Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention

Aminzade, R. A. (1981). Class, politics, and early industrial capitalism: A study of mid-nineteenth-century Toulouse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Auyero, J. (2003). Contentious lives: Two Argentine women, two protests, and the quest for recognition. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bennett, A. (2003). Beyond Hempel and back to Hume: Causal mechanisms and causal explanation. Presented to the annual meeting of the American political science association, Philadelphia, August 28, 2003.

Bermeo, N., & Nord, P. (Eds.). (2000). Civil society before democracy. Lessons from nineteenth-century Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Binder, A. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Boudreau, V. (2004). At the margins of the movement: Grassroots and cadre in Philippine protest. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bunge, M. (1997). Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27, 410–465.

Bunge, M. (1998). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Büthe, T. (2002). Taking temporality seriously: Modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence. American Political Science Review, 96, 481–493.

Campbell, J. L. (2005). Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Caramani, D. (2004). The nationalization of politics: The formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cherkaoui, M. (2005). Invisible codes; Essays on generative mechanisms. Oxford: Bardwell Press.

Clemens, E. S. (1997). The people's lobby: Organizational innovation and the rise of interest group politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2001). Greed and grievance in civil war. Policy Research Paper 2355. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Crozier, M. (1966). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind: Rationality and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engelstad, F., & Østerud, Ø. (Eds.). (2004). Power and democracy. Critical interventions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Evans, S. (1980). Personal politics. New York: Vintage Books.

Falleti, T. G., & Lynch J. (2007). Causal mechanisms and context in comparative historical analysis. Unpublished paper, University of Pennsylvania Department of Political Science, September 21st.

Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75–90.

Fox. J., & Brown, G. D. (Eds.). (1998). The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Freeman, J. (1973). The origins of the women’s liberation movement. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 792–811.

Garrard, J. (2002). Democratisation in Britain: Elites, civil society and reform since 1800. New York: Palgrave.

George, A. L. (1979). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In P. G. Lauren (Ed.), Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory and policy. New York: The Free Press.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Glenn III., J. K. (2001). Framing democracy: Civil society and civic movements in eastern Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Goldstone, J., & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In R. Aminzade, et al. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodin, R., & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Gross, N. (2006). What is a social mechanism? A pragmatic approach. Unpublished paper, Harvard University Department of Sociology.

Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social on the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kalyvas, S. (2003). The ontology of ‘political violence’: Action and identity in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 475–494.

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kurzman, C. (2004). Can understanding undermine explanation? The confused experience of revolution. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 328–351.

Lichterman, P. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Little, D. (1991). Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Boulder: Westview.

Little, D. (1998). On the philosophy of the social sciences: Microfoundations, method, and causation. New Brunswick: Transaction.

Mahoney, J. (2001). Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum, 16, 575–593.

Mahoney, J. (2002). Causal mechanisms, correlations, and a power theory of society. Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.

Mahoney, J. (2008). Causality in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies (in press).

Margadant, T. W. (1979). French peasants in revolt: The insurrection of 1851. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Markoff, J. (1996). The abolition of feudalism: Peasants, lords, and legislators in the French revolution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Mayntz, R. (2004). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 237–259.

McAdam, D. [1982] (1999). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.

McAdam, D. (2003). Beyond structural analysis: Toward a more dynamic understanding of social movements. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1988). Social movements. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

McAdam, D., & Sewell, W. (2001). It’s about time: Temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions. In R. Aminzade, et al. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D., & Su, Y. (2002). The war at home: Vietnam protests and congressional voting, 1965–1973. American Sociological Review, 67, 696–721.

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2007). Contentious politics and social movements. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108, 38–51.

Mische, A. (1998). Projecting democracy: Contexts and dynamics of youth activism in the Brazilian impeachment movement. Doctoral dissertation, New School for social research.

Mische, A. (2003). Cross-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mische, A. (2008). Partisan publics: Communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Mobilization. (2003). Book Symposium on Dynamics of Contention. Mobilization, 8.

Morris, A. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. New York: The Free Press.

Norkus, Z. (2005). Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the ‘mechanismic approach’ in social science and history. History and Theory, 44, 348–372.

Osa, M. (1997). Creating solidarity: The religious foundations of the polish social movement. East European Politics and Societies, 11, 339–65.

Osa, M. (2003). Solidarity and contention: The networks of polish opposition, 1954–1981. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Peterson, A. L. (1997). Martyrdom and the politics of religion: Progressive Catholicism in El Salvador's civil war. Albany: SUNY Press.

Pickel, A. (2006). The problem of order in the global age: Systems and mechanisms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rokkan, S. (1970). The mobilization of the periphery: Data on turnout, party membership and candidate recruitment in Norway. In S. Rokkan (Ed.), Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Roy, B. (1994). Some trouble with cows. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rutten, R. (1996). Popular support for the revolutionary movement CPP-NPA: Experiences in a hacienda in Negros Occidental 1978–1995. In P. N. Abinales (Ed.), The revolution falters: The left in Philippine politics after 1986. Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program Publications.

Sambanis, N. (2003). Using case studies to expand economic models of civil war. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 259–79.

Sherman, D. J. (2004). Not here, not there, not anywhere: The federal, state, and local politics of low-level radioactive waste disposal in the United States, 1979–1999. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Cornell University Department of Government.

Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and movement participation. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Soule, S. (1997). The student divestment movement in the United States and tactical diffusion: The shantytown protest. Social Forces, 75, 855–882.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stonich, S. (2002). Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (2005). The logic of social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tarrow, S. (1967). Peasant communism in southern Italy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Tarrow, S. (1977). Between center and periphery: Grassroots politicians in Italy and France. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tarrow, S. (2004). Center-periphery alignments and political contention in late modern Europe. In C. Ansell & G. di Palma (Eds.), Restructuring territoriality: Europe and the United States compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tarrow, S. (2007). Inside insurgencies: Politics and violence in an age of civil war. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 587–600.

Tarrow, S., & McAdam, D. (2005). Scale shift in transnational contention. In D. Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Tilly, C. (1997). Parliamentarization of popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Theory And Society, 26, 245–273.

Tilly, C. (2000). Processes and mechanisms of democratization. Sociological Theory, 18, 1–16.

Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 21–41.

Tilly, C. (2004a). Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 211–236.

Tilly, C. (2004b). Observations of social processes and their formal representations. Sociological Theory, 22, 595–602.

Tilly, C. (2005). Trust and rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (2007a). Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (2007b). Mechanisms of the middle range. Presented to the conference on the work of R. K. Merton and its implications for sociology and related fields today. Columbia University, 9–10 August.

Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

Tilly, C., Tilly, L., & Tilly, R. (1975). The rebellious century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tilly, C., & Wood, L. (2003). Contentious connections in Great Britain, 1828–1834. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wada, T. (2007). Demonstrating repertoires of contention. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Weinstein, J. (2006). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Woloch, I. (1994). The new regime: Transformations of the French civic order, 1789–1820s. New York: Norton.

Wood, E. J. (2000). Forging democracy from below: Insurgent transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, E. J. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhao, D. (1998). Ecologies of social movements: Student mobilization during the 1989 prodemocracy movement in Beijing. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1493–1529.

Zuckerman, A. S., Dasović, J., & Fitzgerald, J. (2007). Partisan families: Bounded partisanship in Germany and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.