Micropropagation of virus-free plants of Saudi fig (Ficus carica L.) and their identification through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods
Tóm tắt
Viral infection is one of the most serious biotic stresses, which disturbs the growth and productivity of many horticultural crops, including that of fig (Ficus carica L.). The production of plants free of viruses, such as fig mosaic virus (FMV), has become a priority in many plant breeding programs. In this study, leaves from plants of two fig cultivars, Kodato and Dattora, infected with FMV were collected from both Mecca and Al-Taif, Saudi Arabia. Transmission electron microscopy of ultrathin leaf sections showed double membrane bodies, characteristic of FMV particles, only in the mesophyll cells of infected samples. Protein analysis using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed the presence of a protein band with a molecular weight of 35 kDa, which corresponded to the viral coat protein; and FMV was confirmed by Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests. To obtain virus-free plants, apical shoot culture was applied. A comparison of various artificial media with different concentrations of growth regulators was evaluated to optimize shoot formation, shoot multiplication, and root formation, and was followed by plant acclimation ex vitro. Direct ELISA analysis of shoots micropropagated from meristem tip explants indicated that there were virus-free shoots, when compared to infected plants (positive control), while there were no significant differences between these explants and healthy samples (negative control). This study demonstrated that in vitro micropropagation of Saudi F. carica infected with FMV virus led to the successful elimination of the virus.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahn KK, Kim KS, Gergerch RC, Jensen SG, Anderson EJ (1996) Comparative ultrastructure of double membrane – bound particles and inclusions associated with eriophyid mite-borne plant diseases of unknown etiology: a potentially new group of plant viruses. J Sub Miscopic Cytol Pathol 28:345–355
Aldhebiani AY, Elbeshehy EKF, Baeshen AA, Elbeaino T (2015) Four viruses infecting figs in Western Saudi Arabia. Phytopathol Mediter 54:497–503
Appiano A, Conti M, Zini N (1995) Cytopathological study of the double-membrane bodies occurring in fig plants affected by fig mosaic disease. Acta Hort 386:585–592
Bayoudh C, Elair M, Labidi R, Majdoub A, Mahfoudhi N, Mars M (2017) Efficiency of tissue culture in virus elimination from caprifig and female fig varieties (Ficus carica L.). Plant Pathol J 33:288–295
Bhojwani SS, Razdan MK (1996) Haploid production. Plant tissue culture: theory and practice. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 167–213
Çağlayan K, Medina V, Gazel M, Serçe CU, Serrano L, Achon A, Soylu S, Çalişkan O, Gümüş M (2009) Putative agents of fig mosaic disease in Turkey. Turk J Agric For 33:469–476
Carvalho SLD, Silva FND, Zanardo LG, Almeida AM, Zerbini FM, Carvalho CM (2013) Production of polyclonal antiserum against Cowpea mild mottle virus coat protein and its application in virus detection. Trop Plant Pathol 38:49–54
Castellano MA, Gattoni G, Minafra A, Conti M, Martelli GP (2007) Fig mosaic in Mexico and South Africa. J Plant Pathol 89:441–444
Chalak L, Elbeaino T, Elbitar A, Fattal T, Choueiri E (2015) Removal of viruses from Lebanese fig varieties using tissue culture and thermotherapy. Phytopathol Mediterr 54:531–535
Chiumenti M, Campanale A, Bottalico G, Minafra A, De Stradis A, Savino V, Martelli GP (2013) Sanitation trials for the production of virus-free fig stocks. Plant Pathol 95:655–658
Clark MF, Adams A (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34:475–483
Condit IJ, Horne WT (1933) A mosaic of the fig in California. Phytopathology 23:887–896
CoStat (2005) CoStat program, version 6. CoHort Software, Monterey, CA, USA, p 4
Danial GH, Ibrahim DA, Barkat SA, Khalil BM (2014) Multiple shoots production from shoot tips of fig tree (Ficus carica L.) and callus induction from leaf segments. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol 20:117–124
Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 1:1–42
Elbeshehy EK, Metwali EM, Almaghrabi OA (2015) Antiviral activity of Thuja orientalis extracts against watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) on Citrullus lanatus. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:211–219
Fang Y, Ramasamy RP (2015) Current and prospective methods for plant disease detection. Biosensors 5:537–561
Gabrenaite-Verkhovskaya R, Andreev IA, Kalinina NO, Torrance L, Taliansky ME, Mäkinen K (2008) Cylindrical inclusion protein of potato virus A is associated with a subpopulation of particles isolated from infected plants. J Gener Virol 89:829–838
