Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity

Bateman, 2002 Carson, 2007, Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 181, 10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5 Champ, 2006, Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format?, Land Economics, 82, 162, 10.3368/le.82.2.162 Eklöf, J.A., Karlsson, S., 1997. Testing and correcting for sample selection bias in discrete choice contingent valuation studies. In: SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No 171, Revised in 1999, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. Fishe, 1981, Labor force earnings and college choice of young women: an examination of selectivity bias and comparative advantage, Economics of Education Review, 1, 169, 10.1016/0272-7757(81)90043-1 Garcia, S., Harou, P., Montagné, C., Stenger, A., 2007. Valuing forest biodiversity from a national survey in France: a dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Cahier du LEF no 2007-08, 〈http://lef.nancy-engref.inra.fr/Docs/doc_LEF_n2007-08.pdf〉. Green, 1998, Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods, Resource and Energy Economics, 20, 85, 10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00031-6 Ham, 1982, Estimation of a labour supply model with censoring due to unemployment and underemployment, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 335, 10.2307/2297360 Heckman, 1976, The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependant variables and a simple estimator for such models, The Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475 Heckman, 1979, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47, 153, 10.2307/1912352 Herriges, 1996, Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 112, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008 Köhlin, 2001, Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: the case of social forestry in Orissa, India, Environment and Development Economics, 6, 237, 10.1017/S1355770X01000134 Lee, 1980, Asymptotic covariance matrices of two-stage probit and two-stage tobit methods for simultaneous equations models with selectivity, Econometrica, 48, 491, 10.2307/1911112 Peyron, J.-L., Harou, P., Niedzwiedz, A., Stenger, A., 2002. National survey on demand for recreation in French forests. Report for EUROSTAT, Nancy, France, 44pp. Poirier, 1980, Partial observability in bivariate probit models, Journal of Econometrics, 12, 209, 10.1016/0304-4076(80)90007-X Strazzera, 2003, The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites, Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 461, 10.1023/A:1025098431440 Strazzera, 2003, Modelling zero bids in contingent valuation surveys, Applied Economics, 35, 133, 10.1080/0003684022000015900 Tunali, 1986, A general structure for models of double-selection and an application to a joint migration/earnings process with remigration, vol. 8, Part B, 235 van de Ven, 1981, The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection, Journal of Econometrics, 17, 229, 10.1016/0304-4076(81)90028-2 Whitehead, 1993, Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation: analysis of a combination phone/mail survey, Economics Letters, 41, 215, 10.1016/0165-1765(93)90200-V Yoo, 2001, Application of sample selection model to double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 147, 10.1023/A:1012625929384