Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks

Almond, G. A. (1956). Comparative political systems. The Journal of Politics, 18, 391–409.

Ashby, W. R. (1965 [1952]). Design for a brain. London: Chapman and Hall.

Balaam, D. N., & Veseth, M. (Eds.). (2001). Introduction to political economy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bast, G., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.). (2015). Arts, research, innovation and society. New York, NY: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/technology+management/book/978-3-319-09908-8 .

Bomberg, E., & Stubb, A. (2003). Introduction, 3-18. In E. Bomberg & A. Stubb (Eds.), The European Union: how does it work? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boulding, K. E. (1985). The world as a total system. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Bozeman, B., & Dietz, J. S. (2001). Research policy trends in the United States: civilian technology programs, defense technology and the deployment of the national laboratories. In P. Larédo & P. Mustar (Eds.), Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. An international comparative analysis (pp. 47–78). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Bush, V. (1945). Science: the endless frontier. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm#transmittal .

Campbell, D. F. J. (2001). Politische Steuerung über öffentliche Förderung universitärer Forschung? Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 30, 425–438.

Campbell, D. F. J. (2003). The evaluation of university research in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Germany and Austria. In P. Shapira & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe (pp. 98–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Campbell, D. F. J. (2004). Multi-level systems of innovation: functional and geographical aggregation. Early unpublished conceptual drawing. Vienna.

Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). The university/business research networks in science and technology: knowledge production trends in the United States, European Union and Japan. In E. G. Carayannis & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters (pp. 67–100). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.

Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2012). Lineare und nicht-lineare Knowledge Production: innovative Herausforderungen für das Hochschulsystem. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 7(2), 64–72. http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/448 .

Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013a). Epistemic governance in higher education. Quality enhancement of universities for development. SpringerBriefs in Business. New York, NY: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/organization/book/978-1-4614-4417-6 .

Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013b). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. In E. G. Carayannis, I. N. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, & D. Uzunidis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY (pp. 697–702).

Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. Technology, Innovation and Education, 2, 2. http://technology-innovation-education.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2 .

Campbell, D. F. J., & Felderer, B. (1997). Evaluating academic research in Germany. Patterns and policies. Vienna, Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS): Political Science Series No. 48. http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_48.pdf .

Campbell, D. F. J., & Schaller, C. (Eds.). (2002). Demokratiequalität in Österreich. Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

Campbell, D. F. J., & Sükösd, M. (Eds.). (2002). Feasibility study for a quality ranking of democracies. Vienna: Global Democracy Ranking.

Campbell, D. F. J., & Sükösd, M. (Eds.). (2003). Global quality ranking of democracies: pilot ranking 2000. Vienna: Global Democracy Ranking. http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/ranking/2000/data/folder_a4-e-03.pdf .

Campbell, D. F. J., Liebhart, K., Martinsen, R., Schaller, C., & Schedler, A. (1996). Vorwort, 5. In D. F. J. Campbell, K. Liebhart, R. Martinsen, C. Schaller, & A. Schedler (Eds.), Die Qualität der österreichischen Demokratie. Versuche einer Annäherung. Vienna: Manz.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.). (2006). Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=23374&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or .

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in Business. New York, NY: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-1-4614-2061-3 .

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3, 12. http://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-014-0012-2 .

Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/2192-5372-1-2.pdf .

Cooper, B., Kornberg, A., & Mishler, W. (Eds.). (1988). The resurgence of conservatism in Anglo-American democracies. Durham: Duke University Press.

Crane, G. T., & Amawi, A. (Eds.). (1997). The theoretical evolution of international political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Danilda, I., Lindberg, M., & Torstensson, B.-M. (2009). Women Resource Centres. A quattro helix innovation system on the European agenda. Paper.

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.

Easton, D. (1965a). Political life as a system of behavior. In D. Easton (Ed.), A framework for political analysis (pp. 23–34). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Easton, D. (1965b). Theory and behavioral research. In D. Easton (Ed.), A framework for political analysis (pp. 1–22). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Easton, D. (Ed.). (1965c). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as “quasi-firms”: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.

European Commission. (2009). The world in 2025. Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition. Brussels: European Commission.

Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Foerster, H. V. (1979). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In K. Krippendorff (Ed.), Communication and control in society (pp. 5–8). New York: Gordon and Breach.

Foerster, H. V. (Ed.). (1984a). Observing systems. Seaside, California: Intersystems Publications.

Foerster, H. V. (1984b). On self-organizing systems and their environments. In H. V. Foerster (Ed.), Observing systems (pp. 2–24). Seaside, California: Intersystems Publications.

Foerster, H. V., & Zopf, G. W., Jr. (Eds.). (1962). Principles of self-organization. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Freedom House. (2003). Freedom in the world 2003: the annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. Washington, D.C., New York: Freedom House.

Freedom House. (2004a). Freedom in the world 2004: global freedom gains amid terror, uncertainty. Washington, D.C., New York: Freedom House.

Freedom House. (2004b). Freedom in the world country ratings (1972 through 2003). Washington, DC, New York: Freedom House.

Frieden, J. A., & Lake, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). International political economy. Perspectives on global power and wealth. Boston: Bedford.

Geuna, A., & Steinmueller, W. E. (Eds.). (2003). Science and innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

Grant, R. M. (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis. Concepts, techniques, applications. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Gripp-Hagelstange, H. (1995). Niklas Luhmann. Eine Einführung. München: Wilhelm Fink.

