Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total knee replacement; medium term results with minimum five year follow-up

Von Langenbeck, 1874, Über die Schussverietzungen [sic] des Hüftgelenks, Arch Klin Chir, 16, 263 Diduch, 1997, Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79, 575, 10.2106/00004623-199704000-00015 Malkani, 1995, Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, 423, 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00012 Rand, 1991, Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73, 397, 10.2106/00004623-199173030-00011 Argenson, 2004, Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Knee, 11, 341, 10.1016/j.knee.2003.12.002 Romanowski, 2002, Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up, J Knee Surg, 15, 17 Tomek, 2014, Early patient outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty with quadriceps-sparing subvastus and medial parapatellar techniques: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96, 907, 10.2106/JBJS.L.01578 King, 2007, Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, 1497, 10.2106/00004623-200707000-00013 Chen, 2006, Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, 1448, 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.18052 Yassin, 2005, Prospective study comparing minimally invasive total knee replacement with the conventional trans-vastus approach, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87-B Tria, 2015, Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: an overview, World J Orthop, 6, 804, 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.804 Stevens-Lapsley, 2012, Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improves early knee strength but not functional performance: a randomized controlled trial, J Arthroplasty, 27, 1812, 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.016 Stevens-Lapsley, 2015, Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty does not improve outcomes 1year after surgery: a randomized controlled trial, J Clin Trials, 207 Wulker, 2010, A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, 1584, 10.2106/JBJS.H.01070 Dalury, 2009, Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, 1339, 10.2106/JBJS.H.00435 Jenkins, 2014, A randomized, controlled, prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96, 851, 10.2106/JBJS.L.01513 NICE, 2010, NICE interventional procedure guidance [IPG345] Tasker, 2014, Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2year follow up, Knee, 21, 189, 10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010 Graphpad Prism for windows. 6.00 ed. La Jolla, California, USA: Graphpad Software 2012. Unnanuntana, 2012, Minimally invasive and standard total knee arthroplasty result in similar clinical outcomes at a minimum of five-year follow-up, J Med Assoc Thai, 95, S29 Khakha, 2014, Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) — a population matched study, Knee, 21, 944, 10.1016/j.knee.2014.06.007 Yassin, 2005, Prospective study comparing minimally invasive total knee replacement with the conventional trans-vastus approach, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87-B Laskin, 2004, Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 428, 10.1097/01.blo.0000148582.86102.47 Kolisek, 2007, Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach, J Arthroplasty, 22, 8, 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 Roidis, 2007, Incision stretching in primary TKA: what is the real length of our approach?, Orthopedics, 30, 397, 10.3928/01477447-20070501-06 Karachalios, 2008, Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90-B, 584, 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20122 Wülker, 2010, A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery, J Bone Joint Surg, 92, 1584, 10.2106/JBJS.H.01070 Wegrzyn, 2013, The John Insall Award: no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes: a randomized controlled trial, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, 46, 10.1007/s11999-012-2486-1 Gandhi, 2011, Complications after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as compared with traditional incision techniques: a meta-analysis, J Arthroplasty, 26, 29, 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.022 Smith, 2012, A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes following minimally invasive to conventional exposure for total knee arthroplasty, Knee, 19, 1, 10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.001 Cheng, 2010, Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 1635, 10.1007/s11999-010-1285-9 Whitehouse, 2005, The Oxford Knee Score; problems and pitfalls, Knee, 12, 287, 10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.005