Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baldwin MF (1985) Establishing a wetland protection system under EPA’s wetland protection and review authorities: a concept paper prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Federal Activities, March 1985. EPA contract No. 68-01-6558, Subcontract No. 130.164. Baldwin Associates, Great Falls, VA, 43 pp
Barrows DB (1986) Mitigation in the Army Corps of Engineers regulatory program. National Wetlands Newsl 8(5):11–12
Blumm MC, Zaleha DB (1989) Federal wetlands protection under the Clean Water Act: regulatory ambivalence, intergovernmental tension, and a call for reform. Univ Colo Law Rev 60:695–772
Brinson MM (1996) Assessing wetland functions using HGM. National Wetlands Newsl 18(1):10–21
Brown JD (1989) Wetlands mitigation: US Fish and Wildlife Service policy and perspectives. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons JW (eds) Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, pp 861–868
Brumbaugh RW, Reppert R (1994) National wetland mitigation banking study: first phase report. Report IWR 94-WMB-4. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, VA
CEQ [Council on Environmental Quality] (1978) National environmental policy act––regulations: implementation of procedural provisions. Fed Regist 43:55977–56007
Ciupek RB (1986) Protecting wetlands under Clean Water Act Section 404: EPA’s conservative policy on mitigation. National Wetlands Newsl 8(5):12–13
Conservation Foundation (1988) Protecting America’s wetlands: an action agenda. The final report of the National Wetlands Policy Forum. The Conservation Foundation, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1968) Part 209––administrative procedure: revision of Part. Fed Regist 33:18670–18693
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1973) Permits for activities in navigable waters or ocean waters. Fed Regist 38:12217–12230
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1982) Interim Final Rule for Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers. Fed Regist 47:31794–31834
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1983) Proposal to amend permit regulations for controlling certain activities in waters of the United States. Fed Regist 48:21466–21476
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1984a) Proposal to amend permit regulations for controlling certain activities in waters of the United States. Fed Regist 49:12660–12664
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1984b) EPA’s role in determining compliance with sec 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Regulatory Guidance Letter 84–06, issued 26 March 1984, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1985) Implementation of Fish & Wildlife mitigation in the Corps of Engineers regulatory program. Regulatory Guidance Letter 85-08, issued 11 November 1985, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1986) Final rule for regulatory programs of the Corps of Engineers. Fed Regist 51:41206–41260
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (1991) Final rule for nationwide permit program regulations and issue, reissue and modify nationwide permits. Fed Regist 56:59109–59147
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (2003) Memorandum to the field: model “Operational guidelines for creating or restoring wetlands that are ecologically self-sustaining” for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. http://www.mitigationactionplan.gov/nas404program.pdf . Cited 10 May 2007
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (2006) Draft environmental assessment, finding of no significant impact, and regulatory analysis for proposed compensatory mitigation regulation. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers] (2007) Reissuance of nationwide permits. Fed Regist 72:11092–11198
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1989) Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Environmental Protection Agency concerning the determination of the Section 404 Program and the application of the exemptions under Section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act. Signed 19 January 1989, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1990) Memorandum of Agreement Between The Department of the Army and The Environmental Protection Agency: The Determination of Mitigation under the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Signed 6 February 1990, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (2002) Guidance on compensatory mitigation projects under the Corps Regulatory Program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Regulatory Guidance Letter 02-2, issued 24 December 2002, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (2003) Multi-agency compensatory mitigation plan checklist. http://www.mitigationactionplan.gov/checklist.pdf . Cited 10 May 2007
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (2008) Compensatory mitigation for losses of aquatic resources. Fed Regist 73:19594–19705
