Modeling Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Participatory Multi-risk Assessment on a Deltaic Environment Under Climate Change Conditions

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 28 Số 3 - Trang 367-388 - 2023
Margarita Katirtzidou1, Charalampos Skoulikaris2, Christos Makris3, Vasilis N. Baltikas3, Dionysis Latinopoulos1, Yannis Ν. Krestenitis3
1School of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
2Division of Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
3Laboratory of Maritime Engineering & Maritime Works, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Modern concepts in water resources management and related risk assessment necessitate participatory approaches with stakeholders having a key role in the respective processes. The objective of the article is to (i) integrate stakeholders’ opinions and preferences on identified hazards, i.e., coastal flooding, water scarcity, and heat stress, derived by physically based numerical modeling under current and future climate change conditions and attributed in the form of an Integrated deltaic risk index (IDRI) at a specific case study area, and (ii) investigate whether and how the stakeholders’ opinions differentiate the initial outputs coming from the mathematical models. Doing so, stakeholders’ mapping was conducted in tandem with interviews for the detection of responsibilities, tasks, importance, and influence, followed by a structured questionnaire for registering the stakeholders’ perception on climate change impacts and relevant estimated hazards at the same deltaic case study area. Thereafter, a stakeholder-based risk assessment model was constructed based on two methods: (a) stakeholders’ opinion and answers about the impact of each identified hazard are equally taken into consideration, and (b) stakeholders are divided into groups and evaluated through multi-criteria analysis. Finally, the produced weights by the two methods are appropriately coupled with the identified hazards and resulted in the development of a Stakeholder Participatory multi-Risk Index (SPmRI) per method. The comparison of the produced SPmRIs with the IDRI, which was formulated without considering any stakeholders’ participation, reveals noticeable differentiation of modeled outputs especially in cases of high index values, corroborating the need for stakeholders’ opinion inclusion through the SPmRI approach. The proposed methodology fosters the interaction of stakeholders’ perception with modeling-based hazard assessment as a modern tool for decision-making processes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ganoulis, J. (2004). Integrated risk analysis for sustainable water resources management. In: Linkov I., Ramadan A. B. (Eds) Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_17

Simonovic, S. I. (1996). Decision support systems for sustainable management of water resources: 1. General principles. Water International, 21(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508069608686519

Flint, R. W. (2004). The sustainable development of water resources. Water resources update, 127, 48–59.

Loucks, D. P. (2000). Sustainable water resources management. Water international, 25(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060008686793

Koudstaal, R., Rijsberman, F. R., & Savenije, H. (1992, November). Water and sustainable development. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 277–290). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Biswas, A. K. (2004). Integrated water resources management: A reassessment: A water forum contribution. Water international, 29(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060408691775

Benson, D., Gain, A. K., & Giupponi, C. (2020). Moving beyond water centricity? Conceptualizing integrated water resources management for implementing sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(2), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00733-5

Al-Saidi, M. (2017). Conflicts and security in integrated water resources management. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.015

Rahaman, M. M., & Varis, O. (2005). Integrated water resources management: evolution, prospects and future challenges. Sustainability: science, practice and policy, 1(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2005.11907961

Tortajada, C. (2010). Water governance: Some critical issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900621003683298

Batchelor, C. (2007). Water governance literature assessment. International Institute for Environment and Development. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02523.pdf. Retrieved 16 Nov 2021.

Hooper, B. P. (2003). Integrated water resources management and river basin governance. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 126(1), 3.

UNDP. (2004). Water governance for poverty reduction: Key issues and the UNDP response to millennium development goals, New York, NY: UNDP.

Piyapong, J., Thidarat, B., Jaruwan, C., Siriphan, N., & Passanan, A. (2019). Enhancing citizens’ sense of personal responsibility and risk perception for promoting public participation in sustainable groundwater resource management in Rayong Groundwater Basin. Thailand. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9, 100252.

Fritsch, O. (2017). Integrated and adaptive water resources management: Exploring public participation in the UK. Regional Environmental Change, 17(7), 1933–1944.

