Model-free angle stability assessment using wide area measurements
Tài liệu tham khảo
Phadke, 2008, Synchronous phasor measurements and their applications, 10.1007/978-0-387-76537-2
“Synchrophasor initiative in India, A report by Power System Operation Corporation Limited, India; December 2013.
“Power swing and out-of-step considerations on transmission lines, IEEE Power System Relaying Committee (PSRC) Working Group D6, Report; 2005.
Jóhannsson, 2013, Wide-area assessment of aperiodic small signal rotor angle stability in real-time, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 28, 4545, 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2271193
Yuan Y, Ju P, Li Q, Wang Y, Hu H, Sasaki H. A real-time monitoring method for power system steady state angle stability based on WAMS. Int Power Eng Conf; 2005.p. 761–4.
Ma S, Chen C, Liu C, Shen Z. A measurement-simulation hybrid method for transient stability assessment and control based on the deviation energy. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2020;vol. 115, article 105422.
Lyu R, Xue Y, Xue F, Wu Q, Yang G, Zhou H, Ju P. The qualitative criterion of transient angle stability. In: 10th International conference on advances in power system control, operation & management (APSCOM 2015); 2015. p. 1–6.
Cepeda, 2014, Real-time transient stability assessment based on centre-of-inertia estimation from phasor measurement unit records, IET Gen, Trans Dist, 8, 1363, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0616
Fang, 2009, Transient stability assessment using projection formulations, IET Gen Trans Dist, 3, 596, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2008.0583
Wang, 2018, Transient stability assessment using individual machine equal area criterion part I: unity principle, IEEE Access, 6, 77065, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2854227
Wang, 2018, Transient stability assessment using individual machine equal area criterion part II: stability margin, IEEE Access, 6, 38693, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853637
Wang, 2019, Transient stability assessment using individual machine equal area criterion part III: reference machine, IEEE Access, 7, 80174, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921035
Veerashekar, 2020, Quantitative transient stability assessment in microgrids combining both time-domain simulations and energy function analysis, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 115, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105506
Zhang, 1997, A method for real-time transient stability emergency control, IFAC Proc Vol, 30, 633, 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)46476-7
Ruiz-Vega, 2004, Online assessment and control of transient oscillations damping, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 19, 1038, 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825909
Cui, 2017, Dynamic state estimation assisted out-of-step detection for generators using angular difference, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 32, 1441, 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2615594
Ordonez CA, Chamorro HR, Quinterro J, Leelaruji R, Peng JC, Nordtstrom L. Prony-based on-line oscillation detection with real PMU information. In: Columbian conference on robotica and automation; 2016. p. 1–5.
Nabavi, 2014, A real-time distributed Prony-based algorithm for modal estimation of power system oscillations, 729
Zhou N, Huang Z, Tuffner F, Pierre J, Jin S. Automatic implementation of Prony analysis for electromechanical mode identification from phasor measurements. IEEE PES General Meeting; 2010. p. 1–8.
Khazaei, 2016, Distributed Prony analysis for real-world PMU data, Electr Power Syst Res, 133, 113, 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.12.008
Zhao, 2017, Forward and backward extended Prony (FBEP) method for power system small-signal stability analysis, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 32, 3618, 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2649879
Jahromi, 2016, A novel recursive approach for real-time transient stability assessment based on corrected kinetic energy, Appl Soft Comput, 448, 660, 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.045
Diao, 2010, Design of a real-time security assessment tool for situational awareness enhancement in modern power systems, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 25, 957, 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2035507
Yu, 2018, Intelligent time-adaptive transient stability assessment system, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 33, 1049, 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2707501
AL-Masri AN, Kadir MZAA, Hizam H, Mariun N. A novel implementation for generator rotor angle stability prediction using an adaptive artificial neural network application for dynamic security assessment. IEEE Trans Power Sys 2013;28(3): 2516–25.
Preece, 2015, Probabilistic risk assessment of rotor angle instability using fuzzy inference systems, IEEE Trans Power Sys, 30, 1747, 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2352678
Zhou, 2019, A novel data-driven approach for transient stability prediction of power systems considering the operational variability, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 107, 379, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.11.031
Dasgupta, 2015, PMU based model-free approach for real-time rotor angle monitoring, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 30, 2818, 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2357212
Wei, 2018, Model-free MLE estimation for online rotor angle stability assessment with PMU data, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 33, 2463, 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2761598
Hauer, 1990, Initial results in Prony analysis of power system response signals, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 5, 80, 10.1109/59.49090
Twomey, 1997
Moore, 1920, On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix, Bull Am Math Soc, 26, 394
Chandra, 2019, Online voltage stability and load margin assessment using wide area measurements, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 108, 392, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.021
“IEEE 118-bus system, Accessed on: May 9, 2019. [Online]. http://icseg.iti.illinois.edu/ieee-118-bus-system/.