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], FWS [US Fish and Wildlife Service] (1967) Memorandum of Agreement between Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor and Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall. 13 July 1967, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service (1995) Federal guidance for the establishment, use and operation of mitigation banks. Federal Register 60:58605–58614
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2000) Federal guidance on the use of in-lieu-fee arrangements for compensatory mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers Harbors Act. Signed 26 May 2000, Washington DC
Corps [US Army Corps of Engineers], US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Transportation, USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (2002) National Mitigation Action Plan. Issued 24 December 2002. http://www.mitigationactionplan.gov/map1226withsign.pdf . Cited 10 May 2007
Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. USFWS Office of Biological Services, Washington DC
Dahl TE (1990) Wetlands losses in the United States 1780s to 1980s. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC
DPC [Domestic Policy Council Task Force on Wetlands] (1991) President’s implementation plan. White House Domestic Policy Council, Washington DC
ELI [Environmental Law Institute] (2007) Mitigation of impacts to fish and wildlife habitat: estimating costs and identifying opportunities. ELI, Washington DC
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1975) Part 230––Navigable waters: discharge of dredged or fill material. Fed Regist 40:41291–41298
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1980) Guidelines for specification of disposal sites for dredged or fill material. Fed Regist 45:85336–85357
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1982) Guidelines for specification of disposal sites for dredged or fill material. Fed Regist 47:36797–36799
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1985) Notes from conference call, 3/5/1985. EPA Wetlands Division Mitigation Library file “1985 Prioritization Concept Paper”, Washington DC
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1986) Final determination of the Assistant Administrator for External Affairs concerning the Sweedens Swamp site in Attleboro, Massachusetts pursuant to Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act. Signed 13 May 1986. http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/regs/404c.html . Cited 8 April 2007
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1992) Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines; revisions regarding sequencing based on a categorization scheme. Fed Regist 57:52056
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency] (1994) Exception from wetlands mitigation sequence for Alaska. Fed Regist 59:26162–26167
EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency]. n.d. Clean Water Action Plan mitigation study, tab 4: proposed scope of study to evaluate the effectiveness of compensatory mitigation options in achieving no net loss. EPA Wetlands Division Mitigation Library file “Clean Water Action Plan”, Washington DC
EPA OPPE [US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Planning and Policy Evaluation] (1991) Market-based approach for wetland regulation. Unsigned memo, dated 1 August 1991
Erwin KL (1991) An evaluation of wetland mitigation in the South Florida Water Management District, vol 1. Methodology. SFWMD, West Palm Beach, FL
Frayer WE, Monahan TJ, Bowden DC, Graybill FA (1983) Status and trends of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950’s to 1970’s. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC
FWS [US Fish and Wildlife Service] (1981) US Fish and Wildlife Service mitigation policy; notice of final policy. Fed Regist 46:7644–7663
FWS [US Fish, Wildlife Service] (1983) Interim guidance on mitigation banking. Ecological services instructional memorandum No. 80. USFWS, Washington DC
GAO [US General Accounting Office] (1988) Wetlands: the Corps of Engineers’ administration of the Section 404 program. Report GAO/RCED-88-110. GAO, Washington DC
GAO [US General Accounting Office] (2001) Assessments needed to determine effectiveness of in-lieu-fee mitigation. Report GAO-01-325. GAO, Washington DC
GAO [US Government Accountability Office] (2005) Corps of Engineers does not have an effective oversight approach to ensure that compensatory mitigation is occurring. Report GAO-05-898. GAO, Washington DC
Gardner RC (2000) Money for nothing?: the rise of wetland fee mitigation. VA Environ Law J 19:1–56
Glubiak PG, Nowka RH, Mitsch WJ (1986) Federal and state management of inland wetlands: are states ready to assume control? Environ Manage 10:145–156
Goldstein J (1991) Introduction. In: Heimlich RE (ed) A national policy of “no net loss” of wetlands: what do agricultural economists have to contribute? USDA Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, Washington DC, pp 1–3
