Modeling the Pathways to Self-Confidence for Graduate School in Computing
Tóm tắt
Given the significant need to increase and diversify graduate enrollments within computing fields, it is vital to understand what shapes students’ pathways to computing graduate school. This study examines the predictors of undergraduate students’ self-confidence in being admitted to computing graduate school among students who enrolled in an introductory computing course during the 2015–2016 academic year and completed both an end-of-intro-course survey as well as a follow-up survey two years later. Guided by social cognitive career theory, this longitudinal and multi-institutional study uses structural equation modeling to illustrate the direct and indirect relationships between students’ social identities (specifically gender and race/ethnicity), psychosocial beliefs, perceptions of support, and self-confidence for computing graduate admission. Findings suggest that gender and racial/ethnic inequities in self-confidence for graduate admission are present during introductory computing courses, and women’s early perceptions in intro courses (e.g., math self-concept) seem to play an especially vital role in explaining why women ultimately report lower self-confidence for computing graduate admission than men. Findings also highlight the key mediating role of computing self-efficacy in cultivating students’ self-confidence for computing graduate admission. Taken together, these results have important implications for understanding intro computing students’ perceptions about their graduate school trajectories and how to foster a more diverse graduate applicant pool.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alliance for California Computing Education for Students and Schools (n.d.). About ACCESS. https://access-ca.org/about.
Alsharani, A., Ross, I., & Wood, M. I. (2018). Using social cognitive career theory to understand why students choose to study computer science. In Proceedings of the ACM ICER Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 205–214).
Babeş-Vroman, M., Tjang, A., & Nguyen, T. (2018). Examining race/ethnicity diversity in the enrollment of a 4-year CS university program (Technical Report). https://doi.org/10.7282/T3QN69ZQ.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H Freeman and Company.
Bentler, P. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317–335). Plenum.
Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women so underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363.
Blaney, J. M., & Stout, J. G. (2017). Examining the relationship between introductory computing course experiences, self-efficacy, and belonging among first-generation college women. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’17) (pp. 69–74).
Byars-Winston, A. M., & Fouad, N. A. (2008). Math and science social cognitive variables in college students: Contributions of contextual factors in predicting goals. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(4), 425–440.
Charleston, L. J. (2012). A qualitative investigation of African Americans' decision to pursue computing science degrees: Implications for cultivating career choice and aspiration. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(4), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028918.
Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 2(1), vii–xvi.
Cohoon, J. M., & Lord, H. (2007). Women’s entry to graduate study in computer science and computer engineering in the United States. In C. J. Burger, E. G. Creamer, & P. S. Meszaros (Eds.), Reconfiguring the firewall: Recruiting women to information technology across cultures and continents (pp. 147–160). AK Peters, Ltd.
Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2011). The postbaccalaureate goals of college women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 51–58.
Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 541–554.
Cuny, J., & Aspray, W. (2002). Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: Results of a workshop organized by the Computing Research Association. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 168–174.
Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A., Herrera, F. A., & Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683–713.
English, D., & Umbach, P. D. (2016). Graduate school choice: An examination of individual and institutional effects. The Review of Higher Education, 39(2), 173–211.
Flaherty, C. (2018, May 9). System crash. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/09/no-clear-solution-nationwide-shortage-computer-science-professors.
Hambrusch, S., Libeskind-Hadas, R., & Aaron, E. (2015). Understanding the U.S. domestic computer science Ph.D. pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 58(5), 29–32.
Herrera, F. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. (2011, November 17–19). Maintaining career aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) among college students [Paper presentation]. Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting, Charlotte, NC, USA
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Kapoor, A., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2018). Understanding professional identities and goals of computer science undergraduate students. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’18) (pp. 191–196).
Kurose, J. (2017, July 3). Dear colleague letter: Pursuing meaningful actions in support of broadening participation in computing (BPC) (NSF Publication No. 17-110). National Science Foundation. https://nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17110/nsf17110.pdf.
Kyoung Ro, H., Lattuca, L. R., & Alcott, B. (2017). Who goes to graduate school? Engineers' math proficiency, college experience, and self-assessment of skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 98–122.
Langin, K. (2019, May 29). A wave of graduate programs drops the GRE application requirement. Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2019/05/wave-graduate-programs-drop-gre-application-requirement.
Lehman, K. J., Wofford, A. M., Sendowski, M., Newhouse, K. N. S., & Sax, L. J. (2020). Better late than never: Exploring students’ pathways to computing in later stages of college. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’20) (pp. 1075–1081). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366814.
