Modelling in Normative Ethics
Tóm tắt
This is a paper about the methodology of normative ethics. I claim that much work in normative ethics can be interpreted as modelling, the form of inquiry familiar from science, involving idealised representations. I begin with the anti-theory debate in ethics, and note that the debate utilises the vocabulary of scientific theories without recognising the role models play in science. I characterise modelling, and show that work with these characteristics is common in ethics. This establishing the plausibility of my interpretation. Taking methodological inspiration from modelling in science gives us new tools for managing idealisations, and a new perspective on pluralism. I think demonstrate why this interpretation is a fruitful way of interpreting ethics, by looking at three case studies. First, I return to the anti-theory debate and argue that modelling opens up a new middle ground. Second, I argue that a modelling lens offers a new way of understanding impossibility theorems in population ethics, and their bearing on ethics as a whole. Finally, I show how viewing our work as modelling can be deployed in debates within ethics, using the debate over prioritarianism as an example. I close with further methodological suggestions for those who choose to see themselves as modellers. I discuss the role of counterexamples, our responses to moral disagreement, and the training of new ethicists.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler MD, Hotug N (2019) Prioritarianism: a response to critics. Politics Philos Econ 18(2):101–144
Anscombe GEM (1958) Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33(124):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943
Arras J (2010) Theory and bioethics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/theory-bioethics/. Accessed 08 May 2021
Arrhenius G (2000) An impossibility theorem for welfarist axiologies. Econ Philos 16(2):247–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100000249
Arrhenius G (forthcoming) Population Ethics. Oxford University Press
Baier A (1985) Postures of the Mind. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Baier A (1989) Doing Without Moral Theory. In: Clarke SG, Simpson E (eds) Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. State University of New York, Albany, pp 29–49
Beck L, Jahn M (2021) Normative models and their success. Philos Soc Sci 51(2):123–150
Bovens L, Hartmann S (2003) Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Budolfson M, Spears D (2022) “Does the Repugnant Conclusion Have Important Implications for Axiology or for Public Policy?” In: Oxford Handbook of Population Ethics, edited by Tim Campbell, Krister Bykvist, and Gustaf Arrhenius. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cartwright N (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press
Cartwright N (1989) Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press
Cartwright N (1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chappell S-G (2022) “If Not Moral Theory, Then What?” In Epiphanies, 49–110. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858016.001.0001
Clarke SG (1987) Anti-theory in ethics. Am Philos Q 24(3):237–244
Dancy J (2017) Moral particularism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/moral-particularism/. Accessed 26 Sept 2020
Eva B, Hartmann S (2020) On the origins of old evidence. Australas J Philos 98(3):481–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1658210
Fotion N (2014) Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived Conflict. Oxford University Press
Frigg R, Hartmann S (2018) “Models in Science.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Glymour CN (1999) “Realism and the Nature of Theories.” In: Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, edited by Merrilee H. Salmon. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett
Godfrey-Smith P (2006) Theories and models in metaphysics. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 14(1):4–19
Godfrey-Smith P (2012) Metaphysics and the philosophical imagination. Philos Stud 160(1):97–113
Hancox-Li L (2017) Idealization and abstraction in models of injustice. Hypatia 32(2):329–346
Hempel CG (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Foundations of Philosophy. Prentice Hall, London
Leitgeb H (2013) Scientific philosophy, mathematical philosophy, and all that. Metaphilosophy 44(3):267–275
List C, Valentini L (2016) The methodology of political theory. In: Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/PDF-files/MethodologyPoliticalTheory.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2020
Louden RB (1990) Virtue ethics and anti-theory. Philosophia 20(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382586
Louden RB (1992) Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation. Oxford University Press, New York
McCarthy D, Mikkola K, Thomas T (2019) Aggregation for potentially infinite populations without continuity or completeness. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00872. Accessed 24 Sept 2020
McKeever S, Ridge M (2015) Obvious Objections. Oxford University Press
Morgan MS, Morrison M (eds) (1999) Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Novick A (2017) Metaphysics and the vera causa ideal: the nun’s priest’s tale. Erkenntnis 82(5):1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9863-1
Nozick R (1981) Philosophical Explanations. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Nussbaum M (2000) “Why Practice Needs Ethical Theory.” In: Moral Particularism, edited by Brad Hooker and Margaret Olivia Little, 234–345. Clarendon Press, Oxford
O’Neill O (1987) “Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics.” In: Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, edited by J. D. G. Evans, 55–69. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Otsuka M, Voorhoeve A (2018) Equality versus priority. In: Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/OTSUKAM/M. Accessed 25 Sept 2020
Parfit D (1984) Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Parfit D (2002) Equality or Priority? In: Clayton M, Williams A (eds) The Ideal of Equality. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 81–125
Paul LA (2012) Metaphysics as modeling: the Handmaiden’s tale. Philos Stud 160(1):1–29
Potochnik A (2017) Idealization and the Aims of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Raphael DD (1974) The standard of morals: the presidential address. Proc Aristot Soc 75:1–12
Reutlinger A, Schurz G, Hüttemann A, Jaag S (2019) Ceteris paribus laws. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/ceteris-paribus/. Accessed 26 Sept 2020
Roussos J (forthcoming) Normative formal epistemology as modelling. Br J Philos Sci. https://doi.org/10.1086/718493
Suppes P (1969) A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Science. In: Suppes P (ed) Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 10–23
Teller P (2001) Twilight of the perfect model model. Erkenntnis 55(3):393–415
Timmons M (2012) Moral Theory: An Introduction. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham
Titelbaum MG (forthcoming) “Normative Modelling.” In: Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Contemporary Reader, edited by J. Horvath. The PhilPapers Foundation
Weisberg M (2007a) Three kinds of idealization. J Philos 104(12):639–659
Weisberg M (2007b) Who Is a modeler? Br J Philos Sci 58(2):207–233
Williams B (1981) Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165860
Williams B (1973) “Critique of Utilitarianism.” In: Utilitarianism: For and Against, edited by Bernard Williams and J. J. C. Smart. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williamson T (2018) Model-Building as a philosophical method. Phenomenol Mind 15(15):16–22. https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-24968
Williamson T (2006) “Must Do Better.” In: Truth and Realism, edited by Patrick Greenough and Michael P. Lynch, 177–88. Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, Oxford: New York
Williamson T (2017) “Model-Building in Philosophy.” In: Philosophy’s Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress, edited by Russell Blackford and Damien Broderick. Wiley, Oxford
Wimsatt WC (2007) Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Harvard University Press, Cambridge