Hall JR (1988) A perspective on influencing the Corps of Engineers. In: Kusler JA (ed) Mitigation of impacts and losses. ASWM, Berne, pp 60–65
Heinen ET (1985) Letter from ET Heinen, EPA Region 4, to J Cooper, EPA Assistant Administrator for External Affairs. 1 May 1985, 8 pp
Houck OA (1989) Hard choices: the analysis of alternatives under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and similar environmental laws. Univ Colo Law Rev 60:773–840
Houck OA, Rolland M (1995) Federalism in wetlands regulation: a consideration of delegation of Clean Water Act Section 404 and related programs to the states. Maryland Law Rev 54:1242–1314
Kantor RA, Charette DJ (1988) Origin, evolution, and results of New Jersey’s wetlands mitigation policy. In: Kusler JA (ed) Mitigation of impacts and losses. ASWM, Berne, pp 103–105
Kelly P (1989) Memorandum: permit elevation, Plantation Landing Resort, Inc. Signed 21 April 1989. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC, 15 pp. http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/PlantationLandingRGL.pdf
Kruczynski WL (1990) Mitigation and the Section 404 program: a perspective. In: Kusler JA, Kentula ME (eds) Wetlands creation and restoration: the status of the science. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 549–554
Kusler JA, Groman H (1986) Mitigation: an introduction. National Wetlands Newsl 8(5):2–3
Kusler JA, Kentula ME (1990) Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. Island Press, Washington DC
LaRoe ET (1986) Wetland habitat mitigation: an historical overview. National Wetlands Newsl 8(5):8–10
Liebesman LR (1984) The role of EPA’s guidelines in the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit program––judicial interpretation and administrative application. Environ Law Rep 14:10272–10278
Mack JJ, Micacchion M (2006) An ecological assessment of Ohio mitigation banks: vegetation, amphibians, hydrology and soils. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2006-1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus OH
McChesney FL (1983) Corps recasts Section 404 permit program, braces for political, legal skirmishes. Environ Law Rep 13:10128–10134
NRC [National Research Council] (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington DC
NRC [National Research Council] (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington DC
Page RW (1988) Letter from RW Page, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), to J Duffus III, Government Accounting Office. 9 June 1988, 19 pp
Race MS, Christie DR (1982) Coastal zone development: mitigation, marsh creation, and decision-making. Environ Manage 6:317–328
Reiss KC, Hernandez E, Brown MT (2007) An evaluation of the effectiveness of mitigation banking in Florida: ecological success and compliance with permit criteria. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wetlands/docs/mitigation/Final_Report.pdf
Robertson M (2006) Emerging ecosystem service markets: trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking. Front Ecol Environ 6:297–302
Robertson M, Hayden N (2008) Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago, USA. Conserv Biol (in press)
Ruhl JB, Salzman J (2006) The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. National Wetlands Newsl 28(2):1, 9–14
Shabman LA, Scodari P, King DM (1994) National wetland mitigation banking study: expanding opportunities for successful mitigation: The Private Credit Market Alternative. Report IWR 94-WMB-3. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria VA
Soileau DM (1984) Final report on the Tenneco Laterre Corporation mitigation banking proposal, Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Lafayette, LA
Spieles D (2005) Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation wetland banks of the United States. Wetlands 25:51–63
USGPO [United States Government Printing Office] (1989) Congressional record of the 101st congress, vol 135, part 20 (11/8/89 to 11/15/89). GPO, Washington DC
Webb JW, Landin MC, Allen HH (1986) Approaches and techniques for wetlands development and restoration of dredged material disposal sites. In: Kusler JA, Quammen ML, Brooks RP (eds) Mitigation of impacts and losses. ASWM, Berne, pp 132–134
WHOEP [White House Office on Environmental Policy] (1993) Protecting America’s wetlands: a fair, flexible and effective approach. The White House, Washington DC
WHOPS [White House Office of the Press Secretary] (1991) Fact sheet: protecting America’s wetlands. The White House, Washington DC
Wilkinson J, Thompson J (2006) 2005 Status report on compensatory mitigation in the United States. Environmental Law Institute, Washington DC
Wood LD (2004) Don’t be misled: CWA jurisdiction extends to all non-navigable tributaries of the traditional navigable waters and to their adjacent wetlands (a response to the Virginia Albrecht/Stephen Nicklesburg ELR article, to the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Re Needham, and to the Supreme Court’s dicta in SWANCC). Environ Law Report 34:10187–10217