Modeling of machine learning with SHAP approach for electric vehicle charging station choice behavior prediction

Travel Behaviour and Society - Tập 31 - Trang 78-92 - 2023
Irfan Ullah1,2, Kai Liu1, Toshiyuki Yamamoto3, Muhammad Zahid4, Arshad Jamal5
1School of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2Department of Business and Administration, ILMA University, Pakistan
3Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
4Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada
5Transportation and Traffic Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adornato, 2009, Characterizing naturalistic driving patterns for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle analysis, 655 Ai, 2018, Household EV charging demand prediction using machine and ensemble learning, 163 Ao, 2019, The linear random forest algorithm and its advantages in machine learning assisted logging regression modeling, J. Petroleum Sci. Eng., 174, 776, 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.067 Azadfar, 2015, The investigation of the major factors influencing plug-in electric vehicle driving patterns and charging behaviour, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 42, 1065, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.058 Bas, 2021, An interpretable machine learning approach to understanding the impacts of attitudinal and ridesourcing factors on electric vehicle adoption, Transportation Lett., 1 Berdichevsky G, Kelty K, Straubel JB, Toomre E. The Tesla Roadster Battery System Tesla Motors. Recuperado de: Http://Large Stanford Edu/Publications/Coal/References/Docs/Tesla Pdf 2006. Chakraborty, 2022, Integrating plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) into household fleets-factors influencing miles traveled by PEV owners in California, Travel Behav. Soc., 26, 67, 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.004 Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2016, p. 785–94. Chung, 2019, Ensemble machine learning-based algorithm for electric vehicle user behavior prediction, Appl. Energy, 254, 113732, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113732 De Sousa L, Silvestre B, Bouchez B. A combined multiphase electric drive and fast battery charger for electric vehicles. 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, IEEE; 2010, p. 1–6. Du, 2019, Techniques for interpretable machine learning, Commun. ACM, 63, 68, 10.1145/3359786 ElMenshawy, 2020, Modular Isolated DC-DC Converters for Ultra-Fast EV Chargers: A Generalized Modeling and Control Approach, Energies, 13, 2540, 10.3390/en13102540 ElMenshawy, 2020, Hybrid Multimodule DC-DC Converters for Ultrafast Electric Vehicle Chargers, Energies, 13, 4949, 10.3390/en13184949 Franke, 2013, Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users, Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 21, 75, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.002 Frendo, 2020, Data-driven smart charging for heterogeneous electric vehicle fleets, Energy and AI, 1, 100007, 10.1016/j.egyai.2020.100007 Harrington, 2012 Ijaz, 2021, A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for injury severity prediction of crashes involving three-wheeled motorized rickshaw, Accid. Anal. Prev., 154, 106094, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106094 Kashifi, 2022, Predicting the travel mode choice with interpretable machine learning techniques: A comparative study, Travel Behav. Soc., 29, 279, 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.07.003 Liao, 2017, Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review, Transp. Rev., 37, 252, 10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794 Liu, 2021, Optimal charging strategy for large-scale electric buses considering resource constraints, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 99, 103009, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103009 Liu, 2022, Robust charging strategies for electric bus fleets under energy consumption uncertainty, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 104, 103215, 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103215 Lu, 2018, The application of improved random forest algorithm on the prediction of electric vehicle charging load, Energies, 11, 3207, 10.3390/en11113207 Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems, 2017, p. 4768–77. Majidpour M, Qiu C, Chu P, Gadh R, Pota HR. A novel forecasting algorithm for electric vehicle charging stations. 