Razzaque, J. (2009). Public participation in water governance. In: Dellapenna J.W., Gupta J. (eds) The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9867-3_21

Skoulikaris, C. H., Filali-Meknassi, Y., Aureli, A., Amani, A., & Jiménez-Cisneros, B. E. (2018). Information-communication technologies as an integrated water resources management (IWRM) tool for sustainable development. In: Komatina, D. (Eds) Integrated River Basin Management for Sustainable Development of Regions, InTech Publications. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74700

Estévez, R. A., Alamos, F. H., Walshe, T., & Gelcich, S. (2018). Accounting for uncertainty in value judgements when applying multi-attribute value theory. Environmental Modeling Assessment, 23, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9555-5

Rollason, E., Bracken, L. J., Hardy, R. J., & Large, A. R. G. (2018). Evaluating the success of public participation in integrated catchment management. Journal of Environmental Management, 228, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.024

Rouillard, J. J., & Spray, C. J. (2017). Working across scales in integrated catchment management: Lessons learned for adaptive water governance from regional experiences. Regional Environmental Change, 17(7), 1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0988-1

EC. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (water framework directive). Off J Eur Communities L327 1–72, 22 December.

Newig, J., & Koontz, T. M. (2014). Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European public policy, 21(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834070

Anggraeni, M., Gupta, J., & Verrest, H. J. (2019). Cost and value of stakeholders participation: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.012

Pellegrini, E., Bortolini, L., & Defrancesco, E. (2019). Coordination and participation boards under the European Water Framework Directive: Different approaches used in some EU countries. Water, 11(4), 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040833

Uittenbroek, C. J., Mees, H. L., Hegger, D. L., & Driessen, P. P. (2019). The design of public participation: Who participates, when and how? Insights in climate adaptation planning from the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14), 2529–2547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1569503

Euler, J., & Heldt, S. (2018). From information to participation and self-organization: Visions for European river basin management. Science of the Total Environment, 621, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.072

Mouratiadou, I., & Moran, D. (2007). Mapping public participation in the Water Framework Directive: A case study of the Pinios River Basin. Greece. Ecological economics, 62(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.009

Villada-Canela, M., Muñoz-Pizza, D. M., García-Searcy, V., Camacho-López, R., Daesslé, L. W., & Mendoza-Espinosa, L. (2021). Public participation for integrated groundwater management: The case of Maneadero Valley, Baja California. Mexico. Water, 13(17), 2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172326

Kabogo, J. E., Anderson, E. P., Hyera, P., & Kajanja, G. (2017). Facilitating public participation in water resources management. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09739-220426

Tsang, S., Burnett, M., Hills, P., & Welford, R. (2009). Trust, public participation and environmental governance in Hong Kong. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.502

Brouwer, S., Van der Wielen, P. W., Schriks, M., Claassen, M., & Frijns, J. (2018). Public participation in science: The future and value of citizen science in the drinking water research. Water, 10(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030284

Buytaert, W., et al. (2014). Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: Opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2014.00026

Mukhtarov, F., Dieperink, C., & Driessen, P. (2018). The influence of information and communication technologies on public participation in urban water governance: A review of place-based research. Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.015

Aladuwaka, S., & Momsen, J. (2010). Sustainable development, water resources management and women’s empowerment: The Wanaraniya Water Project in Sri Lanka. Gender & Development, 18(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552071003600026

Farjad, B., Pooyandeh, M., Gupta, A., Motamedi, M., & Marceau, D. (2017). Modelling Interactions between land use, climate, and hydrology along with stakeholders’ negotiation for water resources management. Sustainability, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112022

Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juízo, D. (2014). Integrating stakeholders’ preferences into water resources management planning in the Incomati River Basin. Water Resources Management, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0500-3

Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007

Mirzaei, A., & Zibaei, M. (2021). Water conflict management between agriculture and wetland under climate change: Application of Economic-Hydrological-Behavioral Modelling. Water Resources Management, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02703-4

Akhbari, M., & Grigg, N. S. (2013). A framework for an agent-based model to manage water resources conflicts. Water resources management, 27(11), 4039–4052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0394-0

Reeves, H. W., & Zellner, M. L. (2010). Linking MODFLOW with an agent-based land-use model to support decision making. Groundwater, 48(5), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00677.x

Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., & Giardino, A. (2017). Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 91, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014

Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2015). Evaluating participatory research: Framework, methods and implementation results. Journal of environmental management, 157, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.014

Hare, M. (2011). Forms of participatory modelling and its potential for widespread adoption in the water sector. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(6), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.590

Vassoney, E., Mochet, A. M., & Comoglio, C. (2017). Use of multicriteria analysis (MCA) for sustainable hydropower planning and management. Journal of environmental management, 196, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.067

Ganoulis, J., Skoulikaris, H., & Monget, J. M. (2008). Involving stakeholders in transboundary water resource management: The Mesta/Nestos ‘HELP’basin. Water SA, 34(4), 461–467.