Hafez E, El Morsi AA, Abdelkhalek AA (2011) Biological and molecular characterization of the fig mosaic disease. Mol Pathogens 2:10–14
Hatipoğlu R (1997) Plant Biotechnology, Çukurova University Press, Adana
Jensen SG, Lane LC, Seifers DL (1996) A new disease of maize and wheat in the high plains. Plant Dis 80:1387–1390
Kitajima EW, Resende RDO, de Âvila AC, Goldbach RW, Peters D (1992) Immuno-electron microscopical detection of tomato spotted wilt virus and its nucleocapsids in crude plant extracts. J Virol Methods 38:313–322
Kumar PL, Jones AT, Reddy DVR (2003) A novel mite-transmitted virus with a divided RNA genome closely associated with pigeonpea sterility mosaic disease. Phytopathology 93:71–81
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685
Lister RM, Hammond J, Clements DL (1983) Comparison of interadermal and intermuscular injection for raising plant virus antisera for use in Elisa. J Virol Methods 6:179–182
Martelli GP (2011) Fig mosaic disease and associated pathogens. In: Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W (eds) Virus and virus-like diseases of pome and stone fruits. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, pp 281–287
Martinelli F, Scalenghe R, Davino S, Panno S, Scuderi G, Ruisi P, Villa P, Stroppiana D, Boschetti M, Goulart LR, Davis CE (2015) Advanced methods of plant disease detection. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1–25
Metwali MR, Soliman IE, Fuller MP, Al-Zahrani HS, Howladar SM (2015) Molecular cloning and expression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene (AgNHX1) in fig (Ficus carica L.) under salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 123:377–387
Mielke-Ehret N, Mühlbach HP (2012) Emaravirus: a novel genus of multipartite, negative strand RNA plant viruses. Viruses 4:1515–1536
Milne RG, Lesemann OE (1984) Immunosorbent electron microscopy in plant virus studies. Methods Virol 8:85–101
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Naidu RA, Hughes JD (2003) Methods for the detection of plant virus diseases. In: Jacqueline H, Babajide OO (eds) Plant virology in sub-Saharan Africa, Proceedings of a Conference, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp.233–253
Nicotra G, Vicentini S, Mazzolari A (2010) Research and development of a dry extract. Nutrafoods 9:27–30
Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV, Senthil-Kumar M (2017) Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci 8:1–15
Patil VV, Patil VR (2011) Ficus carica Linn. An overview. Res J Med Plant 5:246–253
Perosa F, Carbone R, Ferrone S, Dammacco F (1990) Purification of human immunoglobulins by sequential precipitation with caprylic acid and ammonium sulphate. J Immunol Methods 128:9–16
Ramgareeb S, Snyman SJ, Van Antwerpen T, Rutherford RS (2010) Elimination of virus and rapid propagation of disease-free sugarcane (Saccharum spp. cultivar NCo376) using apical meristem culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100:175–181
Schaad NW, Frederick RD, Shaw J, Schneider WL, Hickson R, Petrillo MD, Luster DG (2003) Advances in molecular-based diagnostics in meeting crop biosecurity and phytosanitary issues. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:305–324
Seifers DL, Harvey TL, Martin TJ, Jensen SG (1998) A partial host range of the high plains virus of corn and wheat. Plant Dis 82:875–879
Serrano L, Ramon J, Segarra J, Medina V, Achón MA, López M, Juárez M (2004) New approach in the identification of the causal agent of fig mosaic disease. Acta Hort 657:559–566
Singh A, Prakash J, Meghwal PR, Ranpise SA (2015) Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Ghosh SN (ed) Breeding of Underutilized Fruit Crop. Jaya Publishing House, New Delhi
Singh BM, Rajoriya CM, Wani IA, RawatRS JBL (2016) In vitro studies of Ficus carica and its application in crop improvement. Int J Res App Sci EngTechnol 4:135–148
Smith MK, Drew RA (1990) Current applications of tissue culture in plant propagation and improvement. Funct Plant Biol 17:267–289
Spurr AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruc Res 26:31–43
Swank RT, Munker KD (1971) Molecular weight analysis of oligopeptides by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel with sodium dodecyl sulfate. Anal Biochem 39:462–477
Taşkın H, Baktemur G, Kurul M, Büyükalaca S (2013) Use of tissue culture techniques for producing virus-free plant in garlic and their identification through real-time PCR. Sci World J 2013:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/781282
Van Regenmortel MHV, Dubs MC (1993) Serological procedures. In: Matthews REF (ed) Diagnosis of plant virus diseases. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 159–214