Cảm xúc hỗn hợp, nhưng không phải cảm xúc tích cực hoặc tiêu cực, thúc đẩy hành vi phòng ngừa virus hợp pháp và kết quả thỏa mãn trong bối cảnh khủng hoảng COVID-19

Affective Science - Tập 2 - Trang 311-323 - 2021
Vincent Y. S. Oh1, Eddie M. W. Tong1
1Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Tóm tắt

Chúng tôi báo cáo bốn nghiên cứu (N=1419) xem xét phản ứng cảm xúc từ tháng Ba đến tháng Tư năm 2020, khi COVID-19 đã cho thấy sự gia tăng dịch tễ học một cách đáng kể với số ca nhiễm và tử vong. Cụ thể, chúng tôi đã kiểm tra mối liên hệ giữa cảm xúc với những ý định tự báo cáo trong việc thực hiện các hành vi phòng ngừa virus nhằm bảo vệ bản thân khỏi COVID-19 và chức năng thỏa mãn. Nghiên cứu 1A, 1B và Nghiên cứu 2 cung cấp bằng chứng thực nghiệm rằng cảm xúc hỗn hợp dự đoán chính xác các hành vi phòng ngừa virus và chức năng thỏa mãn ở Hoa Kỳ và Singapore, và Nghiên cứu 2 cũng hỗ trợ tính tiếp thu như một yếu tố trung gian. Cuối cùng, Nghiên cứu 3 cung cấp bằng chứng thực nghiệm rằng cảm xúc hỗn hợp đã làm tăng đáng kể các hành vi phòng ngừa virus hợp pháp so với các điều kiện cảm xúc trung lập, tích cực và tiêu cực, trong khi chức năng thỏa mãn chỉ được tăng lên so với điều kiện trung lập. Trong tất cả các nghiên cứu, cảm xúc tích cực và tiêu cực không có mối liên hệ với các hành vi phòng ngừa virus hợp pháp, trong khi các mối quan hệ với chức năng thỏa mãn lại không nhất quán. Mặc dù các biện pháp tự báo cáo không đại diện cho hành vi thực tế, những phát hiện này gợi ý về một vai trò tiềm năng của cảm xúc hỗn hợp trong những kết quả liên quan đến đại dịch.

Từ khóa

#COVID-19 #cảm xúc hỗn hợp #hành vi phòng ngừa virus #chức năng thỏa mãn #phản ứng cảm xúc

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, J. M., & Hershfield, H. E. (2012). Mixed emotional experience is associated with and precedes improvements in psychological well-being. PLoS One, 7, e35633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035633. Badour, C. L., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2017). Associations between specific negative emotions and DSM-5 PTSD among a national sample of interpersonal trauma survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1620–1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515589930. Baikie, K. A., Geerligs, L., & Wilhelm, K. (2012). Expressive writing and positive writing for participants with mood disorders: An online randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.032. Barford, K. A., Koval, P., Kuppens, P., & Smillie, L. D. (2020). When good feelings turn mixed: Affective dynamics and big five trait predictors of mixed emotions in daily life. European Journal of Personality, 34, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2264. Barford, K. A., & Smillie, L. D. (2016). Openness and other Big Five traits in relation to dispositional mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.002. Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Eudaimonic growth: Narrative growth goals predict increases in ego development and subjective well-being 3 years later. Developmental Psychology, 46, 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019654. Beedie, C., Terry, P., & Lane, A. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 847–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000057. Berrios, R., Totterdell, P., & Kellett, S. (2015). Eliciting mixed emotions: A meta-analysis comparing models, types, and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, e00428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00428. Berrios, R., Totterdell, P., & Kellett, S. (2018). When feeling mixed can be meaningful: The relation between mixed emotions and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9849-y. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates. Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006. Dalton, C., Corbett, S., & Katelaris, A. (2020). Pre-emptive low cost social distancing and enhanced hygiene implemented before local COVID-19 transmission could decrease the number and severity of cases. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3549276. Dejonckheere, E., Mestdagh, M., Houben, M., Rutten, I., Sels, L., Kuppens, P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2019). Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0. Durso, G. R. O., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2016). From power to inaction: Ambivalence gives pause to the powerful. Psychological Science, 27, 1660–1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669947. Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5. Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798182. Forgas, J. P. (2019). Happy believers and sad skeptics? Affective influences on gullibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419834543. Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218. Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: The medium is the message. The Lancet, 395, 942–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-0. Gloria, C. T., & Steinhardt, M. A. (2016). Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health: Positive emotions, resilience and health. Stress and Health, 32, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2589. Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The balanced inventory of desirable responding short form (BIDR-16). SAGE Open, 5, 215824401562111. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621113. Hui, C. M., Fok, H. K., & Bond, M. H. (2009). Who feels more ambivalence? Linking dialectical thinking to mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.022. Huta, V. (2013). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 139–158). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14092-008. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0. Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379140. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, e00863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003. Larsen, J. T., Hemenover, S. H., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Turning adversity to advantage: On the virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 211–225). https://doi.org/10.1037/10566-015. Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Stastny, B. J., & Hester, N. (2017). On the relationship between positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231. Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146. Lewnard, J. A., & Lo, N. C. (2020). Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, S1473309920301900, 631–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30190-0. McCarthy, J. (2020). U.S. Emotions Mixed After a Tense Month of COVID-19 Response. Gallup Panel. https://news.gallup.com/poll/306026/emotions-mixed-tense-month-covid-response.aspx Mejía, S. T., & Hooker, K. (2017). Mixed emotions within the context of goal pursuit. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.015. Miyamoto, Y., & Ryff, C. D. (2011). Cultural differences in the dialectical and non-dialectical emotional styles and their implications for health. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003612114. Newman, D. B., Sachs, M. E., Stone, A. A., & Schwarz, N. (2019). Nostalgia and well-being in daily life: An ecological validity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000236. Pasion, R., Paiva, T. O., Fernandes, C., & Barbosa, F. (2020). The age effect on protective behaviors during the covid-19 outbreak: Sociodemographic, perceptions and psychological accounts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561785. Permut, S., Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2019). Taskmaster: A tool for determining when subjects are on task. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838479. Rees, L., Rothman, N. B., Lehavy, R., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.017. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. Selby, E. A., Kranzler, A., Panza, E., & Fehling, K. B. (2016). Bidirectional-compounding effects of rumination and negative emotion in predicting impulsive behavior: Implications for emotional cascades: bidirectional-compounding rumination. Journal of Personality, 84, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12147. Timmons, S., McGinnity, F., Belton, C., Barjaková, M., & Lunn, P. (2020). It depends on how you ask: Measuring bias in population surveys of compliance with COVID-19 public health guidance. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75, 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-215256. Tran, H. N., Lipinski, A. J., Peter, S. C., Dodson, T. S., Majeed, R., Savage, U. C., & Beck, J. G. (2019). The association between posttraumatic negative self-conscious cognitions and emotions and maladaptive behaviors: Does time since trauma exposure matter? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22388. Vaccaro, A. G., Kaplan, J. T., & Damasio, A. (2020). Bittersweet: The neuroscience of ambivalent affect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 174569162092770, 1187–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927708. van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H. U., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence: affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 285–324). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002. van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & de Liver, Y. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308324518. Young, E. S., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Waters, T. E. A., & Mittal, C. (2018). Can an unpredictable childhood environment enhance working memory? Testing the sensitized-specialization hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000124. Ziegler, R. (2014). Mood and processing effort. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 287–355). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00005-6.