Sheppard, S. R., & Meitner, M. (2005). Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest ecology and management, 207(1–2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032

Kuang, H., Kilgour, D. H., & Hipel, K. W. (2015). Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies. Information Sciences, 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.035

Roozbahani, A., Zahraie, B., & Tabesh, M. (2012). PROMETHEE with Precedence Order in the Criteria (PPOC) as a new group decision making aid: An application in urban water supply management. Water Resources Management, 26, 3581–3599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0091-4

Latifi, M., Rakhshandehroo, G., Nikoo, M., & Sadegh, M. (2019). A game theoretical low impact development optimization model for urban storm water management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118323

De Brito, M. M., & Evers, M. (2016). Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16, 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.

Simpson, N. P., et al. (2021). A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth, 4(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005

Viavattene, C., Jiménez, J., Ferreira, Ó., Priest, S., Owen, D., & McCall, R. (2017). Selecting coastal hotspots to storm impacts at the regional scale: A coastal risk assessment framework. Coastal Engineering, 134, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.09.002

Maanan, M., Maanan, M., Rueff, H., Adouk, N., Zourarah, B., & Rhinane, H. (2018). Assess the human and environmental vulnerability for coastal hazard by using a multi-criteria decision analysis. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 24(6), 1642–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1421452

Santini, M., & Valentini, R. (2011). Predicting hot-spots of land use changes in Italy by ensemble forecasting. Regional Environmental Change, 11, 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0157-x

Marzocchi, W., Garcia-Aristizabal, A., Gasparini, P., Mastellone, M. L., & Di Ruocco, A. (2012). Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: A case study in Italy. Natural Hazards, 62, 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0092-x

Carpignano, A., Golia, E., Di Mauro, C., Bouchon, S., & Nordvik, J.-P. (2009). A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: First application. Journal of Risk Research, 12(3–4), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903050269

Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, R. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32(5), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017

Adomokai, R., & Sheate, W. R. (2004). Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(5), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002

Ritzema, H. P., Thinh, L. D., Anh, L. Q., Hanh, D. N., Chien, N. V., Lan, T. N., Kselik, R. A. L., & Kim, B. T. (2008). Participatory research on the effectiveness of drainage in the Red River Delta. Vietnam. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 22(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-007-9028-0

Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J., & van der Veen, A. (2008). Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: An exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z

Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., & Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 3013–3030. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3013-2013

Nicholls, R. J., Hutton, C. W., Lázár, A. N., Allan, A., Adger, W. N., Adams, H., Wolf, J., Rahman, M., & Salehin, M. (2016). Integrated assessment of social and environmental sustainability dynamics in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta, Bangladesh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 183, 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.017

Hagenlocher, M., Renaud, F. G., Haas, S., & Sebesvari, Z. (2018). Vulnerability and risk of deltaic social-ecological systems exposed to multiple hazards. Science of The Total Environment, 631–632, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.013

Pishyar, S., Khosravi, H., Tavili, A., Malekian, A., & Sabouriradet, S. (2020). A combined AHP- and TOPSIS-based approach in the assessment of desertification disaster risk. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 25, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-019-09676-8

Loizidou, X. I., Orthodoxou, D. L., Loizides, M. I., & Krestenitis, Y. N. (2021). A community-based approach for site-specific policies and solutions on marine litter: The example of Paphos. Cyprus. Environment Systems and Decisions, 41(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09786-9

Ganoulis, J., & Skoulikaris, C. (2011). Impact of climate change on hydropower generation and irrigation: A case study from Greece. In: Baba A., Tayfur G., Gündüz O., Howard K., Friedel M., Chambel A. (Eds) Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1143-3_10

Androulidakis, Y., Kombiadou, K., Makris, C., Baltikas, V., & Krestenitis, Y. (2015). Storm surges in the Mediterranean Sea: Variability and trends under future climatic conditions. Dynamics Atmospheres and Oceans, 71, 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2015.06.001

