Microanalysis Of Online Data: The methodological development of “digital CA”

Discourse, Context and Media - Tập 7 - Trang 45-51 - 2015
David Giles1, Wyke Stommel2, Trena M. Paulus3, Jessica Nina Lester4, Darren Reed5
1Department of Psychology, University of Winchester, West Hill, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK
2Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, PO Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, University of Tennessee, 335 Claxton Complex, 1122 Volunteer Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
4Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Indiana University School of Education, 201N. Rose Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405-1006, USA
5Department of Sociology, Wentworth College, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Antaki, 2005, “For she who knows who she is”: managing accountability in online forum messages, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 11, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x

1984

Baym, 2011

Bou-Franch, 2012, Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: a study of coherence, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 17, 501, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x

British Psychological Society, 2013. Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester: Author. Available from: 〈www.bps.org.uk/publications/policy-andguidelines/research-guidelines-policydocuments/research-guidelines-poli〉.

Brotsky, 2007, Inside the “pro-ana" community: A covert online participant observation, Eating Disorders: J. Treat. Prevent., 19, 93, 10.1080/10640260701190600

Bruhn Jensen, 2010, New media, old methods: internet methodologies and the online/offline divide

Clelland, 2014, Racism, football fans and onlinem essage boards: how social media has added a new dimension to racist discourse in English football, J. Sport Soc. Issues, 38, 415, 10.1177/0193723513499922

Danby, 2009, When ‘listeners can’t talk.’ Comparing active listening in opening sequences of telephone and online counselling, Aust. J. Commun., 36, 91

Erickson, 1999, Persistant [sic] conversation: an introduction, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 4, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00105.x

Franzén, 2011, The beauty of blood? Self-injury and ambivalence in an Internet community, J. You. Stud., 14, 279, 10.1080/13676261.2010.533755

Garcia, 1999, The eyes of the beholder: understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-syncronous computer-mediated communication, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 32, 337, 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2

Garton, 1997, Studying online social networks, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 3

Gibson, 2009, Negotiating textual talk: conversation analysis, pedagogy and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse, Br. Educ. Res. J., 35, 705, 10.1080/01411920802688754

Giles, 2006, Constructing identities in cyberspace: The case of eating disorders, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 45, 463, 10.1348/014466605X53596

Gray, 2014, Oh my god, we׳re not doing nothing’: Young people’s experiences of spatial regulation, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 53, 640, 10.1111/bjso.12055

Heritage, 2010

Herring, 1999, Interactional coherence in CMC, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 4, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x

Herring, 2004, Computer-mediated discourse analysis; an approach to researching online behavior, 338

Herring S., 2007. A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 4 (article 1).

Herring, 2010, Computer-mediated conversation: introduction and overview, Language@Internet, 7

Hine, 1999

Horne, 2009, Doing being ‘on the edge’: managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 170, 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01130.x

Hutchby, 2013

Hutchby, 2008

Kozinets, 2010

Lester, 2011, Accountability and public displays of knowing in an undergraduate computer-mediated communication context, Discourse Stud., 13, 671, 10.1177/1461445611421361

Liamputtong, 2011

Lin, 2009, Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining, Comput. Educ., 52, 481, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.005

Malik, 2008, The male experience of infertility: A thematic analysis of an online infertility support group bulletin board, J. Inf. Reprod. Psychol., 26, 18, 10.1080/02646830701759777

Markham, 1998

Markham, 2004, The internet as research context

Markham, 2012, Fabrication as ethical practice, Inf. Commun. Soc., 15, 334, 10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993

Meho, 2006, E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: a methodological discussion, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57, 1284, 10.1002/asi.20416

Meredith, 2013, Repair: comparing Facebook ‘chat’ with spoken interaction, Discourse Commun., 8, 181, 10.1177/1750481313510815

Ong, 2011, Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats, Discourse Stud., 13, 211, 10.1177/1461445610392138

Panyametheekul, 2003, Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 9

Raclaw, 2008, Two patterns for conversational closings in instant message discourse, Colo. Res. Ling., 21, 34

Reed, D. (2001). ‘Making conversation’: sequential integrity and the local management of interaction on Internet newsgroups. In: Paper Presented at the 34th International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

Reed, 2000, The naturally-occurring chat machine, M/C J., 3, 10.5204/mcj.1860

Rezabek, 2000, Online focus groups: electronic discussions for research [67 paragraphs], Forum Qual. Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual. Soc. Res., 1

Rogers, 2009

Sacks, 1992, vol. 1,2

Schegloff, 1997, Whose text? Whose context?, Discourse Soc., 8, 165, 10.1177/0957926597008002002

Schönfeldt, 2003, Repair in chats: a conversation analytic approach, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 36, 241, 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02

Severinson Eklundh, 1994, The use of quoting to preserve context in electronic mail dialogues, IEEE Trans. Prof. Conduct, 37, 197, 10.1109/47.365163

Stommel, 2008, Conversation analysis and community of practice: an approach to studying online community, Language@Internet, 5

Stommel, 2010, The online support group as a community: a microanalysis of the interaction with a new member, Discourse Stud., 12, 357, 10.1177/1461445609358518

Stommel, 2013, Formulation in “trouble” chat sessions, Language@Internet, 10

Ten Have, 1999, Structuring writing for reading: hypertext and the reading body, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.Hum. Stud., 22, 273

Turney, 2005, Virtual focus groups: new frontiers in research, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 4, 1, 10.1177/160940690500400203

Wen, 2011, From diagnosis to death: a case study of coping with breast cancer as seen through online discussion group messages, J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 16, 331, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01542.x

Westerlund, 2012, The production of pro-suicide content on the Internet: a counter-discourse activity, New Media & Society, 14, 764, 10.1177/1461444811425221