Modelling the Enablers of Agile Performance in Healthcare Organization: A TISM Approach

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management - Tập 18 Số 3 - Trang 251-272 - 2017
Rojalin Patri1, M. Suresh1
1Amrita School of Business, Amrita University, Coimbatore, 641 112, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agarwal, A., & Vrat, P. (2015). A TISM based bionic model of organizational excellence. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(4), 361–376.

Angst, C. M., Devaraj, S., & D’Arcy, J. (2012). Dual role of IT-assisted communication in patient care: A validated structure–process–outcome framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 257–292.

Aravind Raj, S., Sudheer, A., Vinodh, S., & Anand, G. (2013). A mathematical model to evaluate the role of agility enablers and criteria in a manufacturing environment. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5971–5984.

Aronsson, H., Abrahamsson, M., & Spens, K. (2011). Developing lean and agile health care supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 176–183.

Attri, R., Grover, S., Dev, N., & Kumar, D. (2013). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers in the implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 4(4), 313–326.

Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37–44.

Davies, B. M., & Drake, P. R. (2007). Strategies for achieving best value in commissioned home care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(3), 206–225.

Dubey, R., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 131–143.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Sushil, & Singh, T. (2015). Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 2(4), 231–247.

Gehani, R. R. (1995). Time-based management of technology: A taxonomic integration of tactical and strategic roles. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(2), 19–35.

Gunasekaran, A., Lai, K. H., & Cheng, T. E. (2008). Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega, 36(4), 549–564.

Guven-Uslu, P., Chan, H. K., Ijaz, S., Bak, O., Whitlow, B., & Kumar, V. (2014). In-depth study of ‘decoupling point’ as a reference model: An application for health service supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 25(13–14), 1107–1117.

Janes, F. R. (1988). Interpretive structural modelling: A methodology for structuring complex issues. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 10(3), 145–154.

Jayalakshmi, B., & Pramod, V. R. (2015). Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 63–85.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Khare, S. B. (2014). Assessment of elements of flowing stream strategy crystal: A study in the context of telecom service sector in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(4), 327–343.

Kidd, P. T. (1995). Agile manufacturing: Forging new frontiers. London: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

Kitzmiller, R., Hunt, E., & Sproat, S. B. (2006). Adopting best practices: “Agility” moves from software development to healthcare project management. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24(2), 75–82.

Krishnamurthy, R., & Yauch, C. A. (2007). Leagile manufacturing: A proposed corporate infrastructure. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), 588–604.

Mahajan, R., Agrawal, R., Sharma, V., & Nangia, V. (2016). Analysis of challenges for management education in India using total interpretive structural modelling. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 95–122.

Morgan, N. A., & Piercy, N. F. (1998). Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: Influences and outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 190–208.

Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 107–118.

Olsson, O., & Aronsson, H. (2015). Managing a variable acute patient flow—categorising the strategies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(2), 113–127.

Pipe, T. B., Buchda, V. L., Launder, S., Hudak, B., Hulvey, L., Karns, K. E., et al. (2012). Building personal and professional resources of resilience and agility in the healthcare workplace. Stress and Health, 28(1), 11–22.

Rahimnia, F., & Moghadasian, M. (2010). Supply chain leagility in professional services: How to apply decoupling point concept in healthcare delivery system. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 80–91.

Sanchez, L. M., & Nagi, R. (2001). A review of agile manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 39(16), 3561–3600.

Schollhammer, H. (1971). Organization structures of multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 14(3), 345–365.

Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460.

Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 171–188.

Sushil (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.

Sushil (2016). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Annals of Operations Research. doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3 .

Sushil (2017) Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning & Control. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1336794 .

Towill, D. R., & Christopher, M. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the architecture of effective healthcare delivery systems. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19(2), 130–147.

Venkatesh, V. G., Rathi, S., & Patwa, S. (2015). Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 26, 153–167.

Vignesh, V., & Suresh, M. (2016). Factors influencing lean practices in Super market services using interpretive structural modeling. In 2016 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

Vinodh, S., & Devadasan, S. R. (2011). Twenty criteria based agility assessment using fuzzy logic approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9), 1219–1231.

Vinodh, S., Kumar, V. U., & Girubha, R. J. (2012). Thirty-criteria-based agility assessment: A case study in an Indian pump manufacturing organisation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 63(9), 915–929.

Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 4(1), 81–87.

Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2016). Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 321–340.

Yadav, N., & Sushil, S. (2014). Total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of strategic performance management for Indian telecom service providers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(4), 421–445.

Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 33–43.