Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bare JC, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (1999): Life Cycle Impact Assessment Sophistication, International Workshop, Int. J. LCA 4 (5) 299–306
Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation (ESEERCO) (1995): New York State Environmental Externalities Cost Study, Volume 1: Introduction and Methods. Oceana Publications Inc., New York
ExternE (1995): Externalities of Energy, European Commission EUR 16520 EN, Volume 1–6 (http://www.ExternE.irc.es)
Goedkoop M (1995): Eco-Indicator 95. Final Report, Pre Consultants, Amersfoort
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (1999): The Eco-Indicator’99, A damage-oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. VROM, Zoetermeer (www.pre.nl)
Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Diun R, de Goede HP (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of products. Backgrounds & Guide, Leiden
Hofstetter P, Braunschweig A, Mettier Th, Mueller-Wenk R, Tietje O (2000): The Mixing triangle: Correlation and Graphical Decision Support for LCA-based Comparisons. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3 (4) 97–115
Steen B, Ryding SO: (1992): Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Federation of Swedish Industries, The EPS enviro-ac-counting method, Göteborg
Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Mueller-Wenk R (1999): Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA 4 (2) and (3)
UNEP Industry and Environment (1999): Towards the Global Use of Life Cycle Assessment. United Nations Publication Sales no. 92-807-1740-5, Paris, France