Mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate launch is a realistic option for in vitro fertilization

Fauser, 1999, Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks, Hum Reprod, 14, 2681, 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2681 Nargund, 2007, The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF, Hum Reprod, 22, 2801, 10.1093/humrep/dem285 Pennings, 2007, Coming soon to your clinic: patient friendly ART, Hum Reprod, 22, 2075, 10.1093/humrep/dem158 Gameiro, 2012, Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment, Hum Reprod Update, 18, 652, 10.1093/humupd/dms031 Baart, 2007, Milder ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial, Hum Reprod, 22, 980, 10.1093/humrep/del484 Gianaroli, 2010, Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process, Hum Reprod, 25, 2374, 10.1093/humrep/deq123 Pal, 2008, Less is more: increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization, Fertil Steril, 89, 1694, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.055 Smitz, 2007, Endocrine profile in serum and follicular fluid differs after ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in IVF patients, Hum Reprod, 22, 676, 10.1093/humrep/del445 Fauser, 2010, Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later, Hum Reprod, 25, 2678, 10.1093/humrep/deq247 Gleicher, 2012, A case-control pilot study of low-intensity IVF in good-prognosis patients, Reprod Biomed Online, 24, 396, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.011 Ferraretti, 2011, ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria, Hum Reprod, 26, 1616, 10.1093/humrep/der092 Verberg, 2009, The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 15, 5, 10.1093/humupd/dmn053 Benagiano, 2004, The new Italian IVF legislation, Reprod Biomed Online, 9, 117, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62118-9 Feliciani, 2009, IVF lite versus conventional ART: cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate over a given period of time, Hum Reprod, 24, i65 Soullier, 2008, Estimating the success of an in vitro fertilization programme using multiple imputation, Hum Reprod, 23, 187, 10.1093/humrep/dem352 Gnoth, 2011, Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey, Hum Reprod, 26, 2239, 10.1093/humrep/der178 Maliza, 2013, The cumulative probability of liveborn multiples after in vitro fertilization: a cohort study of more than 10,000 women, Fertil Steril, 99, 393, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.018 Stewart, 2011, How effective is in vitro fertilization, and how can it be improved?, Fertil Steril, 95, 1677, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.130 Garrido, 2011, Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: a new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success, Fertil Steril, 96, 40, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.008 Ingerslev, 2001, A randomized studing comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate, Hum Reprod, 16, 696, 10.1093/humrep/16.4.696 Edwards, 2007, IVF, IVM, natural cycle, minimal stimulation IVF—time for a rethink, Reprod Biomed Online, 15, 106, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60699-2 Kolibianakis, 2004, Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation, Hum Reprod, 19, 2545, 10.1093/humrep/deh452 Zhang, 2010, Minimal ovarian stimulation (mini IVF) for IVF utilizing vitrification and cryopreserved embryo transfer, Reprod Biomed Online, 21, 485, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.033 Revelli, 2011, Milder is better? Advantages and disadvantages of “mild” ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 16, 9 Merviel, 2012, What is mild stimulation?, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 40, 467, 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.07.022 Toledano, 2012, Are mild ovarian stimulations for IVF-ET a significant progress in assisted reproductive technologies?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 41, 6, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.08.008 Matsaseng, 2013, Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: are we ready to change? A meta-analysis, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 76, 233, 10.1159/000355980 Baker, 2013, Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: one perspective from the USA, J Assist Reprod Genet, 30, 197, 10.1007/s10815-013-9946-8 Mahajan, 2013, Should mild stimulation be the order of the day?, J Hum Reprod Sci, 6, 220, 10.4103/0974-1208.126282 Nardo, 2013, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens: a review of the available evidence for clinical practice. Produced on behalf of the BFS Policy and Practice Committee, Hum Fertil (Camb), 16, 144, 10.3109/14647273.2013.795385 Buhler, 2012, D.I.R. Annual 2011—German IVF-Registry, J Reprod Med Endocrinol, 9, 460 Bourgain, 2003, The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF, Hum Reprod Update, 9, 515, 10.1093/humupd/dmg045 Van Vaerenbergh, 2009, In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression, Hum Reprod, 24, 1085, 10.1093/humrep/den501 Zapantis, 2013, Premature formation of nucleolar channel systems indicates advanced endometrial maturation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, Hum Reprod, 28, 3292, 10.1093/humrep/det358 Venetis, 2013, Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60000 cycles, Hum Reprod Update, 19, 433, 10.1093/humupd/dmt014 Fatemi, 2007, An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles, Hum Reprod Update, 13, 581, 10.1093/humupd/dmm021 Fatemi, 2009, The luteal phase after 3 decades of IVF: what do we know?, Reprod Biomed Online, 19, 4331, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61065-6 Humaidan, 2012, The luteal phase after GnRH-agonist triggering of ovulation: present and future perspectives, Reprod Biomed Online, 24, 134, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.11.001 Maheshwari, 2013, Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?, Hum Reprod, 28, 6, 10.1093/humrep/des386 Smitz, 1988, The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT, Hum Reprod, 3, 585, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136750 Van Steirteghem, 1988, The luteal phase after in-vitro fertilization and related procedures, Hum Reprod, 3, 161, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136667 Macklon, 2000, Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase, J Reprod Fertil Suppl, 55, 101 Trounson, 1981, Pregnancies in humans by fertilization in vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycle, Science, 212, 681, 10.1126/science.7221557 Gibreel, 2012, Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD008528 2013