Minimal important change and minimum clinically important difference values of the KOOS-12 after total knee arthroplasty

The Knee - Tập 29 - Trang 541-546 - 2021
Lukas Eckhard1,2, Selin Munir2, David Wood3, Simon Talbot4, Roger Brighton5, William L. Walter6,7, Jonathan Baré8
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
2Australian Institute of Musculoskeletal Research, Sydney, Australia
3North Sydney Orthopedics and Sport Medicine Centre, Sydney, Australia
4Orthopaedic Department Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
5Westmead Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
6University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
7Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
8Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gandek, 2019, Item selection for 12-item short forms of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12), Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 27, 746, 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.011 Gandek, 2019, A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 27, 762, 10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.011 Eckhard, 2021, The KOOS-12 shortform shows no ceiling effect, good responsiveness and construct validity compared to standard outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 29, 608, 10.1007/s00167-020-05904-x Terluin, 2015, Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis, J Clin Epidemiol, 68, 1388, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.015 King, 2011, A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 11, 171, 10.1586/erp.11.9 Beard, 2015, Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery, J Clin Epidemiol, 68, 73, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009 Ingelsrud, 2018, Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement, Acta Orthop, 89, 541, 10.1080/17453674.2018.1480739 Terluin, 2017, The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients, J Clin Epidemiol, 83, 90, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.015 Leopold, 2017, Editorial: the minimum clinically important difference –the least we can do, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475, 929, 10.1007/s11999-017-5253-5 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2019 Annual Report, Adelaide: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry; 2019. Crosby, 2003, Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life, J Clin Epidemiol, 56, 395, 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1