Miscarriage chromosome testing: Indications, benefits and methodologies

Benkhalifa, 2005, Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro, Prenatal Diagnosis, 25, 894, 10.1002/pd.1230 Roman, 1984, Fetal loss rates and their relation to pregnancy order, J Epidemiol Commun Health, 38, 29, 10.1136/jech.38.1.29 Stirrat, 1990, Recurrent miscarriage, Lancet, 336, 673, 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92159-F Stephenson, 1996, Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples, Fertil Steril, 66, 24, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58382-4 Sugiura-Ogasawara, 2012, Abnormal embryonickaryotype is the most frequent cause of recurrent miscarriage, Hum Reprod, 27, 2297, 10.1093/humrep/des179 Popescu, 2018, Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients, Human Reprod, 33, 579, 10.1093/humrep/dey021 Stephenson, 2002, Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study, Hum Reprod, 17, 446, 10.1093/humrep/17.2.446 Levy, 2014, Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis, Obstet Gynecol, 124, 202, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000325 Jacobs, 1997, Turner syndrome: a cytogenetic and molecular study, Ann Hum Genet, 61, 471, 10.1017/S0003480097006507 Bernardi, 2012, Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation, Fertil Steril, 98, 156, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.038 Foyouzi, 2012, Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss, Fertil Steril, 98, 151, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.007 Bell, 1999, Cyogenetic diagnosis of normal 46, XX karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading, Fert STeril, 71, 334, 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00445-2 Lathi, 2012, Informatics enhanced SNP microarray analysis of 30 miscarriage samples compared to routine cytogenetics, PloS One, 7, e31282, 10.1371/journal.pone.0031282 Benkhalifa, 2005, Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro, Prenatal Diagn, 25, 894, 10.1002/pd.1230 Dhillon, 2014, Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BJOG, 121, 11, 10.1111/1471-0528.12382 Shah, 2017, Comparison of cytogenetics and molecular karyotyping for chromosome testing of miscarriage specimens, Fertil Steril, 107, 1028, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.022 Murugappan, 2014, Separation of miscarriage tissue from maternal decidua for chromosome analysis, Fertil Steril, 102, e9, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.006 McNally, 2016, Patient experience with karyotyping after first trimester miscarriage: a national survey, Reprod Med, 61, 128