Lent, R. W. (2016). Self-efficacy in a relational world: Social cognitive mechanisms of adaptation and development. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 573–594.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 255–311). Jossey-Bass.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 265–269.
Lent, R. W., Lopez, A. M., Jr., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 52–62.
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Sheu, H. B., & Lopez, A. M., Jr. (2011). Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 184–192.
Litzler, E., Samuelson, C. C., & Lorah, J. A. (2014). Breaking it down: Engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Research in Higher Education, 55(8), 810–832.
Malcom, L. E., & Dowd, A. C. (2012). The impact of undergraduate debt on the graduate school enrollment of STEM baccalaureates. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 265–305.
Mandel, T., & Mache, J. (2017). Examining PhD student interest in teaching: An analysis of 19 years of historical data. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’17) (pp. 713). https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022427.
Manly, C. A., & Wells, R. S. (2015). Reporting the use of multiple imputation for missing data in higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 397–409.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT Press.
Merolla, D. M., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: The role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 575–597.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed). Muthén & Muthén.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. The National Academies Press.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). The science of effective mentorship in STEMM. The National Academies Press.
Payton, J., & Souvenir, R. (2016). Broadening participation: Meeting the need for diverse faculty. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 48(1), 10.
Perna, L. (2004). Understanding the decision to enroll in graduate school: Sex and racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(5), 487–527.
Poon, O., Squire, D., Kodama, C., Byrd, A., Chan, J., Manzano, L., Furr, S., & Bishundat, D. (2016). A critical review of the model minority myth in selected literature on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 469–502.
Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476.
Rocconi, L. M., Ribera, A. K., & Nelson Laird, T. F. (2015). College seniors' plans for graduate school: Do deep approaches learning and Holland academic environments matter? Research in Higher Education, 56, 178–201.
Rodriguez, S. L., & Lehman, K. (2018). Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: The need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 229–247.
Rorrer, A. S., Allen, J., & Zuo, H. (2018). A national study of undergraduate research experiences in computing: Implications for culturally relevant pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium in Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’18) (pp. 604–609).
Rottinghaus, P. J., Lindley, L. D., Green, M. A., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Educational aspirations: The contribution of personality, self-efficacy, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 1–19.
Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2006). Understanding academic confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), 29–42.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage.
Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153–172.
Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 813–842.
Sax, L. J., & Newhouse, K. N. S. (2019). Disciplinary field specificity and variation in the STEM gender gap. New Directions for Institutional Research, 179, 45–71.
Sax, L. J., George, K. L., Wofford, A. M., & Sundar, S. (2019). The tech trajectory: Examining the role of college environments in enhancing a diverse pipeline to computing careers [Paper presentation]. Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, United States.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147.
Singer, N. (2019, January 24). The hard part of computer science? Getting into class. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/24/technology/computer-science-courses-college.html.
Strayhorn, T. L. (2010). Undergraduate research participation and STEM graduate degree aspirations among students of color. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 85–93.
Sullivan, P., Simmons, M., Moore, K., Meloncon, L., & Potts, L. (2015). Intentionally recursive: A participatory model for mentoring. Proceedings of the ACM SIGDOC International Conference on the Design of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2814672.
Szelényi, K., & Inkelas, K. (2011). The role of living-learning programs in women’s plans to attend graduate school in STEM fields. Research in Higher Education, 52(4), 349–369.
Tamer, B., & Stout, J. G. (2016a). Understanding how research experiences for undergraduate students may foster diversity in the professorate. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’16) (pp. 114–119).
Tamer, B., & Stout, J. G. (2016b). Recruitment and retention of undergraduate students in computing: Patterns by gender and race/ethnicity. https://cra.org/cerp/research-findings/.
Trytten, D. A., Lowe, A. W., & Walden, S. E. (2012). “Asians are good at math. What an awful stereotype”: The model minority stereotype’s impact on Asian American engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 439–468.
Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03.
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In J. A. Schinka, W. F. Velicer, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (pp. 661–690). Wiley.
Wilson, B. C., & Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’01) (pp. 184–188). https://doi.org/10.1145/364447.364581.
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237.
Wofford, A. M. (2019). Enhancing support and self-confidence for graduate school admission: Early findings from the computing field. NAGAP Perspectives, 31(2), 23–27.
Xu, Y. J. (2016). Aspirations and application for graduate education: Gender differences in low participation STEM disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 57(8), 913–942.
Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2018). 2017 CRA Taulbee survey: Another year of record undergrad enrollment; doctoral degree production steady while master’s production rises again. Computing Research Association. https://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2017-Taulbee-Survey-Report.pdf.