Microstructure of a Variety of Cokes After Alkali Enrichment
Tóm tắt
It is difficult to distinguish tamping coke and top charging coke by conventional testing methods, such as cold strength, abrasion resistance, reactivity and strength after reaction. Some of tamping coke s properties were even better than those of top charging coke, but from practical using effects of blast furnace, tamping coke was not as good as top charging coke. The reaction conditions were featured as high temperature, high alkali condition, intense reaction atmosphere and short time. Distribution of porosity in profile, microstructure and slag forming property of ash were analyzed and following conclusions were obtained. After alkali-rich reaction, there were obvious differences between top charging coke and tamping coke in microstructure. The porosity’s unevenness of tamping coke was greater than those of top charging coke, and tamping coke was with less and big pores in out space and inner part was dense with more throughout pores. After phase diagram and microstructure analysis, it could be obtained that ash forming characteristics of top charging coke were better than those of tamping coke, and top charging coke’s pores were blocked more seriously than those of tamping coke. From analysis of tuyere samples, it could be found that calcium content of ash in coke s pores was small and it should belong to coke s inherent ash; kalium (wK = 28%) was unusually high in coke, so the situation of high alkali was close to real blast furnace reaction condition.
Tài liệu tham khảo
ZHOU Shi-yong. Imitation Significance of Current Quality In dexes of Coke in Blast Furnace Production [J], Iron and Steel, 2000, 35(2): 1 (in Chinese).
ZHANG Dai-lin, ZENG Tao, LI Wei-feng, et al. The Relation Between Microstructure Characteristics for Coal and Coke and Quality of Coke [J]. Iron and Steel, 2011, 46(1): 14 (in Chinese).
ZHOU Shi-yong. Are-Appraisal of Role of Gas-Coal-Like in Coke Quality [J]. Iron and Steel, 2002, 32(Suppl): 294 (in Chinese).
WU Sheng-li, FU Chang-liang, LIU Cheng-song, et al. Coke Collapse Model and Collapse Profile Variation Law for Bell-Less Top BF [J], Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 2011, 18(10): 8.
ZHOU Shi-yong. Analysis of Quality Indexes of Coke in Blast Furnace [J]. Ironmaking, 2002, 21(6): 22 (in Chinese).
ZHANG Dai-lin, ZHAO Mei-mei, WANG Pei-zhen, et al. Study on Factors of Influencing on Coke Thermal Property [J], Iron and Steel, 2009, 44(10): 10 (in Chinese).
ZHOU Shi-yong. Study on Microstructure of Coke in Blast Furnace With Oxygen-Enriched Blast and Coal Injection [J]. Iron and Steel, 2002, 32(8): 1 (in Chinese).
WU Sheng-li, LIU Cheng-song, FU Chang-liang, et al. Improvements on Calculation Model of Theoretical Combustion Temperature in a Blast Furnace [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 2011, 18(12): 1.
Gudenau H W. Coke Quality Requirements for Modern Blast Furnace [J]. Cokemaking International, 1998, 10(1): 36.
ZHU Wei-chun, ZHANG Xue-song, MA Li. Research on Change of Alkali Metal of Coke at BF Hearth Radial Direction and the Affection of Coke Performance [J]. Iron and Steel, 2009, 46(6): 20 (in Chinese).
DU He-gui, YANG Jun-he. Catalysis of Metallurgical Coke Solution Loss Reaction by Minerals [J], Ironmaking, 2002, 21(4): 22 (in Chinese).
GUO Hao, ZHANG Jian-liang, MA Huan, et al. Influence of Compound of Alkali Earth Metals on Coke Reactivity [J]. Iron and Steel, 2009, 44(2): 15 (in Chinese).