Modeling Political Efficacy and Interest Group Membership

Scott H. Ainsworth1
1Department of Political Science, University of Georgia, Athens

Tóm tắt

Traditionally, political efficacy is measured at the individual level and studied as an individual level attribute in isolation from macro level events. In many studies, political efficacy is viewed as largely static, affected primarily by levels of income and education. If, however, an individual's feeling of efficacy is partly conditioned on macro level occurrences or expected macro level occurrences, then individual efficacy cannot be studied in isolation from the macro level context. In this article, I create a game theoretic, micro level foundation for macro level interest group behavior. I use a simple participation game to model a form of individual level political efficacy and detail the empirical implications of the hypothesized individual level behavior for the aggregate levels of group membership. The results suggest that empirical studies of the effects of political efficacy on collective efforts are susceptible to sampling and measurement problems.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Achen, Christopher H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior 14: 195–211.

Ainsworth, Scott H. (1999). A strategic foundation for the cooperator's advantage. Theory and Decision 47: 101–110.

Ainsworth, Scott H. (1998). A game theoretic model of efficacy and political participation. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston.

Ainsworth, Scott and Sened, Itai (1993). Interest group entrepreneurs: entrepreneurs with two audiences. American Journal of Political Science 37: 834–866.

Aumann, Robert J. (1987). Correlated equilibria as an expression of bayesian rationality. Econometrica 55: 1–18.

Bentley, Arthur (1908). The Process of Government. Peter Odegard, ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.

Clarke, Harold D. and Acock, Alan C. (1989). National elections and political attitudes: the Case of political efficacy. British Journal of Political Science 19: 551–562.

Clark, Peter B. and Wilson, James Q. (1961). Incentive systems: a theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 6: 129–166.

Easton, David and Dennis, Jack. (1967). The child's acquisition of regime norms: political efficacy. American Political Science Review 61: 25–38.

Finkel, Steven E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29: 891–913.

Finkel, Steven E. and Edward N. Muller. (1998). Rational choice and the dynamics of political action. American Political Science Review 92: 37–50.

Finkel, Steven E., Muller, Edward N., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. American Political Science Review 83: 885–903.

Frohlich, Norman and Oppenheimer, Joe A. (1970). I get by with a little help from my friends. World Politics 23: 104–120.

Garson, G. David. (1978). Group Theories of Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Grafstein, Robert. (1991). An evidential theory of turnout. American Journal of Political Science 35: 989–1010.

Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hansen, John Mark. (1985). The political economy of group membership. American Political Science Review 79: 79–96.

Jennings, M. Kent and Niemi, Richard G. (1981). Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jones, Bryan D. (1999). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 297–321.

King, David C. and Walker, Jack L. (1992). The provision of benefits by interest groups in the United States. Journal of Politics 54: 394–426.

Klosko, George. (1987). Rebellious collective action revisited. American Political Science Review 81: 557–561.

Kornberg, Allan and Clarke, Harold D. (1992). Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kreps, David. (1990). Game Theory and Economic Modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kreps, David and Wilson, Robert. (1983). Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50: 863–894.

Kuklinski, James H., Luskin, Robert C., and Bolland, John. (1991). Where is the schema? going beyond the s word in political psychology. American Political Science Review 85: 1341–1356.

Leighley, Jan. (1991). Participation as a stimulus of political conceptualization. Journal of Politics 53: 198–212.

Lohmann, Susanne. (1995). The poverty of Green and Shapiro. Critical Review 9: 127–154.

Lohmann, Susanne. (1994). The dynamics of information cascades: the Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Politics 47: 42–101.

Lohmann, Susanne. (1993). A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action. American Political Science Review 87: 319–330.

Madsen, Douglas. (1987). Political self-efficacy tested. American Political Science Review 81: 571–582.

Madsen, Douglas. (1978). A structural approach to the explanation of political efficacy levels under democratic regimes. American Journal of Political Science 22: 867–883.

Moe, Terry M. (1980a). The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Moe, Terry M. (1980b). A calculus of group membership. American Journal of Political Science 24: 593–632.

Moe, Terry M. (1981). Toward a broader view of interest groups. Journal of Politics 43: 531–543.

Muller, Edward and Opp, Karl-Dieter. (1987). Rebellious collective action revisited. American Political Science Review 81: 561–564.

Muller, Edward and Opp, Karl-Dieter. (1986). Rational choice and rebellious collective action. American Political Science Review 80: 471–489.

Oliver, Pamela. (1984). 'If you don't do it, nobody else will': active and token contributors to collective action. American Sociological Review 49: 601–610.

Olson, Mancur. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Orbell, John and Dawes, Robyn M. (1991). A cognitive miser theory of cooperators' advantage. American Political Science Review 85: 515–528.

Palfrey, Thomas R. and Rosenthal, Howard. (1988). Private incentives in social dilemmas. Journal of Public Economics 35: 309–332.

Palfrey, Thomas R. and Rosenthal, Howard. (1984). Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: a strategic analysis. Journal of Public Economics 24: 171–193.

Pateman, Carole. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothenberg, Lawrence S. (1989). Putting the puzzle together: why people join interest groups? Public Choice 60: 241–257.

Rothenberg, Lawrence S. (1988). Organizational maintenance and the retention decision in groups. American Political Science Review 82: 1129–1152.

Salisbury, Robert H. (1975). Research on political participation. American Journal of Political Science 19: 323–341.

Salisbury, Robert H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13: 1–32.

Savage, Leonard J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

Schelling, Thomas C. (1980). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Shingles, Richard D. (1975). Community action and attitude change. Experimental Study of Politics 4: 38–81.

Sigelman, Lee, Roeder, Philip W., Jewell, Malcolm E., and Baer, Michael A. (1985). Voting and nonvoting: a multi-election perspective. American Journal of Political Science 29: 749–765.

Truman, David B. (1951). The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Walker, Jack. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. American Political Science Review 77: 390–406.

Wilson, James Q. (1973). Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.