Güttel, W. H. (2003). Die Identifikation strategischer immaterieller Vermögenswerte im Post-Merger-Integrationsprozess. Ressourcen- und Wissensmanagement bei Mergers-and-Acquisitions. München: Rainer Hampp.

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations. Politics, economics and culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2004). Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

IMD, International Institute for Management Development. (1996). The world competitiveness yearbook 1996. Lausanne: IMD.

IMD, International Institute for Management Development. (2003a). The world competitiveness scoreboard 2003. Lausanne: IMD. http://www02.imd.ch/documents/wcy/content/ranking.pdf .

IMD, International Institute for Management Development. (2003b). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2003. Overall rankings (1999–2003). Lausanne: IMD. http://www02.imd.ch/documents/wcy/content/pastranking.pdf .

IMD, International Institute for Management Development. (2004). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2004. Lausanne: IMD. http://www02.imd.ch/documents/wcy/wcyBookTour.pdf .

Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). The reconfiguration of national innovation systems—the example of German biotechnology. Research Policy, 33, 395–408.

Krippendorff, K. (Ed.). (1979). Communication and control in society. New York: Gordon and Breach.

Kuhlmann, S. (1998). Politikmoderation. Evaluationsverfahren in der Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Nomos: Baden-Baden.

Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe—three scenarios. Research Policy, 30, 953–976.

Larédo, P., & Mustar, P. (Eds.). (2001). Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. An international comparative analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Luhmann, N. (1988a). Neuere Entwicklungen in der Systemtheorie. Merkur, 42, 292–300.

Luhmann, N. (1988b). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Lundvall, B.-Å., & Tomlinson, M. (2002). International benchmarking as a policy learning tool. In M. J. Rodrigues (Ed.), The New Knowledge Economy in Europe. A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion (pp. 203–231). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31, 213–231.

Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (Eds.). (1991). Policy networks: empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Boulder: Westview Press.

Maturana, H. R. (1975). The organization of the living: a theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man—Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.

Maturana, H. R. (1985). Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit. Vieweg: Braunschweig.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1979). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.

Maturana, H. R., Varala, F. J., & Uribe, R. (1975). Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.

Mayntz, R. (1988). Funktionelle Teilsysteme in der Theorie sozialer Differenzierung. In R. Mayntz, B. Rosewitz, U. Schimank, & R. Stichweh (Eds.), Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme (pp. 11–44). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Mayntz, R., Rosewitz, B., Schimank, U., & Stichweh, R. (Eds.). (1988). Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Mowery, D. C. (2001). The United States national innovation system after the Cold War. In P. Larédo & P. Mustar (Eds.), Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. An International Comparative Analysis (pp. 15–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators 2002. Volume 1 and volume 2. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19, 193–214.

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2006). Re-thinking science: mode 2 in societal context. In E. G. Carayannis & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 39–51). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.

OECD (1994). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Frascati Manual 1993. Paris.

OECD (2002). Education policy analysis. Paris

OECD (2003a). Basic science and technology statistics. Paris

OECD (2003b). Education at a glance. OECD Indicators

OECD (2003c). Main science and technology indicators. Paris

Paslack, R. (1991). Urgeschichte der Selbstorganisation. Vieweg: Braunschweig.

Peters, B. G. (1998). Comparative politics. Theory and methods. London: Macmillan.

Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H., & Whittington, R. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of strategy and management. London: Sage.

Pfeffer, T. (2001). Das “zirkuläre Fragen” als Forschungsmethode zur Luhmannschen Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag.

Rosewitz, B., & Schimank, U. (1988). Verselbständigung und politische Steuerbarkeit gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme. In R. Mayntz, B. Rosewitz, U. Schimank, & R. Stichweh (Eds.), Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme (pp. 295–329). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Roth, G., & Schwegler, H. (Eds.). (1981). Self-organizing systems. An interdisciplinary approach. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.

Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

Shapira, P., & Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.). (2003). Learning from science and technology policy evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Stichweh, R. (1988a). Differenzierung des Wissenschaftssystems. In R. Mayntz, B. Rosewitz, U. Schimank, & R. Stichweh (Eds.), Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme (pp. 45–115). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Stichweh, R. (1988b). Inklusion in Funktionssysteme der modernen Gesellschaft. In R. Mayntz, B. Rosewitz, U. Schimank, & R. Stichweh (Eds.), Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme (pp. 261–293). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Tassey, G. (2001). R&D policy models and data needs. In M. P. Feldman & A. N. Link (Eds.), Innovation policy in the knowledge-based economy (pp. 37–71). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Umpleby, S. A. (1990). The science of cybernetics and the cybernetics of science. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 21, 109–121.

Umpleby, S. A. (1997). Cybernetics of conceptual systems. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 28, 635–652.

Umpleby, S. A. (2002). Should knowledge of management be organized as theories or as methods? In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and systems 2002. Volume 1 (pp. 492–497). Vienna: Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies.

Willke, H. (1989). Systemtheorie entwickelter Gesellschaften. Dynamik und Riskanz moderner gesellschaftlicher Selbstorganisation. München: Juventa Verlag Weinheim.

Willke, H. (1997). Supervision des Staates. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

Willke, H. (1998). Systemtheorie III: Steuerungstheorie. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius Verlagsgesellschaft.

World Bank (2002). World development indicators 2002. Washington, DC

Yergin, D., & Stanislaw, J. (2002). The commanding heights. The battle for the world economy. New York: Simon & Schuster.