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), IEEE; 2014, p. 1035–40. Molnar, 2020 Pan, 2019, Modeling EV charging choice considering risk attitudes and attribute non-attendance, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 102, 60, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.007 Rahman, 2016, Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 58, 1039, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353 Rawson, 1999, Electric vehicle charging equipment design and health and safety codes, SAE Trans., 3256 San Román, 2011, Regulatory framework and business models for charging plug-in electric vehicles: Infrastructure, agents, and commercial relationships, Energy Policy, 39, 6360, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.037 Shibl, 2021, Electric Vehicles Charging Management Using Machine Learning Considering Fast Charging and Vehicle-to-Grid Operation, Energies, 14, 6199, 10.3390/en14196199 Sideris, 2019, Using random forests on real-world city data for urban planning in a visual semantic decision support system, Sensors, 19, 2266, 10.3390/s19102266 Soui, 2021, NSGA-II as feature selection technique and AdaBoost classifier for COVID-19 prediction using patient’s symptoms, Nonlinear Dyn., 106, 1453, 10.1007/s11071-021-06504-1 Sun, 2016, Fast-charging station choice behavior among battery electric vehicle users, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 46, 26, 10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.008 Thomas, 2009, Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, 6005, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.003 Tien Bui, 2019, A hybrid computational intelligence approach to groundwater spring potential mapping, Water, 11, 2013, 10.3390/w11102013 Turan, 2022, Ensemble learning algorithms, J. Sci. Arts, 22, 459, 10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-22.2-a18 Ullah I, Liu K, Yamamoto T, Zahid M, Jamal A. Prediction of electric vehicle charging duration time using ensemble machine learning algorithm and Shapley additive explanations. International Journal of Energy Research n.d. Ullah, 2021, Electric vehicle energy consumption prediction using stacked generalization: an ensemble learning approach, Int. J. Green Energy, 18, 896, 10.1080/15435075.2021.1881902 Ullah, 2022, A comparative performance of machine learning algorithm to predict electric vehicles energy consumption: A path towards sustainability, Energy Environ., 33, 1583, 10.1177/0958305X211044998 Ullah, 2022, Grey wolf optimizer-based machine learning algorithm to predict electric vehicle charging duration time, Transportation Letters, 1, 10.1080/19427867.2022.2111902 van Heuveln, 2021, Factors influencing consumer acceptance of vehicle-to-grid by electric vehicle drivers in the Netherlands, Travel Behav. Soc., 24, 34, 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.008 Walsh, 2019, Regularized linear and gradient boosted ensemble methods to predict athletes’ gender based on a survey of masters athletes, Model Assisted Stat. Appl., 14, 47 Wang, 2011, Study on siting and sizing of battery-switch station, 657 Weng, 2015, Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality, Accid. Anal. Prev., 76, 92, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.002 Westin, 2018, The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, geographic setting, and attitudes for adoption of electric vehicles in Sweden, Travel Behav. Soc., 13, 118, 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.07.004 Xiong, 2017, Distributed optimal vehicle grid integration strategy with user behavior prediction, 1 Xu, 2017 Xu, 2017, Joint charging mode and location choice model for battery electric vehicle users, Transp. Res. B Methodol., 103, 68, 10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.004 Yang, 2021, The application of XGBoost and SHAP to examining the factors in freight truck-related crashes: An exploratory analysis, Accid. Anal. Prev., 158, 106153, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106153 Yang, 2016, Modeling the charging and route choice behavior of BEV drivers, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 65, 190, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.09.008 Yang, 2020, Research on factors that influence the fast charging behavior of private battery electric vehicles, Sustainability, 12, 3439, 10.3390/su12083439 Youn, 2009, Class dependent feature scaling method using naive Bayes classifier for text datamining, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 30, 477, 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.11.013 Zhao, 2020, Prediction and behavioral analysis of travel mode choice: A comparison of machine learning and logit models, Travel Behav. Soc., 20, 22, 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.02.003 Zhu, 2021, Application of machine learning techniques for predicting the consequences of construction accidents in China, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 145, 293, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.006 Zoepf, 2013, Charging choices and fuel displacement in a large-scale demonstration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, Transp. Res. Rec., 2385, 1, 10.3141/2385-01