Makris, C., Galiatsatou, P., Tolika, K., Anagnostopoulou, C., Kombiadou, K., Prinos, P., Velikou, K., Kapelonis, Z., Tragou, E., Androulidakis, Y., Athanassoulis, G., Vagenas, C., Tegoulias, I., Baltikas, V., Krestenitis, Y., Gerostathis, T., Belibassakis, K., & Rusu, E. (2016). Climate change effects on the marine characteristics of the Aegean and the Ionian Seas. Ocean Dynamics, 66(12), 1603–1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-016-1008-1

Skoulikaris, C., Makris, C., Katirtzidou, M., Baltikas, V., & Krestenitis, Y. (2021). Assessing the vulnerability of a deltaic environment due to climate change impact on surface and coastal waters: The case of Nestos River (Greece). Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 26, 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09746-2

Reynaud, A., & Nguyen, M. H. (2016). Valuing flood risk reductions. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 21, 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-016-9500-z

Koutrakis, E., et al. (2010). Public stakeholders’ perception of ICZM and coastal erosion in the Mediterranean. Coastal Management, 38, 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2010.487148

Pomeroy, R., & Rivera-Guieb, R. (2006). Fishery co-management. A practical handbook. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing and Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

Vierros, M., Douvere, F., & Arico, S. (2006). Implementing the ecosystem approach in open oceans and deep sea environments. An analysis of stakeholders, their interests and existing approaches. United Nations University, in Cooperation with UNESCO, 1–40

Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (2005). PROMETHEE methods. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 78. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_5

Mareschal, B., & Brans, J. P. (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 34, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Berghöfer U., & Berghöfer A. (2006). Participation’ in development thinking — Coming to grips with a truism and its critiques. In: Stollkleemann S., Welp M. (Eds) Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Environmental Science and Engineering (Environmental Science). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36917-2_4

Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specifity. World Development, 8, 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X

Veraart, J. A., van Ierland, E., Werners, S., Verhagen, J., Groot, R., Kuikman, P., & Kabat, P. (2010). Climate change impacts on water management and adaptation strategies in The Netherlands: Stakeholder and scientific expert judgements. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239081003722163

Gregory, A., Atkins, J., Midgley, G., & Hodgson, A. (2020). Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(1), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.044

Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001

Esteve, P., Varela-Ortega, C., & Downing, T. E. (2018). A stakeholder-based assessment of barriers to climate change adaptation in a water-scarce basin in Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 18, 2505–2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1366-y

Eisenack, K., Tekken, V., & Kropp, J. (2007). Stakeholder perceptions of climate change in the Baltic Sea Region. Coastline Reports, 8, 245–255.

Blázquez, L., García, J., & Bodoque, J. (2021). Stakeholder analysis: Mapping the river networks for integrated flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.024

Yang, L., Chan, F., & Scheffran, J. (2018). Climate change, water management and stakeholder analysis in the Dongjiang River basin in South China. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1264294

Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052

de Bruin, K., et al. (2009). Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: An inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Climatic Change, 95, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9576-4

Tompkins, E., Few, R., & Brown, K. (2008). Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1580–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025

Balane, M. A., Palafox, B., Palileo-Villanueva, L. M., McKee, M., & Balabanova, D. (2020). Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: Towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Global Health, 5, e002661.

Reed, M., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C., & Stringer, L. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

van Dam, J., & Junginger, M. (2011). Striving to further harmonization of sustainability criteria for bioenergy in Europe: Recommendations from a stakeholder questionnaire. Energy Policy, 39(7), 4051–4066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.022

D’Agostino, D., Borg, M., Hallett, S. H., Sakrabani, R. S., Thompson, A., Papadimitriou, L., & Knox, J. W. (2020). Multi-stakeholder analysis to improve agricultural water management policy and practice in Malta, Agricultural Water Management, 229, 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105920

Tolika, K., Makris, C., Baltikas, V., Velikou, K., & Krestenitis, Y. (2021). On the assessment of RCMs in simulating deep cyclones over the Mediterranean region: Impacts on the storm surges of coastal areas. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics, COMECAP 2021, September 26–29, 2021, Ioannina, Greece, 590–594.