Mô hình hóa quá trình vận chuyển chất hòa tan từ các nhà máy nhiệt điện đến lớp biên khí quyển

A. A. Issakhov1,2, A. R. Baitureyeva1
1Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
2Kazakh British Technical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Tóm tắt

Hiện nay, có xu hướng gia tăng số lượng nhà máy nhiệt điện (NMD); xu hướng này có thể liên quan đến sự phát triển công nghiệp và sự gia tăng tiêu thụ năng lượng. Bài báo này thảo luận về mô phỏng số quá trình di chuyển ô nhiễm từ hoạt động của NMD và nghiên cứu mức độ tập trung ô nhiễm ở các khoảng cách khác nhau từ nguồn phát thải trong điều kiện khí quyển thực tế. Việc kiểm nghiệm thuật toán số và mô hình toán học được thực hiện thông qua các bài toán thử nghiệm 2D và 3D. Các giá trị tính toán thu được đã được so sánh với các giá trị đo thực tế và các giá trị tính toán của các tác giả khác. Ngoài ra, việc phân bố ô nhiễm trong trường hợp 3D đã được nghiên cứu trên một kích thước vật lý thực tế. Nhà máy nhiệt điện đốt than Ekibastuz TPP-1 đã được lấy làm ví dụ thực tế. Một đặc điểm nổi bật của NMD này là ô nhiễm được phát thải từ hai ống khói có chiều cao khác nhau ($$H_{H} = 330$$ và $$H_{L} = 300$$ m). Các giá trị thu được cho thấy rằng, do sự khác biệt về chiều cao của ống khói ($$H_{H} - H_{L} = 30$$ m), nồng độ ô nhiễm từ ống khói cao hơn ($$H_{H} = 330$$ m) giảm xuống xa hơn từ nguồn phát thải so với ống khói thấp hơn ($$H_{L} = 300$$ m) (2160 và 1970 m, tương ứng). Từ các dữ liệu thu được từ việc tính toán, có thể khẳng định rằng việc xây dựng các ống khói cao hơn làm giảm tác động có hại của khí thải đối với môi trường. Ngoài ra, các kết quả thu được sẽ giúp dự đoán khoảng cách an toàn và tối ưu từ các thành phố hoặc khu dân cư trong quá trình xây dựng các nhà máy nhiệt điện mới.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbaspour M, Javid AH, Moghimi P, Kayhan K (2005) Modeling of thermal pollution in coastal area and its economical and environmental assessment. Int J Environ Sci Tech 2(1):13–26 Acharya S, Tyagi M, Hoda A (2001) Flow and heat transfer predictions for film-cooling. Ann NY Acad Sci 934:110–125 Ajersch P, Zhou JM, Ketler S, Salcudean M, Gartshore IS (1995) Multiple jets in a crossflow: detailed measurements and numerical simulations. In: International gas turbine and aeroengine congress and exposition, ASME Paper 95-GT-9, Houston, TX, pp 1–16 Annual report. SAMRYK ENERGY (2015) https://www.samruk-energy.kz/en/shareholder/annual-reports Barbero R, Cuadra D, Domingo J, Iranzo A, Gallego E (2015) Investigation of the near-range dispersion of particles unexpectedly released from a nuclear power plant using CFD. Environ Fluid Mech 15(1):67–83 Camussi R, Guj G, Stella A (2002) Experimental study of a jet in a crossflow at very low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 454:113–144 Chai X, Iyer PS, Mahesh K (2015) Numerical study of high speed jets in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 785:152–188 Chang C-H, Chan C-C, Cheng K-J, Lin J-S (2011) Computational fluid dynamics simulation of air exhaust dispersion from negative isolation wards of hospitals. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 5(2):276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015370 Chochua G, Shyy W, Thakur S, Brankovic A, Lienau K, Porter L, Lischinsky D (2000) A computational and experimental investigation of turbulent jet and crossflow interaction. Numer Heat Transf A 38:557–572 Ebrahimi M, Jahangirian A (2013) New analytical formulations for calculation of dispersion parameters of Gaussian model using parallel CFD. Environ Fluid Mech 13(2):125–144 El-Sharkawi MA (2013) Electric energy—an introduction, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 53 Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants. International Finance Corporation (2017). https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-atifc/policies-standards/ehs-guidelines Falconi CJ, Denev JA, Frohlich J, Bockhorn H (2007) A test case for microreactor flows—a two-dimensional jet in crossflow with chemical reaction. Internal report. available at: http://www.ict.uni-karlsruhe.de/index.pl/themen/dns/index.html: “2d test case for microreactor flows. Internal report. 2007 July 20 Fatehifar E, Elkamel A, Alizadeh Osalu A, Charchi A (2008) Developing a new model for simulation of pollution dispersion from a network of stacks. Appl Math Comput 206:662–668 Fay JA, Rosenzweig JJ (1980) An analytical diffusion model for long distance transport of air pollutants. Atmos Environ 14(3):355–365 Ferziger JH, Peric M (2013) Computational methods for fluid dynamics, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 426 Gousseau P, Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Van Heijst GJF (2011) CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: a case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmos Environ 45(2):428–438 Grazia G, Sara F, Barbara A, Giorgio V, Alessandro B, Sergio T (2017) Impact assessment of pollutant emissions in the atmosphere from a power plant over a complex terrain and under unsteady winds. Sustainability 9:2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112076 Hasselbrink EF, Mungal MG (2001) Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 1. Scaling laws for strong transverse jets. J Fluid Mech 443:1–25 Igbokwe JO, Azubuike JO, Nwufo OC, Okafor G, Ezurike BO, Opara UV (2016) Critical review and analysis of general pollutants associated with thermal power plants in nigeria and control techniques. Res Rev J Eng Technol 5(4):1–4 Issakhov A (2014) Modeling of synthetic turbulence generation in boundary layer by using zonal RANS/LES method. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 15(2):115–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2012-0029 Issakhov A (2015a) Mathematical modeling of the discharged heat water effect on the aquatic environment from thermal power plant. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 16(5):229–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2015-0047 Issakhov A (2015b) Numerical modeling of the effect of discharged hot water on the aquatic environment from a thermal power plant. Int J Energy Clean Environ 16(1–4):23–28. https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2016015438 Issakhov A (2016a) Mathematical modeling of the discharged heat water effect on the aquatic environment from thermal power plant under various operational capacities. Appl Math Model 40(2):1082–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.024 Issakhov A (2016) Mathematical modelling of the thermal process in the aquatic environment with considering the hydrometeorological condition at the reservoir-cooler by using parallel technologies. In: Sustaining power resources through energy optimization and engineering, pp 1–494. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9755-3 Chapter 10, pp 227–243. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9755-3.ch010 Issakhov A (2017a) Numerical study of the discharged heat water effect on the aquatic environment from thermal power plant by using two water discharged pipes. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18(6):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2016-0011 Issakhov A (2017) Numerical modelling of the thermal effects on the aquatic environment from the thermal power plant by using two water discharge pipes. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1863, p 560050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4992733 Issakhov A, Mashenkova A (2019) Numerical study for the assessment of pollutant dispersion from a thermal power plant under the different temperature regimes. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02211-y Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y, Nogaeva A (2018) Numerical simulation of dam break flow for various forms of the obstacle by VOF method. Int J Multiph Flow 109:191–206 Issakhov A, Bulgakov R, Zhandaulet Y (2019) Numerical simulation of the dynamics of particle motion with different sizes. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 13(1):1–25 Keimasi MR, Taeibi-Rahni M (2001) Numerical simulation of jets in a crossflow using different turbulence models. AIAA J 39(12):2268 Kelso RM, Lim TT, Perry AE (1996) An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 306:111–144 Kho WLF, Sentian J, Radojevi M, Tan CL, Law PL, Halipah S (2007) Computer simulated versus observed NO2 and SO2 emitted from elevated point source complex. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4(2):215–222 Kozic MS (2015) A numerical study for the assessment of pollutant dispersion from Kostolac b power plant to Viminacium for different atmospheric conditions. Therm Sci 19(2):425–434 Livescu D, Jaberi FA, Madnia CK (2000) Passive-scalar wake behind a line source in grid turbulence. J Fluid Mech 416:117–149 Muppidi S, Mahesh K (2005) Study of trajectories of jets in crossflow using direct numerical simulations. J Fluid Mech 530:81–100 Muppidi S, Mahesh K (2007) Direct numerical simulation of round turbulent jets in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 574:59–84 Muppidi S, Mahesh K (2008) Direct numerical simulation of passive scalar transport in transverse jets. J Fluid Mech 598:335–360 Olaguer EP, Knipping E, Shaw S, Ravindran S (2016) Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1184194 Olivera A, Monterob G, Montenegrob R, Rodrguezb E, Escobarb JM, Perez-Fogueta A (2013) Adaptive finite element simulation of stack pollutant emissions over complex terrains. Exergy Int J 49:47–60 Saeed M, Yu J-Y, Abdalla AAA, Zhong X-P, Ghazanfar MA (2017) An assessment of k-e turbulence models for gas distribution analysis. Nucl Sci Tech 28:146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0304-x Sanín N, Montero G (2007) A finite difference model for air pollution simulation. Adv Eng Softw 38:358–365 Schluter JU, Schonfeld T (2000) LES of jets in crossflow and its application to a gas turbine burner. Flow Turbul Combust 65:177–203 Schonauer W, Adolph T (2005) Results of the snuffle problem Denev by the FDEM Program, Abschlussbericht des Verbundprojekts FDEM, UniversitЁat Karlsruhe Shan JW, Dimotakis PE (2006) Reynolds-number effects and anisotropy in transverse-jet mixing. J Fluid Mech 566:47–96 Su LK, Mungal MG (2004) Simultaneous measurement of scalar and velocity field evolution in turbulent crossflowing jets. J Fluid Mech 513:1–45 Toja-Silva F, Chen J, Hachinger S, Hase F (2017) CFD simulation of CO2 dispersion from urban thermal power plant: analysis of turbulent Schmidt number and comparison with Gaussian plume model and measurements. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 169:177–193 Tomiyama H, Kobayashi S, Tanabe K, Chatani S, Takami A (2016) Temporal emission distribution corresponding to operating quantity in thermal power plant. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 51(2):124–131 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Clean Air Markets Division: https://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/ Walvekar PP, Gurjar BR (2013) Formulation, application and evaluation of a stack emission model for coal-based power stations. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10(6):1235–1244 WHO (2002) The world health report 2002—reducing risks, promoting healthy life. http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/ Zavila O (2012) Physical Modeling of gas pollutant motion in the atmosphere. Adv Model Fluid Dyn. Dr. Chaoqun Liu (Ed.), InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/48405