political Science Review, 85, 371, 10.2307/1963165

Geddes, 1996, Initiation of new democratic institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America, 14

Gelazis, N., 1995. Lithuanian elections to the Seimas. Unpublished paper.

Grumm, 1958, Theories of electoral systems, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 2, 357, 10.2307/2108721

Horowitz, 1985

Ishiyama, 1997, Transitional electoral systems in post-communist Eastern Europe, Political Science Quarterly, 112, 95, 10.2307/2658164

Jowitt, 1992

Kamiński, 1999, How communism could have been saved: formal analysis of electoral bargaining in Poland in 1989, Public Choice, 98, 83, 10.1023/A:1018343527571

Klíma, M., 2000. Electoral engineering and cartelization of politics in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of Political Science, Quebec City, Canada, August 1–5.

Knight, 1992

Knight, 1995, Models, interpretations, and theories: constructing explanations of institutional emergence and change

Knight, J., Sened, I. (Eds.), 1995. Explaining Social Institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Laver, 1990

Lijphart, 1992, Democratization and constitutional choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland 1989–91, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 4, 207, 10.1177/0951692892004002005

Lijphart, 1994

Lipson, 1964

Mackie, 1991

Magyar Hírlap, 1997. Az arányosítás a kis pártoknak kedvez [More proportionality would favor the small parties]. April 12, pp. 1, 5.

O’Donnell, 1986

O’Leary, 1975, Ireland: the north and south, 53

Olson, 1993, Political parties and party systems in regime transformation: inner transition in the new democracies of Central Europe, American Review of Politics, 14, 619, 10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.619-658

Preuss, 1996, The roundtable talks in the German Democratic Republic, 99

Remington, 1996, Political goals, institutional context and the choice of an electoral system: the Russian parliamentary election law, American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1253, 10.2307/2111750

Reynolds, 1997

Riker, 1980, Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions, American Political Science Review, 74, 423, 10.2307/1960638

Riker, 1982, The two-party system and Duverger’s law, an essay on the history of political science, American Political Science Review, 76, 753, 10.2307/1962968

Rogowski, 1987, Trade and the variety of democratic institutions, International Organization, 41, 203, 10.1017/S0020818300027442

Rokkan, 1970

Sait, 1938

Shamir, 1985, Changes in electoral systems as ‘interventions’: another test of Duverger’s hypothesis, European Journal of Political Research, 13, 1, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1985.tb00105.x

Shepsle, 1979, Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models, American Journal of Political Science, 23, 27, 10.2307/2110770

Shepsle, 1986, Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions

Shepsle, 1989, Studying institutions: some lessons from the rational choice approach, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 131, 10.1177/0951692889001002002

Shugart, 1992, Electoral reform in systems of proportional representation, European Journal of Political Research, 21, 207, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00295.x

Tsebelis, 1990